Hi Marco, please read the GSoC-related email I just sent out. Also, don't format your emails as a reply, that makes them harder to read.
MB On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:23:18PM +0200, 2_...@libero.it wrote: > > > >----Messaggio originale---- > >Da: 2_...@libero.it > >Data: 10-apr-2013 11.10 > >A: <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> > >Ogg: GSOC ideas [802.11] > > > >Hello, > >I'm Marco Ribero, an italian student and I'm following the third year of > >computer engineering at polytechnic of Turin. > > I'm writing you this letter because I'm interested in GSoC program, and > when > >I read GSoC ideas on the gnu radio webpage, i found interesting the proposal > >about 802.11a receiver and wireshark connector. > >Why?Because it could be a good application of my passed course in theory of > >signal,where I studied theory,but I didn't make anything of practice. > Anothor > >reason is that a lot of wifi card could receive from only one channel at time > >(eventually hoping from one channel to the next) and using sdr I could > manage > >more channel at time(if the receiver has enough band). And it could be a > nice > >challenge receive network packet using sdr instead of wifi card. > >I've a good knowledge of C/C++ and vb.net, and a discrete knowledge about > >python and java. I've also capacity with asp.net and php,but the graphics is > >not my favourite.I've a good knowledge of algorithm (i won a silver medal at > >the national olympics of informatics,10th), and I think that this project > could > >be a nice challenge for this summer. At the moment, I've only a cheap ezcap > >tuner for fun with SDRSharp, gnuradio and octave, then I'll ask you files > with > >captured wifi traffic,and also wireshark captures(for test). > >I've some questions: why do u consider only 802.11a, and not also 802.11g(if > >I'm not in wrong,they use the same modulation)? 802.11g is very common > (instead > >of 802.11b o n,one is legacy,the other is more complicated in my opinion) > and > >there are many device which can only receive 2.4ghz. Do you prefer a > realtime > >application,isn'it?however i think that the best thing is begin with a > module > >which isn't complety realtime,and pass data to the network sniffer using . > pcap > >files..when it work,I'll try to improve the module of gnuradio,and find an > >efficient way to pump data into wireshark directly.I know that for this > project > >i must improve strongly my knowledge about theory of signal, though i tooka > >very good vote in theory of signal, because my course didn't cover all > aspect, > >but I think it could be a nice opportunity to improve my skills. > >And in any case, I must have a good knowledge for futere jobs. > > > >I'll be very thankful with you if you give me this possibility, and I ask > you > >to tell me what I should do to discuss more about this project > > > >Sorry for my English not drinkable, and thank you for ur time, > >Marco Ribero > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering Lab (CEL) Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun Research Associate Kaiserstraße 12 Building 05.01 76131 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-43790 Fax: +49 721 608-46071 www.cel.kit.edu KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
pgppdBS_PIcKM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
