El 2022-03-06 01:10, netcitizen escribió:
>> On Friday, 4. March 2022 20:12, Quiliro Ordóñez [1] wrote:
>>
>> This is the message I sent to RMS.
>>
>> *
> I want to think you got explicit permission to post those messages
> here.
No. I did not. But I doubt Richard has any problem with publi
On 06/03/2022 07:10, netcitizen wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 4. March 2022 20:12, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
>
> This is the message I sent to RMS.
>
> *
>
> I want to think you got explicit permission to post those messages here.
>
> By the way, did FSFLA ever published something ab
El 2022-03-07 14:32, Daniel Pocock escribió:
> On 06/03/2022 07:10, netcitizen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 4. March 2022 20:12, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
>>
>> This is the message I sent to RMS.
>>
>> *
>>
>> I want to think you got explicit permission to post those messages here.
>>
>>
El 2022-03-07 17:28, faifl...@danwin1210.de escribió:
> With this, he basically painted himself into a corner where the distro
> design itself could be weaponised against freedom and he wouldn't comment.
> A bit unfortunate to set the goals of the Chief GNUisance to something so
> lax.
>
> If oth
