El 2022-03-07 17:28, faifl...@danwin1210.de escribió: > With this, he basically painted himself into a corner where the distro > design itself could be weaponised against freedom and he wouldn't comment. > A bit unfortunate to set the goals of the Chief GNUisance to something so > lax. > > If other people had decided to scrutinise distros instead, it wouldn't > matter if rms didn't. But they didn't either. Trisquel follows his example > of not caring about this issue either. Only Hyperbola takes such things > seriously.
I do not agree that he is a hostage. I think that he trusts those people. He really thinks they are good for freedom. The distro maintainers audit their own distros. They cannot be held accountable. I do agree that Hyperbola is the group which is most in favor of freedom. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
