On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Zhou, Han <hzh...@ebay.com> wrote: > In fact, MTU specified by VM doesn't make any sense in a virtualized > environment. Maybe you can try this patch if you are interested: > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-May/040027.html
This message seems to be have been taken by my spam filter, so I don't have the original copy. However, while it is good to prototype implementations in OVS, I don't think that it is really feasible to include these types of changes to the OVS VXLAN implementation at this time. The protocol isn't designed to be independently extensible so usage of reserve bits needs to be done by the authors rather than in an ad hoc manner. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
