Leeuw van der, Tim wrote:
>By searching for 'threading' in the ticket-database I've found ticket
>1442, which provides a different approach: thread-local storage. (Each
>thread it's own connection.)
>
>
Yes, this is the fix that superseeded previous fixes for different
backends. It's much clea
By searching for 'threading' in the ticket-database I've found ticket
1442, which provides a different approach: thread-local storage. (Each
thread it's own connection.)
URL:
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/1442/django.threading.pa
tch
That patch works very well for me; didn't tr
Leeuw van der, Tim wrote:
>Hi Ivan,
>
>Thanks for your fast answer. I didn't get round to trying the changes
>until now and I suspect that the first link you sent me is for the wrong
>issue: it's a patch to make the default filters unicode-proof (adding
>encode/decode with default charset in lots
On 3/13/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:17 -0500, Waylan Limberg wrote:
> > I'm trying to format my dates with escaped characters in the format.
> > However, I can only seem to get them to work with the 'now' template
> > tag, but not the 'date' filte
Hi,
My first attempt at #22 is in trac.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22
It's just a quick thing that I needed. But I will welcome suggestions
and ideas how to make this better.
Best Regards
On 3/12/06, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> never go round to it - havent even st
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:17 -0500, Waylan Limberg wrote:
> I'm trying to format my dates with escaped characters in the format.
> However, I can only seem to get them to work with the 'now' template
> tag, but not the 'date' filter. Some examples:
>
> {% now "jS o\f F" %}
>
> will return '13
I'm trying to format my dates with escaped characters in the format.
However, I can only seem to get them to work with the 'now' template
tag, but not the 'date' filter. Some examples:
{% now "jS o\f F" %}
will return '13th of March' as it should. But if I do this in the template:
{{ po
On Monday 13 Mar 2006 12:47 pm, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Variables within variables aren't supported. To accomplish what
> you want, you'll have to write either a custom tag or filter.
> (It's easy enough to do.)
i cheated - made a template with a bunch of 'ifequals' and included
it. Inelegant b
On 3/14/06, Alan Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using 0.91, not the trunk, don't know how much of a difference thereis.It shouldn't make that much difference. There have been a some bug fixes applied to the trunk since 0.91, but for the most part, the big ticket bugfixes are in magic-removal
Great, thanks! I thought it might be something like this. Should have
dug a little deeper...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@go
All variables that you "get" from the request come back as strings. So
'2' != 2
You could just set show_only=int(show_only) before you pass it to the
template.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
Hi Folks,
I'm having some issues with {% ifequal %}. What I'm trying to do is
have a drop down list remember the values that are sent on a get
request that is sent to the same page. I pass the value of the variable
(show_only in this case) back to the template, and then I have this
statement in t
On 3/13/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 March 2006 15:20, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
> > (I'll insert the standard disclaimer here that magic-removal is not
> > ready for production use and is only for the faint of heart.)
>
> Only for the faint of heart? Or perhaps you mea
On Monday 13 March 2006 15:20, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> (I'll insert the standard disclaimer here that magic-removal is not
> ready for production use and is only for the faint of heart.)
Only for the faint of heart? Or perhaps you mean that *after* you've
tried it you'll be faint of heart? I
On Monday 13 March 2006 05:47, coulix wrote:
> hum to reformulate simpler,
> how can i tell in url.py to use generic.simple, and a extra_context
> which will replace
> context_instance=DjangoContext(request) i was using in my view
> method.
Generic methods use DjangoContext anyway -- you don't
On 3/13/06, Axel Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build a form with
> django.views.generic.create_update.create_object
> and I can't find a way to use a custom manipulator with it. Is it
> possible to pass
> a generic view a manipulator?
No, that's not currently possible. I'd r
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:14 -0600, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
On 3/13/06, Les Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My guess is that the DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE is set once only per server process,
> then its pot-luck which process and which DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE setting any
> particular reques
Hi,
I'm trying to build a form with
django.views.generic.create_update.create_object
and I can't find a way to use a custom manipulator with it. Is it
possible to pass
a generic view a manipulator?
Thanks,
Axel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
I'm trying to configure an Apache/mod_python server with two different Django projects that use different databases and different Django models/views/templates etc. They are entirely separate - all they have in common is that they run on the same Apache instance. My httpd.conf looks something l
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for your fast answer. I didn't get round to trying the changes
until now and I suspect that the first link you sent me is for the wrong
issue: it's a patch to make the default filters unicode-proof (adding
encode/decode with default charset in lots of places).
I don't see how tha
I'm using 0.91, not the trunk, don't know how much of a difference there
is.
Is there a patch I can apply to get this to work? I already tried
magic-removal thinking it'd be better to stay current, but that broke on
me in some ways too, like edit-inline not working, so I skipped that.
Thus this
i am still not following this..
here is the output from my show variables..
mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'char%';
+--++
| Variable_name| Value |
+--++
| characte
On 3/13/06, Les Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My guess is that the DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE is set once only per server
> process,
> then its pot-luck which process and which DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE setting any
> particular request gets.
Your guess is exactly correct. You'll need to use t
I just wanted to drop a note about a new app that I deployed.
I recently launched a prototype and users are happy.
Basically it uses the gamespy API to query gamespy for a list of active
game servers, then contacts each server in turn to obtain critical
stats (map being player, number of players
If I allow the "created_on" columns to be nullable it kindda works. The
second action I perform is performed succesfully, i.e. when I go back
into the "Account" detail and add 2 more "Project" child objects.
When look at the data in the database I see that the created_on column
has been left NULL
I have the same problem here. Manage to follow the tutorial till part
3. And any comments made to a particular post actually shown in all
posts. Still try to solve this problem. Guess Bryan advice might be
helpful, should look into details how django blog example in
code.djangoproject.com.
--~--
Hi,
I've got a master-detail relationship that I'm trying to get working in
the Admin interface. My models are as follows:
class Account(meta.Model):
name = meta.CharField(maxlength=100, null=False, unique=True)
email = meta.EmailField(null=False)
password = meta.CharFiel
On 3/13/06, Jeremy Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 0.9.1, I would run python manage.py init; python manage.py install
> {{insert desired model here}}. In magic-removal, there appears to no
> longer be an init argument to manage.py. There is also a new syncdb
> argument. Is the proper way
On 3/13/06, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, for the end-user interface, I wanted to go with a different
> look. I probably worded what I wanted badly: the key concept is that,
> for a Book model that has a many-to-many 'authors' field linking to an
> Author model, I want a UI fie
>From the http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/NewbieMistakes
Problem ¶
When you have a Field: current_zip =
meta.IntegerField(maxlength=5,blank=True)
django will create a not nullable field in the DB. However leaving the
field blank (in admin/web) django will try and insert a NULL value in
the D
Todd O'Bryan wrote:
>Is there any way to run the stuff Django needs from inside Python
>interactions,
>
There is. All those management method are located in
django.core.management. You can do it in python prompt like this:
import os
os.environ['DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE']='myproject.sett
Thanks for the reply, Adrian.
Yep, I have already got the admin interface to my model enabled, that's
how I got my initial data into the database.
However, for the end-user interface, I wanted to go with a different
look. I probably worded what I wanted badly: the key concept is that,
for a Bo
Malcom:
Sure thing. I'll see if I can whip up a testcase (be nice if it's
disappeared).
David Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, sen
Hi All,
I have a model something like this:
doctype_choices = (
('PDF','Adobe PDF'),
('WORD','Microsoft Word' ),
('EXCEL','Microsoft EXCEL'),
)
sector_choices = (
('All','All'),
('Social Recovery','Social Recovery'),
('Physical Infrastructure','Physical Infrastruct
Hey Tim,
Yeah, I understand what you mean, but I thought that django used "" by
default and not NULL. That's why I defined in my model to allow blank,
and not include null=True.
Part of the model is this:
class Factor(meta.Model):
20 first_name = meta.CharField(maxlength=25)
21
'blank=True' is not the same as 'null=True' !
Specify 'null=True' and null-values should be allowed on the column (you
should see that in de generated DDL, the clause 'NOT NULL' disappears
from the specs for this column)
That said, your RDBMS might still require you to fill in your foreign
keys,
Hello,
I am getting an IntegrityError:
ERROR: null value in column "factor_id" violates not-null constraint
INSERT INTO "products_companies" ("name","phone","factor_id") VALUES
('test','',NULL)
Although I have specified in its model, that I want to allow the
factor_id to be blank:
class Company(
Thanks guys.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
In 0.9.1, I would run python manage.py init; python manage.py install
{{insert desired model here}}. In magic-removal, there appears to no
longer be an init argument to manage.py. There is also a new syncdb
argument. Is the proper way to setup your db in magic removal to call
manage.py with syn
Hi Tony,
You should look for rename_by_field() in
http://djangoutils.python-hosting.com/wiki/Utils
--
Petar Marić
*e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*mobile: +381 (64) 6122467
*icq: 224720322
*skype: petar_maric
*web: http://www.petarmaric.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Hi,
You could look into an IDE like Eclipse, together with the PyDEV eclipse
plugin. I use this combination to develop for Django.
(There are some gotchas with code-completion; in some ways the
code-completion of PythonWin works better in combination with the magic
of Django models.)
Why I woul
Hi all!
I just discovered Django Saturday night and am very impressed.
Unfortunately, I'm in my second week of learning my way around
Python, so I'm running into newbie questions and would appreciate
some guidance.
First, the background. I teach at a magnet high school. We offer an
intro
Consider adding an extra table, 'item_type_extra_properties' or
something like that, used to store all those types of properties which
are not yet known at design-time.
--Tim
-Original Message-
From: django-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Tredinnick
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 11:10 +, Panos Laganakos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an item_type table which allows the user to add new types of
> items himself. Problem is that except the basic properties that are
> included in the item table, he might need to define item specific ones
> (properties).
Hello,
I have an item_type table which allows the user to add new types of
items himself. Problem is that except the basic properties that are
included in the item table, he might need to define item specific ones
(properties).
I discussed it a bit with a friend and talked about adding an extra
45 matches
Mail list logo
