Yepp, Ben has right.
There are a bunch of performance analyses on the Internet that presents
the throughput of software based switches, like OVS, using multiple cores.
If your traffic is really simple (like a packet generator's simple
pattern, i.e., when all header information are the same for
>
>
>
> OK.
>
> If you have time and the inclination, please feel free to experiment a
> bit with the definition of BUILD_ASSERT_TYPE to see if you can make it
> work without warnings.
>
Thanks for the pointers. I will give it a try.
Regards
Numan
__
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:16:22PM +0530, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for the information. This is exactly what I was looking for.
>
> My implementation involves around 3K dynamic MACs.
>
> Couple of questions,
>
> 1. MAC eviction on table full. I took a look at NORMAL action
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 08:52:15PM +0530, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote:
> I believe, at any of point time, only one flow can be processed in a
> bridge. We can't do multiprocessing here within a bridge. Correct me if am
> wrong.
This is wrong.
___
discuss ma
Hello,
I’m using 2 Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 LTS with the following:
- kernel: 4.4.0-28-generic
- OVS version: 2.5.0 (installed from ubuntu packages: openvswitch-common &
openvswitch-switch)
I’m configuring a GRE tunnel between OVS bridges running on each of the
machines with:
ovs-vsctl add-port
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the information. This is exactly what I was looking for.
My implementation involves around 3K dynamic MACs.
Couple of questions,
1. MAC eviction on table full. I took a look at NORMAL action Mac learning
code. It had implemented MAC eviction by giving fair share of entries fo
Hi Levente,
Thanks a lot for spending your time in figuring this!
I was looking for around 1000 ports between bridges.
I also tried something similar, 2500 ports between two bridges. It became
very slow, even the show and dump commands became show. I was also using
Intel E5 series.
Took an alte
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:03:34AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:17:24AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > I am seeing the below compiler warnings with GCC version 6.1 on Fedora
> > 24.
> > >
> > > $gcc --version
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:53:27PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:56:29AM -0600, Ken Evensen wrote:
> > I feel like this an amateur question, but I'll ask anyway. To what extent,
> > if any is IGMP implemented in OVS? If it is implemented, does it support a
> > true rendezvo
Hi,
I did not find any documented limit about the number of patchports, so I
wrote a simple script, which adds a predefined number of patchports and
some dummy rules into the flow tables to actually have some reason for
the whole stuff.
First, I tried to add 100 and 1000 patchports between t
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your comments!
I can try to use containers in my scenario.
Could you send me details on how to set-up your scenario (or a similar
one) using containers?
Best,
Lluis
On 03/07/16 03:06, Daniel Ye wrote:
Hi Lluis,
As I don’t have a test environment now, I tried with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
