Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Possible SDCC 2.6 issue on Intel Mac

2006-10-02 Thread Michael Dickens
Can you file a Trac ticket on this? It would be good to have the details above captured for future reference other than on the mailing list. I just did, though I think it's an SDCC / Intel-Mac issue, which is not GR's direct problem ("SEP"). Much like those Intel-Macs which don't work -

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Python function processing block

2006-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:08:00AM -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > Marcus Leech wrote: > > > There was discussion on the list a few months ago about adding the > > ability to hook a python function > > into the processing chain. I don't remember what the conclusion of > > that discussion was.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Dawei Shen's tutorials

2006-10-02 Thread Berndt Josef Wulf
Document states the date of May 19, 2005. It doesn't appear to be up-to-date. cheerio Berndt On Friday 29 September 2006 14:21, Eric Blossom wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:26:18PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote: > > The tutorials moved: > > http://www.nd.edu/~jnl/sdr/docs/ > > Unless they have rece

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Announcing GNU Radio Release 3.0 RC 1

2006-10-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Eric Blossom wrote: > There should be a (brief) NEWS file in the tarball. It was in the tree. > Johnathan, if it's not in the tarball, can you please add it to > EXTRA_DIST. It's there. Johnathan Corgan, AE6HO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Discuss-gnuradi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Announcing GNU Radio Release 3.0 RC 1

2006-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:16:01PM -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > Patrick Strasser wrote: > > > Would it be possible to compile something like a NEWS file with all new > > features, enhancements and fixes from the last version (2.8)? This could > > be done via the list. > > Eric and I discussed

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Possible SDCC 2.6 issue on Intel Mac

2006-10-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Michael Dickens wrote: > DarwinPorts recently updated SDCC from 2.4.0 to 2.6.0 . This works just > as before on PPC MacOS X 10.4.7 (and now .8). But (at least for me), > 2.6.0 dies compiling usb_common.c in usrp/firmware/lib . Reverting back > to 2.4.0 does the trick. Any other Intel-OSX users

[Discuss-gnuradio] Possible SDCC 2.6 issue on Intel Mac

2006-10-02 Thread Michael Dickens
DarwinPorts recently updated SDCC from 2.4.0 to 2.6.0 . This works just as before on PPC MacOS X 10.4.7 (and now .8). But (at least for me), 2.6.0 dies compiling usb_common.c in usrp/firmware/lib . Reverting back to 2.4.0 does the trick. Any other Intel-OSX users find this? - MLD ps>

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem in SVN using Cygwin.

2006-10-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Pascal Charest wrote: > I had a similar problem and this is the solution that I used. > > At work, my computer is behind a firewall and I must use a proxy server > to send HTTP requests. So, I needed to set proxy name and address for > SVN. So, edit ~/.subversion/servers. In the [global] section,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem in SVN using Cygwin.

2006-10-02 Thread Pascal Charest
I had a similar problem and this is the solution that I used. At work, my computer is behind a firewall and I must use a proxy server to send HTTP requests. So, I needed to set proxy name and address for SVN. So, edit ~/.subversion/servers. In the [global] section, use these lines: [global] http-p

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New DarwinPorts script

2006-10-02 Thread Michael Dickens
Looks like DP fixed the issue ... I'm compiling on a new 20" iMac, and everything looks good. So I'm removing those version-specific commands from the OSX install script (new one is already uploaded, and requires -NO- changes to what DP does, yay!). On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:22 AM, Thomas Schmi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Python function processing block

2006-10-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Johnathan Corgan wrote: [snipped] Marcus--I hope you'll see this on the list, as your mail system at your employer filtered my direct copy to you. Looks like my mail server ended up on someones' RBL list. Johnathan Corgan, AE6HO [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Python function processing block

2006-10-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Marcus Leech wrote: > There was discussion on the list a few months ago about adding the > ability to hook a python function > into the processing chain. I don't remember what the conclusion of > that discussion was. > > I have a need to be able to hook a user-defined Python code snippet into

[Discuss-gnuradio] IEEE Spectrum

2006-10-02 Thread Lee Patton
Congrats to Matt and Eric for the writeup in IEEE Spectrum! http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct06/4654 ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

[Discuss-gnuradio] Python function processing block

2006-10-02 Thread Marcus Leech
There was discussion on the list a few months ago about adding the ability to hook a python function into the processing chain. I don't remember what the conclusion of that discussion was. I have a need to be able to hook a user-defined Python code snippet into the processing chain, near th