On Apr 13, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Eric Walstad wrote:
> I'll be there IF it's on Thursday, April 27 (as mentioned in your
> mail to the
> django-users list). If it's on Wednesday (as mentioned on your web
> page), I
> won't be able to make it. Please clarify this.
Thanks for catching that; I did
On Apr 18, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Gábor Farkas wrote:
> everything seems to work fine, but i'm a little afraid of touching
> those
> tables (content-type and package).
>
> can anything "bad" happen if i add custom entries to them?
Nothing "bad" per-se will happen; there are no real assumptions made
Howdy fellow Djangonauts --
Django has just been approved as a sponsoring org for the Google
Summer of Code. I've put details on our wiki at http://
code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2006.
If you'd like to be a mentor, you can sign up at http://
code.google.com/soc/mentor_step1.html;
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:45 AM, Clint Ecker wrote:
> Hey everyone, I'm not considering this a "problem" so much as it's
> annoying. I moved a project I'd been running locally under
> mod_python to a
> shared server (on Dreamhost) using fcgi. I've noticed that when I
> first
> visit the site, it
On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:06 AM, oggie rob wrote:
> Any ideas what I am facing here? Or how to debug this?
I'd suggest switching to the "prefork" MPM for Apache; I've always
seen better performance and stability running Django under it as
opposed to the threaded one. Don't know if that's you're
Howdy folks --
Google's opened up the Summer of Code student application process, so
if you (a) are a student (at any level) and (b) want to make $4500
this summer hacking on Django, go apply!
All the Django-specific info is over at http://code.djangoproject.com/
wiki/SummerOfCode2006 and t
On May 3, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> I think, from the lead-in, that this was given to the Bay-area Python
> user's group, who happen to meet in Google's facilties. Very cool,
> but not quite the same as pitching Django to Google's own engineers.
>
> I'd love to be wrong. ;-)
Oh,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Why does it do this? It seems like it should just take the string I passed
> it and stick that into the header, no?
No - that might seem intuitive, but it's incorrect. The HTTP standard
specifies that the Location header should contain an abso
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> However, I believe it's not actually Django doing the rewriting.
Scratch that: I'm wrong. Actually, Django *is* doing the re-writing:
see
https://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/http/utils.py#L11.
Sti
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Tomek Paczkowski wrote:
> Hi, I cannot find any good source on how test reusable apps. I poked around
> and found out that people (django-registration, south) tests on blank
> project.
> This seems kind of wrong having to make some outside directory to be able to
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> Do I just need to do a little more pre-processing in the view or can I
> accomplish what I'm trying to do?
The method you're looking for is ``only()`` (or perhaps its cousin,
``defer``):
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/query
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:12 AM, mohammed safeer.mtp
wrote:
> if a user hits “Refresh” on a page that was loaded via POST, that request is
> be repeated.
> is there any remedy for this problem??
No, you can't prevent a web browser from re-POSTing forms.
What you can do is prevent the browser fro
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Kayode Odeyemi wrote:
>> Hello friends,
>>
>> I don't know why Django is so unstable.
>
> I don't know why you cross posted this to django-developers.
Tom, the snarky tone is un-called-for and not OK. Cross-pos
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> it seems, that the django ORM can only do deletes which result in a lot
> of SQL-Queries to do "on delete cascade" in python code.
>
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/ref/models/querysets/#delete
>
> Is there a way to leave this up to
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> I've noticed that this doesn't often work in Django shell...
>
> x = MyModel.objects.all()
> x[3].some_field = "new value"
> x[3].save()
>
> Rather, I must often do this...
>
> temp = x[3]
> temp.some_field = "new value"
> temp.save()
>
>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Sells, Fred
wrote:
> I'm using a MySQL database and one table resides in a separate database
> than all the others. It's a generic logging table.
>
> I understand the use of the .using() method, but I wonder if there is a
> way to specify the alternative model in
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Mike wrote:
> will I still be able to use Django's ORM?
Yes, please see
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#django.db.models.ForeignKey.on_delete
and in particular DO_NOTHING.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Torsten Bronger
wrote:
> creecode writes:
>
>> I can't say for sure but for some time it seems to me that
>> searching has become more difficult. I can't put my finger on any
>> specifics. I have found that some phrases that are in my browser
>> form field cache
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:36 PM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> it is using the default sphinx search which is limited to one word
> searches.
That's true of the documentation you build locally, but the search on
docs.djangoproject.com uses Haystack with the Xapian search engine.
It's a proper search
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> thanks for the info - the search *has* improved, for example a search
> for get_FOO_display used to fail, it now succeeds. But I still need
> ddg's site search for multiword searches.
Can you be a bit more specific? If there's a bug I'd
Hey folks --
MediaTemple, our hosting provider for djangoproject.com, is going to
be taking our server offline Thursday night while they give us more
RAM.
The window for downtime is some time between 9PM and 4AM, though the
actual downtime itself should be less than an hour.
Since most people us
Hi Anderson --
First, I need to point out something:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Anderson wrote:
> 'password':
> u'pbkdf2_sha256$1$ObXZ2yN3HATp$3ADUPZrzdvQCkPdJPCakfzILAIF8lPbKgAZLiXm54UI=',
You just posted a password -- yours or one of your users -- on a
public mailing list.
PLEASE R
releases-issued/.
Sorry about the mixup!
Jacob Kaplan-Moss
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
Hello fellow Djangonauts,
We have difficult news: Malcolm Tredinnick has passed away.
Malcolm was a long-time contributor to Django, a model community member,
a brilliant mind, and a friend. His contributions to Django — and to
many other open source projects — are nearly impossible to enumerate.
Hi folks --
We've just released Django 1.5.1, a bug fix release that cleans up a
couple issues with last month's 1.5 release.
The biggest fix is for a memory leak introduced in Django 1.5. Under
certain circumstances, repeated iteration over querysets could leak
memory - sometimes quite a bit of
FYI - djangoproject.com is currently down, I'm investigating and I'll
try to have it back up ASAP.
In the meantime, if you need to get to the docs, you can hit up the
ReadTheDocs mirror: http://django.rtfd.org/
Thanks for your patience,
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscr
silient against any future outages like this.
Thanks for your patience!
Jacob
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> FYI - djangoproject.com is currently down, I'm investigating and I'll
> try to have it back up ASAP.
>
> In the meantime, if you need t
Hi folks --
I'm pleased to announce that we've just released Django 1.6 alpha 1,
the first in our series of preview releases leading up to Django 1.6
(due in August).
More information can be found on our blog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/may/26/django-16-alpha-1/
And in the re
Hi folks --
I'm pleased to announce that we've just released Django 1.6 beta 1,
the second in our series of preview releases leading up to Django 1.6
(due in August).
More information can be found on our blog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/jun/28/django-16-beta-1-released/
And in t
Hi folks --
At last week's Black Hat conference, researchers announced the BREACH
attack (http://breachattack.com/), a new attack on web apps that can
recover data even when secured with SSL connections. Given what we know so
far, we believe that BREACH may be used to compromise Django's CSRF
prot
Hi folks --
Today the Django team is issuing multiple releases -- Django 1.4.6, Django
1.5.2, and Django 1.6 beta 2 -- as part of our security process. These
releases address two cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities: one in a
widget used by Django's admin interface, and one in a utility func
It's not a bug; that is by design.
However, it's not perfect, so in 1.5 we added update_fields:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/ref/models/instances/#specifying-which-fields-to-save
Jacob
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Dong Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using Django 1.4.2. Please let
Hi folks -
We'll be doing some work on djangoproject.com (and associated sub-sites)
tomorrow, starting around 20:00 UTC. Expect some downtime, possibly as long
as an hour or so, starting around then.
During the downtime, as usual, you can find a mirror of Django's
documentation on Read the Docs:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Yuka Poppe wrote:
> I noticed this myself a while back; It was'nt django specific, and I dont
> know about IE, I generally try to avoid using that; But in case of Chrome,
> whenever it encounters a 404 error (or certain other conditions) it seems to
> decide the vi
Hi Jeff --
It's not you; we get a *lot* of spam, and so our spam filters are
overly aggressive.
You can get around 'em if you create an account. Just visit
http://www.djangoproject.com/accounts/register/, register, and then
log into Trac once you have the account set up.
Thanks, and sorry about
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Michael P. Soulier
wrote:
> I noticed that the request object is not passed to the database router, the
> intention seems to mainly be to route by model. I have a case where I want to
> route based on session data in the request. While I know that I can
> explicite
2011/4/19 Ján Vorčák :
> I've installed a django on my server (running on apache), but I've
> configured it to run using url like
> www.mydomain.com/django-application/
>
> Now when I access some url from django using absolute url it
> automatically redirects me to
> www.mydomain.com/someapplicatio
2011/4/19 Juan Pablo Romero Méndez :
> Is it possible to create unidirectional relations within django's orm?
>
> What I mean is a situation where a parent has a children_set of
> references to children, but the children don't have any reference to
> the father.
See the documentation for ForeignKe
2011/4/20 Ján Vorčák :
> PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
You really, really, really should upgrade to mod_wsgi. mod_python is a
dead project, and support for it be removed from Django in the
future. More importantly, you're not going to find a whole lot of
people who can help you
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Michael Radziej wrote:
> In SQL, it's something along
>
> SELECT ... FROM blog
> JOIN entry e1 on e1.entry_id = blog.id
> AND e1.pub_date <= ...
> AND e1.headline LIKE "%Easter%"
> AND NOT exists
> ( SELECT id from entry e2
> WHERE e2.entry_id
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> How is this possible based on the model below?
> d = Device()
> d.save()
> # no errors
> class Device(models.Model):
> propertyno = models.CharField('Property Number',
> max_length=10,
>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> "primary_key=True implies null=False and unique=True. Only one primary key
> is allowed on an object."
> So that unique=True part is inaccurate? Or is that, again, another thing
> that will fail only at validation?
Maybe this'll help::
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Rich wrote:
> I know it's possible to overwrite the Django admin templates by
> copying the templates to your local project. I want to modify the
> "add user" template but cannot seem to figure out which template it
> is. I want to create a button which will use A
Hi Jeff --
To make the admin work w/r/t sites, you'll need three things:
* An entry in the sites table.
* A setting SITE_ID set to the ID of the Site entry you'd like to use
(i.e. SITE_ID = 1).
* `django.contrib.sites` in your INSTALLED_APPS.
Check all three; I'll be you're missing one or two of
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Thanks Jacob -- does the site entry in the database have to be anything
> specific? We don't really use that. Just put any old thing in there via
> Admin in the development server?
Well, if you want all the parts of the admin to work correctl
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Satan Study Django
wrote:
> I can also use the direct sql query in the code. But on cellular it
> level does not seem right -)
Well, if it were me, I'd just use the raw SQL. I'd guess that about 5
to 10% of the time I find that my queries are better expressed in SQ
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Nge wrote:
> I already created a view and can extract data from database.But I have
> a problem. I don't know how to send to template and how to create js/
> ajax. Can you share me sample?
I've recently done a project that uses Ajax, jQuery, and Flot to do
some cha
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> How to ask an actual question so maybe someone can answer it.
Shawn, that's uncalled-for. I'm super-impressed with how much work
you're putting into answer people's questions here, and I really do
appreciate it. But this sort of thing isn't
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> How to ask an actual question so maybe someone can answer it.
Shawn, that's uncalled-for. I'm super-impressed with how much work
you're putting into answer people's questions here, and I really do
appreciate it. But this sort of thing isn't
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, CarlFK wrote:
> I am trying to curl pages that require being logged in via django's
> default auth. I don't care if the actual login is done with curl,
> python, firefox or whatever is easiest.
Are you wedded to curl for the download? If it were me, I'd use
someth
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Adam Seering wrote:
> I have some Python code that generates initial data for some of my tables; I
> currently call that code from a post_syncdb hook. In Django 1.3, it looks like
> Django now calls TRUNCATE (or an equivalent non-PostgreSQL-ism) on all tables
> afte
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Paweł Roman wrote:
> But does that mean that the django admin log is broken and cant be
> trusted? How come there isnt any trace of adding those items?
Well, I'd say "broken" might be a bit strong. Some cars drive 200 MPH,
but mine won't. Does that mean my car's "
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Weholt wrote:
> Hmmm ... maybe, but because of the reusable app focus in django I
> think some sort of guideline regarding choice of license could be
> important.
The problem is that license choice is one of those "holy wars" that
geeks get into -- vi/emac
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Boštjan Mejak wrote:
> This is getting way out of hand. I was hoping for a simple yes/no answer.
> And what I got? A bunch of yada yada.
This tone is uncalled for and borderline unacceptable here. You have
no right to demand anything from the people taking their
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Boštjan Mejak wrote:
> Where to put my license? In a file or in all the modules? I'll use MIT
> license. Do I need to disclose the source code?
I'm sorry, but I have a policy of not answering questions that are
asked rudely, and you're being incredibly rude. If y
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Nan wrote:
> I'm working on a site where about 95% of the pages are "static" and
> change no more than once a week, and should therefore be cached;
> however, there are a couple blocks in the base template (login forms,
> blocks that load randomized content, etc) t
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
wrote:
> go read the GPL and stop irritating everyone here.
Kenneth, that's uncalled-for -- please don't respond to rudeness with
more rudeness.
It's pretty clear to me that this discussion is incredibly off-topic
and that Bostjan has no interes
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm successfully using Apache with mod_authnz_ldap, WSGI, Django 1.3. If I
> hit
> '/admin', I get asked to authenticate (BasicAuth done through LDAP). I
> succeed.
> However, this just results in me then seeing the Django admin l
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> That gets us somewhere, because authenticating to Apache/LDAP as jblaine
> did NOT make a Django user jblaine.
That's interesting - perhaps LDAP is reporting a different username?
You could check in the auth_user table to see what's getting cr
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:15 PM, ydjango wrote:
> I am using Python 2.5, django 1.1 with mod_wsgi 2.5
>
> Does it matter if I use prefork or worker MPM for apache?
In general, worker will use less RAM, thus allowing higher concurrency
and usually higher perceived performance.
But take that sugge
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:00 PM, ydjango wrote:
> I remembered reading this long back - "Django requires Apache 2.x and
> mod_python 3.x, and you should use Apache’s prefork MPM, as opposed to
> the worker MPM."
That statement dates back to when Django wasn't threadsafe (so we're
talking pre-1.0
Hi John --
Next time, can you please try to be a bit more polite? If you adopted
this sort of tone in person I'd write you off as a crazy person and
get away as quickly as possible. What makes you think it's acceptable
here?
Most people -- and I'm one -- have a severe allergy to answering
questio
I think you're looking for http://www.djangoproject.com/community/.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Boštjan Mejak wrote:
> HTML source code can't be passed as a string. You morons.
This isn't OK. Stop it at once.
You've been warned about your tone once before. Please aim for a
professional, polite tone here or find another group to hang out in.
If you can't act
On Monday, May 30, 2011, BobX wrote:
> If anyone from the Django Project itself is listening then can I (very
> humbly) suggest that some editor recommendations would make a real
> fine addition to the info on the site (useful to n00b's like me
> anyway).
That's a good idea - thanks!
Where do yo
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
> I have several installed applications within my Hue environment. I'd like
> to use the multiple database support to route all database requests
> associated with apptwo.models into a database called "apptwo", while keeping
> everything el
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Oscar Carballal wrote:
> I've just created a PDF (5.6MB, 1042 pages) with all the django 1.3
> docs [|], just in case someone need it (sometimes it's useful to have
> the docs offline).
Also see http://readthedocs.org/projects/django/, which has got links
to PDF do
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Phui-Hock wrote:
> This question has been asked a few times, but is there a general set
> of best practices one should follow to secure Django admin site? A
> quick check on some of the Django powered websites leave /admin/ open
> to public access, and some don't e
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, CareerDhaba tech wrote:
> I am very new to Django just started working around with forms. I have been
> facing difficulty in getting a user registered. Anyways i was following
> steps given in James Bennet blog.
>
> http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2006/sep/02/django-t
Hi folks --
Also see http://simonwillison.net/2009/Jan/7/ratelimitcache/ for a
discussion of a similar technique built on top of memcached.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Hmm, some concerns:
Luckily, it's open source: https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com
-- patches welcome!
[If you want to add search to the community aggregator that'd make me
very happy; it's been on my todo list f
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:03 PM, br wrote:
> I am running on a Linode 768 VPS and may have some stuff going live
> before too long. I'm wondering what the best way to guage whether I
> have enough bandwidth/CPU/memory to handle a significant amount of
> traffic is and/or to get an idea of the typ
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rodney Topor wrote:
> I've been away from Django for over 6 months. Previously I was using
> 1.2.5. Now I'll be using 1.4 pre-alpha.
>
> Can someone please point me to a good summary of the main changes made
> between these two versions?
See https://docs.djangop
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> satchmo has become a bloated manatee of a codebase.
Hey, this isn't OK. I can tell you're frustrated, but insulting other
people's work isn't acceptable around here. You should realize there
are real people, just like you, on the other side
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:07 AM, cool-RR wrote:
> How do I change my user password on Django's bug tracker?
https://www.djangoproject.com/accounts/password/change/
If you've forgotten your password, see
https://www.djangoproject.com/accounts/password/reset/.
Jacob
--
You received this message
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Hold on, we are in danger of restricting the freedom of speech on this
> mailing list.
There is no right to free speech on a mailing list.
We already restrict what's allowed on this list. Beekeeping, wool
socks, hand g
Hi Bobby --
I'm quite sorry if you took my words as a threat. Such wasn't my
intent -- at all. I'm simply trying to make clear certain community
expectations. You're completely right that banning would be wildly
inappropriate, and I certainly wasn't suggesting that.
The Django community has histo
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:14 PM, nixlists wrote:
> How one would approach this? Do I iterate over the whole QuerySet,
> adding a calculated value to each object? What about pagination as
> done in the generic methods?
Well, without more details about your model(s) and what calculation
you'd like t
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, nixlists wrote:
> I need a view where for every row returned from Claim I make a
> calculation based on quantity from the Claim, rebate_pct and wac. Is
> it possible to write a model method that would access these fields
> from the other tables?
If I was in your sh
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Chris Fraschetti
wrote:
> I believe that in earlier versions of django if you added a view
> method to an admin, and extended the get_urls method that because it
> was under the admin it would automatically require at least a log in
> (user.is_authenticated()=True
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Jeremy Keeshin wrote:
> I have an Item model that has many Tags. If I delete a Tag, I want to make
> sure the related Items are not deleted. I tested this out on my local
> database, and it seems that there are no cascading deletes with many to many
> fields. Howev
Hi folks --
I'm starting the switchover to the new djangoproject.com server right
now. Might be around 5 mins of downtime or so.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegrou
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> I'm starting the switchover to the new djangoproject.com server right
> now. Might be around 5 mins of downtime or so.
Migration should be complete now. I'm still cleaning up a few
last-minute things, but if you notic
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> I'm seeing the code samples being cut off in the docs as well.
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/signals/
> See sample under:
> Preventing duplicate signals
It's working for me (Chrome/Safari OSX), so it's probably a
browser-spe
Howdy --
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:17 AM, dy wrote:
> # model in app test2,store to test2
> class Test2(models.Model):
> name = models.CharField(max_length=30,verbose_name="test2")
> test1 =
> models.ForeignKey('test1.Test1',verbose_name="FK_test1",blank=True,null=True)
Just to be sure I'm
Hi Andre --
This indicates that you don't have the development packages for
PostgreSQL. psycopg2 is written mostly in C, and needs to be compiled
and linked against PostgreSQL. It does this by running a command
called pg_config, which is part of the PostgreSQL dev package.
You haven't indicated w
Hi Tsolmon --
You can find documentation on Django's admin interface at
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/ref/contrib/admin/. It should
tell you enough to get started.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this gr
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Flo Ledermann
wrote:
> I was quite surprised that I couldn't find a way to override table
> names for an application's models on a per-deployment basis (i.e. in
> settings.py or some other project/site specific file instead of
> modifying the models.py file of the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Savio Sabino wrote:
> How I select what tables (in a db with 900 tables) has the model
> generated for inpectdb?
Sorry, but you can't: you'll need to run inspectdb and then edit the
generated code by hand to edit out the models you don't want.
Jacob
--
You rece
Hi Ryan --
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Ryan Osborn wrote:
> I am using django 1.3 and have the following in my models.py:
>
> class Entry(models.Model):
> title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
> slug = models.SlugField(unique_for_date='created')
> created = models.DateField(auto_
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Micah Carrick wrote:
> I have an application which handles a typical "checkout" process for an
> e-commerce website. Orders from online customers end up in several models
[... snip complex problem ...]
> Anybody have any tips, links to articles, etc. that
> might
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> As was suggested when you raised this on django-dev, if you want the
> old behavior, write a subclass of FileField that reintroduces the old
> behavior.
... and for those who're not reading over there, here's some code you
might try: h
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Malcolm Box wrote:
> On one of my models, the admin choice_list page is taking minutes to
> load, which makes it somewhat broken.
>
> The table has about 2M rows and about 2.6GB in size, on InnoDB/MySQL.
> As far as I can tell, what's breaking things is the paginat
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Tony wrote:
> Is there a way to use the "request.user" attributes in a custom model
> manager? So I could filter by certain attributes the current logged
> in user has? This is the preferable way I would like to filter the
> objects the user sees, so if there is
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, amadison wrote:
> It you run the test case against django 1.3 it blows up... in django
> 1.2.5 it passes.
Just a quick process point: it helps a lot if you post the actual
error you're seeing, traceback and all.
Unless Django's literally blowing up your computer,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Aaron Madison wrote:
> I'm not sure if attaching files straight through email will work or not...
I meant on the ticket. django-users is so high traffic that it's
likely that developers could miss stuff posted here, so giving all the
information needed on the ticke
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Dan Gentry wrote:
> Where I run into trouble is that the query returns data in columns,
> but not objects. That means that I can’t reference an object attribute
> using dot notation in my templates or views. Instead, I have to
> include each attribute that will be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:23 AM, sh...@bogomip.com wrote:
> IMHO (which is very H) _filter_or_exclude should be public. I can't
> find a compelling reason for it not to be other than it has never
> been.
Just go ahead and use it if you find it useful! The Python philosophy
is that we're all "co
Hi folks -
We've just published a short security advisory about ImageFields:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/dec/02/image-field-advisory/
ImageField expects a valid image file, but depending on your app it may
allow uploads on non-image content, such as HTML or JavaScript.
Unfortun
Hey folks --
We've just released Django 1.6.1, a bugfix release for last month's Django
1.6 release.
More details are in our blog post:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/dec/12/django-161/
and in the release notes:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/releases/1.6.1/
Enjoy!
401 - 500 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
