On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:38:19PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote: > Hi guys, > I've a question(maybe this is spam): I'm thinking about my proposal,where I
As long as you don't want an investment of 1000000 from us, it's probably not spam :) > want move some part on cuda( in this way,you can also see/verify the > difference > in term of performance). Is cuda okay for you, or do you prefer openCL? I'm not sure you will be able to do either for this project. Have you checked the mailing list archives? Getting GPU-based processing into a GNU Radio flowgraph is quite hard, given the structure of the scheduler. Also, which elements are you hoping to accelerate? To answer your question, the more portable, the better, so my gut says OpenCL > CUDA. MB -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering Lab (CEL) Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun Research Associate Kaiserstraße 12 Building 05.01 76131 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-43790 Fax: +49 721 608-46071 www.cel.kit.edu KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
pgp36brA1BKdK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
