On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:14:00 +0200 Edward Bartolo <edb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I still am convinced with a signed kernel one can still use it to > boot any installed OS. My reasoning goes like this: once the signed > kernel boots, it would be in control of the machine. A running kernel > can be used to run any executable provided the latter is coded for the > same machine architecture. So, the boot procedure would first consist > of UEFI loading the signed kernel, the kernel then loads a bootloader > like GRUB*. > > What do you think? It may look an ugly workaround like most > workarounds, but there is no logic why it should fail. Try it. If it turns out to be that easy, all of Linuxdom will give you a tickertape parade. By the way, I'm pretty sure the Grub would need to be signed too. SteveT Steve Litt June 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother? http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
