Il giorno venerdì 12/04/2019 10:41:53 +0200 Antony Stone <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> On Friday 12 April 2019 at 00:53:40, Steve Litt wrote: > > > I suggest we pass the following resolution: > > [cut] > Do we want to emphasise purely "sans-systemd", or do we want to promote > "freedom of init choice"? [cut] > Functionally they come down to the same thing, but I think a positive phrase > is better than a negative one. Hi that's what I suggest, partly agreeing with Antony (I suggest using both, positive first and negative later but explaining) and also thinking it should be better to emphatize more the "human", "social" and "freedom" aspects: ================================================================================ At Devuan we favor the advantages for individual users and communities of people, over economic benefits for corporations. We seek to make life fun for all users, developers, caretakers and contributors, promoting freedom of init choice within the overarching umbrella of delivering systemd-free GNU/Linux systems in order to preserve simplicity, modularity and interoperability. =============================================================================== Regards -- al3xu5 Say NO to copyright, patents, trademarks and any industrial design restrictions. ________________________________________________________________________________ Public GPG/PGP key block ID: 4096 bit RSA key 69C5977BF94CFE23 Fingerprint: 59C6 9DC7 CD4B CF2F A190 E3DE 69C5 977B F94C FE23
pgp9SrZ35sqPL.pgp
Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
