Ticket #399 (Bigint field object needed) status

2007-07-09 Thread Peter Nixon
h has not been applied in one form or another? Partial/imperfect support for BIGINT would IMHO be better than nothing.. Regards -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this me

Re: Ticket #399 (Bigint field object needed) status

2007-07-09 Thread Peter Nixon
e record here as well: It's > likely that the patch wouldn't be applied so long as it affects only > one backend - fields have to be consistent across all of them (partial > is /not/ better in cases like that). :) > > On Jul 9, 1:47 pm, Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Ticket #399 (Bigint field object needed) status

2007-07-10 Thread Peter Nixon
l > is /not/ better in cases like that). :) > > On Jul 9, 1:47 pm, Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Guys > > > > I am a relative newcommer to the Django world (a couple of months), so > > this is my first post to the list. Let me first say how qu

Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-10 Thread Peter Nixon
urrent SVN snapshot when running under mod_python How can I debug this in a way that will provide the developers with more usefull info? Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You rec

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-10 Thread Peter Nixon
On Tue 10 Jul 2007, Peter Nixon wrote: > Hi Guys > > There seems to be a problem in current SVN trunk that causes the > "Development server" to exit whenever I hit one of my views which access > the database. > > It doesnt do it with a 0.96 > It doesnt do it wi

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-11 Thread Peter Nixon
On Wed 11 Jul 2007, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On 7/10/07, Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How can I debug this in a way that will provide the developers with more > > usefull info? > > The best way to help us debug this would be to produce a minimal &g

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-11 Thread Peter Nixon
Cross posted to -devel as this is definitely a bug On Wed 11 Jul 2007, Peter Nixon wrote: > On Wed 11 Jul 2007, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On 7/10/07, Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How can I debug this in a way that will provide the developers with

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-11 Thread Peter Nixon
>>> a = Test.objects.all() >>> a Aborted testprj> Regards Peter On Wed 11 Jul 2007, Paul Bowsher wrote: > I may be blind, but I can't see anywhere you've actually specified what > the bug is. What behaviour is exhibited? > > On 7/11/07, Peter Nixon <[EMAIL P

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-07-11 Thread Peter Nixon
e django unicode branch as django SVN rev 5608 and earlier work fine on SUSE 10.3 alpha Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users&qu

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-08-27 Thread Peter Nixon
10.3 (X86-64) Beta2". Given that openSUSE 10.3 is going to be released soon, and that this is a 100% repeatable problem which only occurs post the unicode merge in Django, I would really appreciate if one of the developers could take the time to have a look at it

Authenticating Django against FreeRADIUS

2007-08-27 Thread Peter Nixon
Maybe this code I whipped up tonight to teach Django to speak RADIUS will be usefull to someone... http://peternixon.net/news/2007/08/27/open-source/authenticating-django-against-freeradius/ Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net

Re: Problem in current svn TRUNK

2007-09-02 Thread Peter Nixon
On Tue 28 Aug 2007, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, Michael Radziej wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, Peter Nixon wrote: > > > On Wed 11 Jul 2007, Michael Radziej wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > you're using the alpha version of S