Re: [dns-operations] Prevalence of query/response logging?

2014-07-06 Thread Roland Dobbins
On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Ralf Weber wrote: > Our (Nominum) DNS software had in server query/response storage and > processing without much overhead since 2009 and I know that a lot of our > customers use it, but of course I can't speak for them. Sure. This is done via its database back-e

Re: [dns-operations] Prevalence of query/response logging?

2014-07-06 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 04 Jul 2014, at 13:00, Roland Dobbins wrote: > I know that some DNS operators disable logging of queries/responses due to > the overhead of doing so - are most folks on this list with large-scale DNS > recursive and/or authoritative DNS infrastructure disabling logging, enabling > it,

Re: [dns-operations] Why would a recusrive caching server not resolve a CNAME?

2014-07-06 Thread Mohamed Lrhazi
Thanks Lyle, I did not mean to say that list was defunct, quite the opposite, I felt that I was a bit spamming it with non global operational DNS issue Yes, I did not debug well, went for the quick fix of clearing the cache That being said, end users query for the name and the IPs, always.

Re: [dns-operations] Why would a recusrive caching server not resolve a CNAME?

2014-07-06 Thread Lyle Giese
You waited less than an hour before proclaiming the list defunct? It's Sunday in most of the world. Most of us are doing other things than sitting on this list. That said, my initial thought is that your server answered your question. Nothing more. Did you ask it for the A record for googl

Re: [dns-operations] Why would a recusrive caching server not resolve a CNAME?

2014-07-06 Thread Mohamed Lrhazi
I am thinking this list is not appropriate for some of my questions... Could someone suggest a better one, maybe as active and rich, as this one, but more appropriate for general DNS discussions? Thanks a lot, Mohamed. On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote: > We had a little mai

[dns-operations] Why would a recusrive caching server not resolve a CNAME?

2014-07-06 Thread Mohamed Lrhazi
We had a little mail outage which turned out to be caused by one of our caching DNS servers returning the bellow incomplete reply. Clearing the cache on the problematic server fixed the issue Am thinking it is now impossible for me to find the root cause in this instance... but wondering if y

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Emmanuel Thierry
Le 6 juil. 2014 à 17:17, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:10:29PM +0200, > Emmanuel Thierry wrote > a message of 45 lines which said: > >> Contrarily to dnsN.emarkmonitor.com, nsN.markmonitor.com replies to queries. >> But the answer is still different from google se

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Gmail.ie redirects to Gmail correctly .. Though I've never seen them advertise Gmail using anything other than the .com .. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Domains http://www.blacknight.co/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.technology.ie In

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread sthaug
> > By the way, as far as i know french people use gmail.com in place of > > gmail.fr. They won't even notice ! ;) > > Indeed, I've never seen gmail.fr advertised by Google and I'm > surprised to learn it is used in Norway. Google Search finds only one > link for gmail.fr :-) It may not actually

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:14:10PM +0200, Emmanuel Thierry wrote a message of 52 lines which said: > By the way, as far as i know french people use gmail.com in place of > gmail.fr. They won't even notice ! ;) Indeed, I've never seen gmail.fr advertised by Google and I'm surprised to learn it

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Emmanuel Thierry wrote a message of 45 lines which said: > Contrarily to dnsN.emarkmonitor.com, nsN.markmonitor.com replies to queries. > But the answer is still different from google servers : It does not matter what server X or server Y says, even i

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Emmanuel Thierry
Le 6 juil. 2014 à 16:34, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 03:45:18PM +0200, > sth...@nethelp.no wrote > a message of 30 lines which said: > >> But according to the name servers for .fr, >> >> gmail.fr. 172800 IN NS dns1.emarkmonitor.com. >> gma

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Emmanuel Thierry
Le 6 juil. 2014 à 17:10, Emmanuel Thierry a écrit : > > Le 6 juil. 2014 à 16:34, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit : > >> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 03:45:18PM +0200, >> sth...@nethelp.no wrote >> a message of 30 lines which said: >> >>> But according to the name servers for .fr, >>> >>> gmail.fr.

Re: [dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 03:45:18PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > But according to the name servers for .fr, > > gmail.fr. 172800 IN NS dns1.emarkmonitor.com. > gmail.fr. 172800 IN NS dns2.emarkmonitor.com.

[dns-operations] What's the story on gmail.fr?

2014-07-06 Thread sthaug
According to Google - ns{1,2,3,4}.google.com: gmail.fr. 345600 IN NS ns1.google.com. gmail.fr. 345600 IN NS ns2.google.com. gmail.fr. 345600 IN NS ns3.google.com. gmail.fr. 345600 IN NS ns4.google.c