Le 11/04/2019 à 11:29, Steffen Dettmer via Dng a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:54 PM Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
/etc/rc2.d/S03ccucvm_startup_script
(pointing to ../init.d/ccucvm_startup_script),
[...] my script is not executed.
I investigated further and I noticed that there are hidde
Le 12/04/2019 à 17:24, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote:
I suggest we pass the following resolution:
===
At Devuan we prioritize benefi
On 12/4/19 23:20, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
So you only have to endure me another 18 days.
0 days, in my case, because I won't waste more time reading your messages.
Good luck :)
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 01:51:39AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
Following common understanding with other caretakers and parallel to
the work on the conference documentation, I have started this website,
soon to be linked by Devuan's official domain, served under TLS and
completed with a list of willin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:54 PM Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> /etc/rc2.d/S03ccucvm_startup_script
>
>(pointing to ../init.d/ccucvm_startup_script),
>
> [...] my script is not executed.
I investigated further and I noticed that there are hidden files
like "/etc/init.d/.depend-start" that seem to
Hi,
At work I'm playing with Devuan in a VM supposed to replace
embedded systems. These systems have special proprietary software
which is deployed using a proprietary package manager, which
unfortunately does not support executing scripts (such as
postinstall).
To start the proprietary software,
On 2019-04-12 16:27, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:33:18 +0300, Lars wrote in message
:
On 4/12/19 6:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[snip]
> The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it
> appears to say that one could choose systemd.
>
> We need to be clear that we a
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:33:18 +0300, Lars wrote in message
:
> On 4/12/19 6:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> [snip]
> > The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it
> > appears to say that one could choose systemd.
> >
> > We need to be clear that we are promoting freedom by provid
On 12-04-19 12:15, Svante Signell via Dng wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 23:52 +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
>> On 11-04-19 23:38, Daniel Reurich wrote:
Have I missed something? I want Katolaz back.
Who is CenturionDan? And why does he have that much power?
>>> I am Centu
On 12/4/19 21:45, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Seems to work now. Thanks to whoever did it.
-- hendrik
Yes, i was getting the same "Your connection is not secure" message, but
now the website works :)
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
http
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:35:35PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 01:51:39AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
...
> >
> > Following common understanding with other caretakers and parallel to
> > the work on the conference documentation, I have started this website,
> > soon to be linked
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> > > Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
> > > "freedom of init choi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
> > "freedom of init choice"?
>
> The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that
On 4/12/19 6:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[snip]
> The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it appears
> to say that one could choose systemd.
>
> We need to be clear that we are promoting freedom by providing
> alternatives to systemd, and that users that choose systemd can
>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > I suggest we pass the following resolution:
> >
> > ===
> > At Devuan we prioritize benefits to individual users over be
Il giorno venerdì 12/04/2019 10:41:53 +0200
Antony Stone ha scritto:
> On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > I suggest we pass the following resolution:
> >
[cut]
> Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
> "freedom of init choice"?
[cu
> On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:47 +0200, Jaromil wrote:
> > dear devs
> >
> > for having caused the distress of trust within the caretakers group
> > beyond our agreed liabilities (see licensing conditions of Devuan) and
> > having caused the (hopefully temporary) resignation of one caretaker
> > and
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 23:52 +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> On 11-04-19 23:38, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> > > Have I missed something? I want Katolaz back.
> > > Who is CenturionDan? And why does he have that much power?
> > I am CenturionDan. I don't have any power over Devuan, and
On 2019-04-12 07:26, Jaromil wrote:
> because I believe timing of this debate is crucial
> I stayed up late yesterday night to put up a mock
> up site without tls http://devuan.pro
> just to signal we are moving forward, not backwards. indeed much to do before
> announcing
> first and foremost the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote
> "freedom of init choice"?
>
> I'nm not suggesting that we should include systemd in what Devuan provides
> (!), but I just think the phrase "freedom of choice
On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote:
> I suggest we pass the following resolution:
>
> ===
> At Devuan we prioritize benefits to individual users over benefits to
> corporations. Within the overarching umbrella of delivering
>
Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):
> because I believe timing of this debate is crucial
> I stayed up late yesterday night to put up a mock
> up site without tls http://devuan.pro
> just to signal we are moving forward, not backwards. indeed much to do
> before announcing first and foremost the T
because I believe timing of this debate is crucial
I stayed up late yesterday night to put up a mock
up site without tls http://devuan.pro
just to signal we are moving forward, not backwards. indeed much to do before
announcing
first and foremost the TLS cert.
the wording and style will be improv
23 matches
Mail list logo
