On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Hi Karen,
> i didn't want to bother you too much (because of that I dindnt send too
> much code).
>
But without specifics on the model involved here there's nothing more I can
think to tell you that might help. raw_id_admin on any (all) related ob
Hi Karen,
i didn't want to bother you too much (because of that I dindnt send too much
code).
I think these model are bad implemented. I have put the raw_id_admin
parameter to true but the point is that I have too many queries:
>>> len(connection.queries)
53
and some of them, all that goes to s
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
> sorry karen. I have tried both. First I put in teh forma_parte_de foreing
> key field but it has no discernible effect on performance. I even execute it
> via python console and you can see clearly that it takes long time to
> response.
>
> Then I t
sorry karen. I have tried both. First I put in teh forma_parte_de foreing
key field but it has no discernible effect on performance. I even execute it
via python console and you can see clearly that it takes long time to
response.
Then I tried to put the raw parameter in the many to many fields bu
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Miguel wrote:
> umm, raw_id_admin takes no effect. I think I have found the problem. As you
> said it may be in the model:
>
> Pattern_method model has this entry definition:
>
> metodos_embebidos =
> models.ManyToManyField('Plantilla_metodo_embebido',blank=Tru
umm, raw_id_admin takes no effect. I think I have found the problem. As you
said it may be in the model:
Pattern_method model has this entry definition:
metodos_embebidos =
models.ManyToManyField('Plantilla_metodo_embebido',blank=True,null=True)
and Plantilla_metodo_embebido has more than 10
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Miguel wrote:
> I don really understand the raw_id_admin issue. I have read the api but it
> is still not clear.
>
> You meant I could improve the behaviour by adding this paramter?
>
> forma_parte_de =
> models.ForeignKey('Plantilla_bloque',related_name='dentro_
I don really understand the raw_id_admin issue. I have read the api but it
is still not clear.
You meant I could improve the behaviour by adding this paramter?
forma_parte_de = models.ForeignKey('Plantilla_
>
> bloque',related_name='dentro_de',blank=True,null=True, raw_ide_admin=true)
And ma
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Miguel wrote:
>
> where should I put "raw_id_admin=True" ? in the foreing key declaration?
>
> forma_parte_de =
> models.ForeignKey('Plantilla_bloque',related_name='dentro_de',blank=True,null=True)
>
> and what implications does it have?
>
Sorry, I meant to inc
where should I put "raw_id_admin=True" ? in the foreing key declaration?
forma_parte_de =
models.ForeignKey('Plantilla_bloque',related_name='dentro_de',blank=True,null=True)
and what implications does it have?
thank you
Miguel
Sent from Madrid, Spain
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Karen
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Miguel wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have found an optimizing problem. I have a model which i would like to
> edit, when I call my method I do something like this:
>
>
> def method_modify(request, method_id):
>
> try:
>manipulator = Pattern_method.ChangeManipula
hi,
I have found an optimizing problem. I have a model which i would like to
edit, when I call my method I do something like this:
def method_modify(request, method_id):
try:
manipulator = Pattern_method.ChangeManipulator(method_id)
except Pattern_method.DoesNotExist:
r
12 matches
Mail list logo
