On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:33:18 +0300, Lars wrote in message <b21edc90-40c5-12be-9558-7731efd0e...@gmail.com>:
> On 4/12/19 6:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > [snip] > > The problem with the phrase "freedom of init choice" is that it > > appears to say that one could choose systemd. > > > > We need to be clear that we are promoting freedom by providing > > alternatives to systemd, and that users that choose systemd can > > use Debian with our blessing. > > +1 ..we could add to that blessing, that "Debian is our back-up plan in case we are wrong on the merits or perils of systemd, and we can be Debian's back-up plan when they learn enough on the merits and perils of systemd to make a properly informed decision on what to do. ;o)" > The misrepresentation of systemd as an init system adds to that > confusion. ...and explaining that scornful fact in a scornless way, adds to the challenge. Maybe compare "the way Linux came out of Unix and Minix, to the way systemd came out of GNU/Linux as an OS"? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
