By searching for 'threading' in the ticket-database I've found ticket 1442, which provides a different approach: thread-local storage. (Each thread it's own connection.)
URL: http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/1442/django.threading.pa tch That patch works very well for me; didn't try yet patch for ticket 900 but I think this approach is simpler to implement, and will have better performance. Another approach would be to use a connection-pool, but that would require a whole different API for programmers. Cheers, --Tim -----Original Message----- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Sagalaev Sent: dinsdag 14 maart 2006 7:29 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Django on Windows? Leeuw van der, Tim wrote: >Hi Ivan, > >Thanks for your fast answer. I didn't get round to trying the changes >until now and I suspect that the first link you sent me is for the wrong >issue: it's a patch to make the default filters unicode-proof (adding >encode/decode with default charset in lots of places). > > Oops... Missed a bookmark or something :-) Hre's the right one: http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/900/900.2.patch --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
