On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
Hi Jesse,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>>> Hi Jesse,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
> In
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>> Hi Jesse,
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virt
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
>>> In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virtualized
>>> environment. Maybe you can try this patch if you
@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
Hi Jesse,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
>> In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virtualized
>> environment. Maybe you can t
Hi Jesse,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
>> In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virtualized
>> environment. Maybe you can try this patch if you are interested:
>>
>> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/de
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han wrote:
> In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virtualized
> environment. Maybe you can try this patch if you are interested:
>
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-May/040027.html
This message seems to be have been taken by my
On 5/13/14, 2:00 AM, Yinpeijun wrote:
if needed, we should increase PYH NIC MTU or decrease VM NIC MTU ?
Increase the physical NIC MTU to 1550; this will be more compatible
since the VMs will be able to use standard 1500 MTU. Be sure the
physical switches have jumbo frames enabled.
--
Wes
Hi Yinpeijun,
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 02:13 +, Yinpeijun wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:45:33 +0100
> >From: Igor Sever
> >Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
> >To: Jesse Gross
> >Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org"
> >Message-ID:
> >
>> >This is due to the tunnel outer header that adds VXLAN + UDP + IP + ETH =
>> >50 bytes to the inner packets. When TCP stream is tested between VMs, TCP
>> >buffer is segmented to 1500 bytes, but with outer header added, it will be
>> >1550 that slightly exceed PHY NIC MTU, and results in an
Hi,
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 07:00 +, Yinpeijun wrote:
> >> >Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
> >> >To: Jesse Gross
> >> >Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org"
> >> >Message-ID:
> >> >
> >> >
> >&
>> >Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
>> >To: Jesse Gross
>> >Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org"
>> >Message-ID:
>> >
>> >
>> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >
>> >I man
Hi Yinpeijun,
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 02:13 +, Yinpeijun wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:45:33 +0100
> >From: Igor Sever
> >Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
> >To: Jesse Gross
> >Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org"
> >Message-ID:
> >
>Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:45:33 +0100
>From: Igor Sever
>Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] VXLAN problems
>To: Jesse Gross
>Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org"
>Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>I managed to solve this
I managed to solve this by setting VM NIC MTU to 1400, 1450 wasn't enough.
Thanks.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Igor Sever wrote:
> I tried to implement tunneling between KVM virtual machines on two hosts
> that are using public IP-s but are on the same LAN (Hetzner provider).
> Virtual machines on both hosts are using same private 192. network.
>
> I installed and configur
I tried to implement tunneling between KVM virtual machines on two hosts
that are using public IP-s but are on the same LAN (Hetzner provider).
Virtual machines on both hosts are using same private 192. network.
I installed and configured Open vSwitch 2.0.0 on Centos 6.5. Standard
networking, brid
17 matches
Mail list logo
