Probably I'll choose openCL. It means that I must learn a new language,but it's
not bad..
>le to do either for this project. Have you
>checked the mailing list archives? Getting GPU-based processing into a
>GNU Radio flowgraph is quite hard, given the structure of the
>scheduler. Also, which eleme
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Martin Braun (CEL)
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:38:19PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I've a question(maybe this is spam): I'm thinking about my proposal,where I
>
> As long as you don't want an investment of 100 from us, it's
> probably
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:38:19PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've a question(maybe this is spam): I'm thinking about my proposal,where I
As long as you don't want an investment of 100 from us, it's
probably not spam :)
> want move some part on cuda( in this way,you can also
Hi guys,
I've a question(maybe this is spam): I'm thinking about my proposal,where I
want move some part on cuda( in this way,you can also see/verify the difference
in term of performance). Is cuda okay for you, or do you prefer openCL?
___
Discuss-gnu
>There seems to be another communication issue. :)
Great!!
>Sure, but then you are sharing your proposal with your potential competitors.
There's a discussion on the Google mentor list right now about how different
organizations handle this.
Yep,you're true..I didn't consider this aspect...
>W
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:40:12PM +0200, Jens Elsner wrote:
> >Kaushik. He will be my
> >mentor if my proposal will be accepted,isn't it?
>
> There seems to be another communication issue. :)
It's not guaranteed, but probably, yes, and he *is* the guy to ask re
feedback.
> >Thank you for your r
Hi 2_b_2,
Am 23.04.2013 19:09, schrieb 2_...@libero.it:
Yep,but my mentor told me to submit my proposal also to the
community.
Actually, he didn't. There seems to be a communication issue.
sorry, I have not explained well.not my mentor(because mentor aren't
assigned now), but the potential men
>>Yep,but my mentor told me to submit my proposal also to the community.
>Actually, he didn't. There seems to be a communication issue.
sorry, I have not explained well.not my mentor(because mentor aren't assigned
now), but the potential mentor for 802.11a/g, Ankit Kaushik. He will be my
mentor
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:10:57PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
> Yep,but my mentor told me to submit my proposal also to the community.
OK, just to clear this up:
You post your proposal on Melange. Proposals are private material and
should *not* be posted to this mailing list.
I just talked to
Am 23.04.2013 13:10, schrieb 2_...@libero.it:
Hi 2_b_2,
I think you should discuss this off-list directly with the designated
mentor.
Yep,but my mentor told me to submit my proposal also to the
community.
Actually, he didn't. There seems to be a communication issue.
For everyone: If you have
>Hi 2_b_2,
>I think you should discuss this off-list directly with the designated
>mentor.
>
Yep,but my mentor told me to submit my proposal also to the community.
By,
Marco Ribero
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://list
Thank you for your time.
Hi 2_b_2,
I think you should discuss this off-list directly with the designated
mentor.
Best regards,
Jens
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Hi all,
that is my first draft-proposal.
Please read it,and ask me clarifications,and tell me if you think that i must
change something,change idea or other..
Two point:
-I choose to not implement 802.11n because,following some research,it require
a lot of computation,or a really powerful graphi
>A 2D-Wiener filter is the best solution in the MMSE sense, but
>time-variant
>and depends on the current SNR. A good suboptimal solution might be 2D
>interpolation
>based on a precalculated (Wiener-) filter given the pilot positions and
>some reasonable
>assumptions on the time/frequency correlati
Something obvious (although you might not actually want it :) is a 2D
equalizer and higher modulation schemes.
MB
sorry,but i didn't understand..why an equalizer?ofdm don't requeire
it,is it?
The equalization step is easy - the hard part is channel estimation
given a
certain set of pilot symb
Hi all,
I'm still alive,don' t worry. Im reading more about 802.11.
About 802.11a/g: i thing that the best thing is write few block with a lot of
code inside,bacause gnu radio is stream oriented,while these wifi protocol
don't have a stream conception,but rather a structure frame(for istsance we
Hi Bastian,
> I want to:
> - add documentation
> - port to v3.7
> - move autocorrelation (i.e. frame detection) to FPGA
> - use more sophisticated algorithms
> - study OFDM branch and make use of that stuff
> - checkout performance counters and understand the performance bottlenecks
As Martin men
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:25:01AM +0200, Bastian Bloessl wrote:
> I want to:
> - add documentation
> - port to v3.7
> - move autocorrelation (i.e. frame detection) to FPGA
> - use more sophisticated algorithms
> - study OFDM branch and make use of that stuff
> - checkout performance counters and u
Hi,
On 04/11/2013 03:03 PM, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
If you base our work on that project, of course, I would be happy to help you
as good as I can!
Bastian Bloessl: thank you in advance for your disposability!!
can you tell me if and which problem present your code?
I can just tell you what I
>If you base our work on that project, of course, I would be happy to help you
as good as I can!
Bastian Bloessl: thank you in advance for your disposability!!
can you tell me if and which problem present your code?
>Also, don't format your emails as a reply, that makes them harder to
>read.
So
Hi Marco,
please read the GSoC-related email I just sent out.
Also, don't format your emails as a reply, that makes them harder to
read.
MB
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:23:18PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
>
>
> >Messaggio originale
> >Da: 2_...@libero.it
> >Data: 10-apr-2013 11.10
> >
Hi,
On 04/10/2013 01:23 PM, 2_...@libero.it wrote:
I read GSoC ideas on the gnu radio webpage, i found interesting the proposal
about 802.11a receiver and wireshark connector.
I just read about the project proposal in the Wiki and have seen that
Martin added a link to the 11a receiver that we
22 matches
Mail list logo
