El 2022-03-07 14:32, Daniel Pocock escribió: > On 06/03/2022 07:10, netcitizen wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, 4. March 2022 20:12, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: >> >> This is the message I sent to RMS. >> >> ***** >> >> I want to think you got explicit permission to post those messages here. >> >> By the way, did FSFLA ever published something about Stallman's >> cancelation in 2019 or 2021? I haven't seen any, but maybe there is. >> >> Regarding my rather blunt response about RMS and LP, I was shocked by >> your justification for not speaking up, but that is only because I tend >> to judge things according to my own values. I would swim oceans across >> and climb mountains on bare feet to help a friend in need. To put it on >> a more realistic scenario, I would even use some non-free tool. In fact, >> even Stallman had to do it in order to help us; we wouldn't have GNU >> otherwise. >> >> "In 1983 I decided to develop the GNU operating system, as a free >> replacement for Unix. The feasible way to do it was to write and test >> the components one by one on Unix. But was it legitimate to use Unix for >> this? And was it legitimate to ask others to use Unix for this, given >> that Unix was proprietary software? [....] The conclusion I reached was >> that using Unix to put an end to the use of Unix was legitimate for me >> to suggest to other developers. I likened it to participating in small >> ways in some evil activity, such as a criminal gang or a dishonest >> political campaign, in order to expose it and shut it down." > > RMS has written an uncannily accurate description of the FSFE - when > exactly did he write those words?
The above message you cited is not from RMS. It is from netcitizen. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
