Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Nemanja Trecakov
>sudo chown -R your-user-id whatever-your-directory-is Owner of the directories changed :) >Don't think of the computer/OS as an obstacle that gets in the way of what you're doing. Think of it as a long-term partner. >You should think of a new computer/operating-system as a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 08/30/2011 07:45 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote: >Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root* is a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling code >should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and understand Unix ownership/permissions rules,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Nemanja Trecakov
>Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root* is a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling code >should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and understand Unix ownership/permissions rules, so you don't end up in sill

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 08/30/2011 07:19 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote: Marcus, you were right - I did install the Xilinx ISE being root. However, when I tried to run the same command being root, the bash did not find the xtclsh. The next thing I did is to include the xtclsh into the PATH in .bashrc, but for root t

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Nemanja Trecakov
>This is wandering very far away from the core topic of Gnu Radio, and into "help with Xilinx Tools". You *may* find people on this list who >can help you, just by pure blind luck, or maybe not. > >From the looks of it, and I'm no TCL expert, it looks like it was unable to c

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 08/30/2011 05:15 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote: Hi list, I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the installation manual (http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4&locale=en&topic=release+notes), I found out that I did not appropriately set th

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Nemanja Trecakov
Hi list, I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the installation manual (http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4&locale=en&topic=release+notes), I found out that I did not appropriately set the environment variables. It should be done with

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2

2011-08-30 Thread Nemanja Trecakov
Hi list, now I got a Linux copy of Xilinx 12.4 and I tried to build the UHD fpga image on ubuntu 10.04. with uhd version: UHD_003.001.002-ba0e3c8 I added the .bashrc to include xtclsh like this: #Include Xilix xtclsh in te path in order to be able to build FPGA images! XILINX_ROOT=/opt/Xilinx/1

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 30/08/2011 3:08 PM, Frankie Rawlins wrote: The dongle is available from England see http://www.hamradio.co.uk/acatalog/AMSAT-UK.html They export world wide. Frank South Coast England Yup, I'm very much aware of the FCD, although others on this list might not be. But this Miric 3101 thing

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Frankie Rawlins
The dongle is available from England see http://www.hamradio.co.uk/acatalog/AMSAT-UK.html They export world wide. Frank South Coast England > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:53:25 -0400 > From: mle...@ripnet.com > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any exper

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 30/08/2011 2:12 PM, Eric Brombaugh wrote: I never heard back from them. YMMV. If you do I'd certainly be interested in learning more - it looks like useful stuff. Eric Indeed, it looks like a FunCube Dongle, but with enough bandwidth to support applications like NTSC analog TV. That mak

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Eric Brombaugh
On 08/30/2011 10:55 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 30/08/2011 1:47 PM, Eric Brombaugh wrote: On 08/30/2011 10:32 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: I tripped over this today: http://www.mirics.com/fm_files/Mirics_MSi3101_June10.pdf Looks a little like a FunCube dongle, but with a larger device-to-host

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 30/08/2011 1:47 PM, Eric Brombaugh wrote: On 08/30/2011 10:32 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: I tripped over this today: http://www.mirics.com/fm_files/Mirics_MSi3101_June10.pdf Looks a little like a FunCube dongle, but with a larger device-to-host bandwidth. Anyone have any experience/more inf

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Eric Brombaugh
On 08/30/2011 10:32 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: I tripped over this today: http://www.mirics.com/fm_files/Mirics_MSi3101_June10.pdf Looks a little like a FunCube dongle, but with a larger device-to-host bandwidth. Anyone have any experience/more information about this device? I've been tracki

[Discuss-gnuradio] Anyone have any experience with this device

2011-08-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
I tripped over this today: http://www.mirics.com/fm_files/Mirics_MSi3101_June10.pdf Looks a little like a FunCube dongle, but with a larger device-to-host bandwidth. Anyone have any experience/more information about this device? ___ Discuss-gnur

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Discuss-gnuradio Digest, Vol 105, Issue 30

2011-08-30 Thread Zhonghua
On 08/30/2011 06:01 PM, discuss-gnuradio-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Send Discuss-gnuradio mailing list submissions to discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio or, via email, send a messa

[Discuss-gnuradio] 52mhz clock patch

2011-08-30 Thread Walter Barmak
hi, i'm about to buy the 52mhz clock and was wondering whether i need to patch my gnuradio which is the git version (gnuradio + uhd). according to what i've read, i have to create a file with the following: " diff --git a/usrp/host/lib/usrp_basic.cc b/usrp/host/lib/usrp_basic.cc index 5b2f7ff..8f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "superblock" concept / idea

2011-08-30 Thread Nick Foster
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Michael Dickens wrote: > On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Marcus D. Leech > wrote: > >> One idea, which I credit to a conversation I had with Frank Brickle some > >> months ago, is the ability to synthesize a ne

[Discuss-gnuradio] "superblock" concept / idea

2011-08-30 Thread Michael Dickens
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: >> One idea, which I credit to a conversation I had with Frank Brickle some >> months ago, is the ability to synthesize a new block using a collection >> of sub-blocks, and have it be "effic

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Martin Braun wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:19:39PM -0400, Tuan (Johnny) Ta wrote: >> Very interesting ideas. Thanks Marcus for sharing! Unfortunately I don't have >> enough background in compiler to implement such ideas. I'm in the phase of >> learning GNU Ra

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Tuan (Johnny) Ta wrote: > Scott, > I thought the frequency offset should be taken care of by the receiver > synchronization? The 802.11 NIC don't have external reference but they can > still sync to the AP. > Thank you, > Johnny The standards will specify the freq

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 08/29/2011 08:31 PM, Tuan (Johnny) Ta wrote: > > I'm very excited for the upcoming conference. The issue is I haven't worked > on GNU Radio for almost a year. And I see that there're quite a few changes. > Even when I was working with GN

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Tuan (Johnny) Ta
Scott, I thought the frequency offset should be taken care of by the receiver synchronization? The 802.11 NIC don't have external reference but they can still sync to the AP. Thank you, Johnny On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Scott Johnston wrote: > If you are having frequency offset problems,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Scott Johnston
If you are having frequency offset problems, you need to synchronize the USRPs with an external reference, i.e. a GPS receiver. Scott Tuan (Johnny) Ta wrote: Martin, Thanks for the suggestion! I think it's a good idea. I remember having a lot of problems with the OFDM receiver. The frequency

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Tuan (Johnny) Ta
Martin, Thanks for the suggestion! I think it's a good idea. I remember having a lot of problems with the OFDM receiver. The frequency offset between the 2 oscillators screwed things up. Looking around, I don't think this issue has been resolved. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you, Johnny On Tue

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference 2011

2011-08-30 Thread Martin Braun
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:19:39PM -0400, Tuan (Johnny) Ta wrote: > Very interesting ideas. Thanks Marcus for sharing! Unfortunately I don't have > enough background in compiler to implement such ideas. I'm in the phase of > learning GNU Radio, keeping up with its fast development is already a big