Hi,
I downloaded and compiled Felker's minimal init but found it didn't
work. Examining the code it seems that the website had been
vandalised. According to my logic the endless loops should be at the
end rather than at the middle of the code. Furthermore, the code seems
to first block signals the
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:08 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
> On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
>>
>> Not anymore. It's plain "firefox" from Ascii (=Stretch) on.
>
> On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>
> [About possible branding issues for a hypothetical
> future Pale Moon package in De(vu|bi)an.]
>
> > This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
>
> Not anymore. It's plain
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
[About possible branding issues for a hypothetical
future Pale Moon package in De(vu|bi)an.]
> This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
Not anymore. It's plain "firefox" from Ascii (=Stretch) on.
[...]
> My vote: Europa. O
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:37:11 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:49:27 +0200
> Irrwahn wrote:
[...]
>> I'm probably missing something important here, so I have
>> to ask: What would be the point in replacing an easily
>> comprehensible, self-contained and statically linked piece
Just wanted to pass the word, I installed SaltStack master on Devuan
outside the repos (2014-01was kinda old) from the SaltStack installer and
had no problems. Didn't even have to decompose systemd settings & setup an
init.d script like I had to do with Plex.
Wonder why SaltStack is so old in the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:37:11PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> Right now, Felker's PID1 is the acknowledged "Hello World" PID1. But as
> I remember you have to add an #include to get it to work with
> mainstream Linuxes, you have to get it to compile, and it's just not as
> understandable
> On June 13, 2016 at 9:57 PM Steve Litt wrote:
> > Only issue with pale moon is the branding:
> > https://www.palemoon.org/branding.shtml
> >
> > Not sure if that's compatible with the main repo, maybe it needs
> > rebranding first?
> Yeah, just call it Bright Star, and swap the pale moon grap
Also I heard they do include some non restricted graphic in their sources as
the default when building, the graphic they use in the binary builds is the one
they use those terms for I believe.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:32 AM, dev1fanboy
wrote:
> Yeah it's a pretty great b
Yeah it's a pretty great browser, rename/rebrand and it won't matter. Best to
stay away from the whole "the brand is ours" thing. All one needs really is a
graphic that looks like a moon or other various space "rock" and it'll be fine.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:57 AM, Steve
On 2016-06-13 09:42, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> Appears to work for me.
>
> If you think the template is done, please submit it upstream:
> https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/contribute/
>
Hi Adam,
Thanks very much for the feedback. I'm glad it worked for you!
I just pushed an update with config to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:34:23 +0100
"dev1fanboy" wrote:
> It would be nice to have palemoon, they are pretty open to choice and
> are specifically against adding any DRM support in their browser.
> Also, it works with XUL and doesn't have the bloat that Iceweasel
> does that is annoying people in
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:49:27 +0200
Irrwahn wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:47:49 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> [...]
> > Then I'd write a shellscript workalike for Suckless Init. In my
> > opinion, once you've done that, you should publicize it like the
> > Autumn leaves, because you've done a serv
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:14:00 +0200
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> But I still am convinced with a signed kernel one can still use it to
> boot any installed OS. My reasoning goes like this: once the signed
> kernel boots, it would be in control of the machine. A running kernel
> can be used to run any
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:02:12 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 13/06/2016 08:16, Edward Bartolo a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
> > DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
> > ignore it.
> >
> > Till now, I impleme
On 2016-06-14 00:39, Simon Walter wrote:
> Well, maybe I didn't say it correctly. Is there already a devuan-keyring
> package on the iso-image?
It's a debootstrap install. There's no iso-image involved.
> My personal opinion is that keys should not be automatically downloaded
> and installed. B
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:19:43 +0200
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:16:44AM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
> > DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
> > ignore it.
>
>
On 2016-06-13 13:42, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> The message means that using a certain locale has been requested by
> setting the LANGUAGE and LANG environment variables to its name but that
> it can't really be used because the compiled locale definitions for the
> requested locale aren't available
On 06/14/2016 09:26 AM, Greg Olsen wrote:
On 2016-06-13 01:28, Simon Walter wrote:
[snip]
> > This might be a bit surprising but I actually wrote lxc-devuan with
> > *non-Devuan* OS's in mind. To not discourage people from running
Devuan,
> > it automatically downloads and uses the Devua
On 2016-06-13 08:23, Jaromil wrote:
> we can create a group (named lxc?) and make you admins for it, or
> simply a single project as there may be no need for more packages.
>
> i'm cc: hellekin to stimulate a quicker response on what should be the
> naming scheme, since so far it has been curated
On 2016-06-13 01:28, Simon Walter wrote:
[snip]
> > This might be a bit surprising but I actually wrote lxc-devuan with
> > *non-Devuan* OS's in mind. To not discourage people from running
Devuan,
> > it automatically downloads and uses the Devuan keyring. Without that
> > capability it won't
Hi Folks,
I just pushed an update to lxc-devuan.
This adds support for LXC versions <= 1.0.8.
LXC version 1.1.0 came with the updated config that caused the previous
problem.
Greg
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.or
It would be nice to have palemoon, they are pretty open to choice and are
specifically against adding any DRM support in their browser. Also, it works
with XUL and doesn't have the bloat that Iceweasel does that is annoying people
in later releases. I have heard Debian will follow the ESR releas
This is a bit of itch scratching on my part but hopefully can become useful to
people wondering how to help out with devuan packaging. Just the basics here
and an unofficial list of packages that haven't had systemd removed yet, can't
catch all of these as I can only tell what is on github and d
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:49:45 +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 13/06/2016 22:49, Irrwahn a écrit :
[...]
>> I'm probably missing something important here, so I have
>> to ask: What would be the point in replacing an easily
>> comprehensible, self-contained and statically linked piece
>> of code[1] by
Le 13/06/2016 22:49, Irrwahn a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:47:49 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
Then I'd write a shellscript workalike for Suckless Init. In my
opinion, once you've done that, you should publicize it like the Autumn
leaves, because you've done a service to all of Linuxdom, and
Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:14:00PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> > But I still am convinced with a signed kernel one can still use it to
> > boot any installed OS. My reasoning goes like this: once the signed
> > kernel boots, it would be in contro
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:47:49 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
> Then I'd write a shellscript workalike for Suckless Init. In my
> opinion, once you've done that, you should publicize it like the Autumn
> leaves, because you've done a service to all of Linuxdom, and you've
> especially done a service
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:14:00PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> But I still am convinced with a signed kernel one can still use it to
> boot any installed OS. My reasoning goes like this: once the signed
> kernel boots, it would be in control of the machine. A running kernel
> can be used to run
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:37:44 +, Noel Torres wrote:
> Hi folks...
>
> Where can I find a *good* and *deep enough* explanation of what a
> "shim" is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shim_%28computing%29
In short: A shim is an adaptation or compatibility layer
that enables software to use func
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:37:44 +, Noel wrote in message
<20160613193744.horde.6as5qe3gnqf8zk7lci_w...@rolamasao.org>:
> Hi folks...
>
> Where can I find a *good* and *deep enough* explanation of what a
> "shim" is (in the context of systemd and EFI), but also *easy
> enough* to explain it to
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> But I still am convinced with a signed kernel one can still use it to
> boot any installed OS. My reasoning goes like this: once the signed
> kernel boots, it would be in control of the machine. A running kernel
> can be used to run any executable provided the latter is co
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:16:44 +0200
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
> DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
> ignore it.
>
> Till now, I implemented a little OS initiator that calls "/bin/bash"
> and t
Hi folks...
Where can I find a *good* and *deep enough* explanation of what a
"shim" is (in the context of systemd and EFI), but also *easy enough*
to explain it to some colleagues at work?
Thanks
Noel
er Envite
binRBqUCRGrNw.bin
Description: Clave PGP pública
___
Hi SteveT,
GRUB2 has a small kernel, on can always replace that with a full blown
signed kernel and this would not introduce another step in the boot
procedure.
Edward
On 13/06/2016, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SteveT wrote:
> <<
> Most of those remaining in the Debian user world are pure i
Hi,
SteveT wrote:
<<
Most of those remaining in the Debian user world are pure idiots.
They'll pull any old pseudofact out of thin air, and state it as an
absolute truth.
Notice that his web reference's date is October 2012. Last time I
googled this subject (probably 9 months ago), DIY secure boo
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:00:13 +0200
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In line with: <<
> That way only the big distros will be able to provide a bootable OS
> and the poor DIY guy will be definitely disgusted. This EFI thingy
> will in no way improve the security. It is a pure fallacy.
>
> We
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:47:13 +0200, Emninger wrote:
[...]
> Now, looking for lxsession-logout tool (which i did not
> find btw!?!?)
It is provided by the lxsession package.
> i checked task-lxde-desktop and i see it pulls in lots of
> dependencies which imho are *NOT* needed:
>
> - yelp
> - yel
KatolaZ writes:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:39:49AM -0400, Greg Olsen wrote:
>> On 2016-06-10 08:59, Simon Walter wrote:
>>[snip]
>> > > I will give the templates a go now.
>>
>> >I had some issues:
>> >perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
>> >perl: warning: Please check that your locale se
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 05:49:11PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 12/06/2016 17:08, Simon Hobson a écrit :
> >Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> >>How *do* we deal with secure boot? I am terrified of buying a new
> >>machine because I'm afraid I won't get to install anything on it
> >>wxcept for an OS fr
Trying to install the gtk2 engines i' am getting the following error
msg:
-
There is missing a final linefeed in the filelisting file of the
package
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpgk returned an error code (2)
-
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.or
Sorry if i am coming back to task-lxde-desktop:
Finally - and i really do not understand how, but anyway - i succeeded
installin devuan ascii on qemu. I did not install any desktop, but
started from the base installation and installed manually xorg, jwm,
menu and lxdm. Now, looking for lxsession-
Hi,
Many thanks for your replies especially for:
https://felipec.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/init/
Edward
On 13/06/2016, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 13/06/2016 08:16, Edward Bartolo a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
>> DNG's admins/mods deem thi
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:55:42AM -0400, Greg Olsen wrote:
> I very much appreciate the work that's being done by everyone here with
> Devuan, and I thought it would be good to give back in some way.
>
> This is a little something for those who use, or want to use, Devuan LXC
> containers.
>
> R
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:23:17PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to report that I've installed Devuan on a "rooted" Android device
> using DebKit.
>
> All I did was:
> 1. Change the package mirror to: auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged
> 2. After the debootstrap process is complete a
Le 13/06/2016 08:16, Edward Bartolo a écrit :
Hi,
This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
ignore it.
Till now, I implemented a little OS initiator that calls "/bin/bash"
and then enters an infinite whil
Hi all,
You can verify the purity of the tarball of the kernel of gnuinos in a
very easy way:
Download the sources from the .deb repository of gnuinos:
wget
http://gnuinos.org/linux-libre/pool/main/l/linux/linux_4.3.5.orig.tar.bz2
Check the md5sum:
$ md5sum linux_4.3.5.orig.tar.bz2
13d359
On 13/06/16 16:19, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:16:44AM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
Hi,
This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
ignore it.
If you really want to create yet another
Hi all,
I want to report that I've installed Devuan on a "rooted" Android device
using DebKit.
All I did was:
1. Change the package mirror to: auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged
2. After the debootstrap process is complete and under the chroot
install the devuan-keyring package.
I tried to use s
hi,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Simon Walter wrote:
> I've made an account on git.devuan.org (user: smwltr) How do you want to do
> this? Shall I fork your repo and apply a patch and then send you a pull
> request?
we can create a group (named lxc?) and make you admins for it, or
simply a single proje
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:16:44AM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
> DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
> ignore it.
If you really want to create yet another init, I can recommend this
simpl
On 13/06/16 15:29, KatolaZ wrote:
If I can provide my 2 cents to the discusion, before writing a new
init you should have studied and understood very well one of the
existing ones, and what should happen behind the scenes from the
moment your kernel is decompressed to the appearance of a login
t
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:16:44AM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a question about implementing a minimal OS initiator. If
> DNG's admins/mods deem this email is misplaced please delete it or
> ignore it.
>
> Till now, I implemented a little OS initiator that calls "/bin/bash"
>
53 matches
Mail list logo