On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:31:21PM -0700, Greg Dahlman wrote:
>
> Thanks for getting this out and it is working pretty well for me on
> wheezy so far, but there is one little fix that would help, Sorry if
> this is the wrong list I would have emailed the devel list but the git
> repo is way past t
Thanks for getting this out and it is working pretty well for me on wheezy so
far, but there is one little fix that would help, Sorry if this is the wrong
list I would have emailed the devel list but the git repo is way past this
release.
The Debian changelog needs to be 1.4.1-1 for those of u
* Jesse Gross (je...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] openvswitch: honour IFF_DONT_BRIDGE
> > From: Chris Wright
> >
> > Especially in the case of wireless, the netdev may not work properly.
> > So honor IFF_DONT_BRIDGE.
> >
> > Signed-
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
> Hi Ansis,
>
> I have opened a bug against libvirt ..
>
The domain XML file indicates that you are using Linux bridge not the OVS
bridge.
You are missing the tag. Refer to INSTALL.Libvirt for more
details.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Thanks Chris. I will try that out ...
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Srinivasa R Kanduru (skand...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Thanks a lot guys ! I was using kvm directly to launch VM as libvirt
> > (0.9.11.3) was giving an internal error even with a simple config file
> >
* Srinivasa R Kanduru (skand...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Thanks a lot guys ! I was using kvm directly to launch VM as libvirt
> (0.9.11.3) was giving an internal error even with a simple config file
> which replaces the default network with openvswitch.
Hmm, >= 0.9.11 should be good (I'm using 0.9.11
Hi Ansis,
I have opened a bug against libvirt ..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817404
attaching the tar file here ..
Thanks,
Srinivas.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot guys !
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Srinivasa R Kanduru (skand...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> The physical interface is a wireless NIC. I assume that shouldn't have any
>> bearing on the behaviour.
>
> Yes, it does. Seems that OVS ought to do something like:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] open
Well,
Am 04.05.2012 um 21:38 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:34:27PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
>> … showed the following:
>>
>> root@fcmsnode10:~# ovs-dpctl show
>> system@vmbr1:
>> lookups: hit:263209087 missed:904392 lost:0
>> flows: 5
>> port 0: vmbr1 (intern
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
> Thanks a lot guys ! I was using kvm directly to launch VM as libvirt
> (0.9.11.3) was giving an internal error even with a simple config file
> which replaces the default network with openvswitch.
>
> What error was that? Can you provi
Thanks a lot guys ! I was using kvm directly to launch VM as libvirt
(0.9.11.3) was giving an internal error even with a simple config file
which replaces the default network with openvswitch.
May I ask which version of libvirt that I should use ?
Regards,
Srinivas.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:00
* Srinivasa R Kanduru (skand...@gmail.com) wrote:
> The physical interface is a wireless NIC. I assume that shouldn't have any
> bearing on the behaviour.
Yes, it does. Seems that OVS ought to do something like:
Subject: [PATCH] openvswitch: honour IFF_DONT_BRIDGE
From: Chris Wright
Especially
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
> The physical interface is a wireless NIC. I assume that shouldn't have any
> bearing on the behaviour.
Wireless devices often do not allow MACs other than the one associated
with the access point.
__
Hi Ben,
It is happening without the controller removed too ..
$ sudo ovs-vsctl show
add5c761-9075-4f6d-8df2-a23c72062451
Bridge ovsbr
Port "tap0"
Interface "tap0"
Port "eth1"
Interface "eth1"
Port ovsbr
Interface ovsbr
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:34:27PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> … showed the following:
>
> root@fcmsnode10:~# ovs-dpctl show
> system@vmbr1:
> lookups: hit:263209087 missed:904392 lost:0
> flows: 5
> port 0: vmbr1 (internal)
> port 1: eth1
> port 4: vlan10 (interna
… showed the following:
root@fcmsnode10:~# ovs-dpctl show
system@vmbr1:
lookups: hit:263209087 missed:904392 lost:0
flows: 5
port 0: vmbr1 (internal)
port 1: eth1
port 4: vlan10 (internal)
port 7: tap410i1d0
port 13: tap433i1d0
port 1
You have a controller connected. The controller may be overriding the
default OVS behavior.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:27:22PM -0700, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
> Thanks ! Here is the output:
> $ sudo ovs-vsctl show
> [sudo] password for cloud:
> add5c761-9075-4f6d-8df2-a23c72062451
> Bridge
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:25:16PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> Am 04.05.2012 um 21:13 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:11:27PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> >> Am 04.05.2012 um 20:57 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrot
Thanks ! Here is the output:
$ sudo ovs-vsctl show
[sudo] password for cloud:
add5c761-9075-4f6d-8df2-a23c72062451
Bridge ovsbr
Controller "tcp:127.0.0.1:6633"
is_connected: true
Port "tap0"
Interface "tap0"
Port "eth1"
Interface "eth1
Mhm,
Am 04.05.2012 um 21:13 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:11:27PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
>> Am 04.05.2012 um 20:57 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
Does one have any experiences with workload for ca. 150 VMs, w
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:20:52PM -0700, Srinivasa R Kanduru wrote:
> I followed cookbook instructions to connect openvswitch to two VMs and to
> the host physical interface. The tap interfaces of VM and the physical
> interface on the host are added to the openvswitch bridge and I am able to
> p
Hi,
I followed cookbook instructions to connect openvswitch to two VMs and to
the host physical interface. The tap interfaces of VM and the physical
interface on the host are added to the openvswitch bridge and I am able to
ping between VMs and from VM to the host. But the packets are not going o
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:11:27PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> Am 04.05.2012 um 20:57 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> >> Does one have any experiences with workload for ca. 150 VMs, what
> >> das ovs-vswitchd say to this, with at least
That…
Am 04.05.2012 um 20:57 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
>> Does one have any experiences with workload for ca. 150 VMs, what
>> das ovs-vswitchd say to this, with at least one rule for every VM?
>
> It should be fine. We regularly use 10
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:42:25PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> Does one have any experiences with workload for ca. 150 VMs, what
> das ovs-vswitchd say to this, with at least one rule for every VM?
It should be fine. We regularly use 1 rules or more.
___
Hi Ben,
thanks for the quick response, I think I was too much affiliated with the
iptables-chains, which improves readability.
But, yes, each one table for all interfaces should do it.
Does one have any experiences with workload for ca. 150 VMs, what das
ovs-vswitchd say to this, with at least
I would try running tcpdump on the various interfaces in the system to
see where the tagged packets stop. It would help if you could distill
things down somewhat - there's really just too much information here.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, David Douard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to test Ope
I don't have further suggestions.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:11:02PM -0400, Ryan White wrote:
> Vboxnet0 is a virtualbox host-only adapter on the host side. By "route," I
> meant, on the guest VM, I typed "sudo ip route add default via 192.168.56.1
> dev eth0". On the guest side it appears as eth0
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:32:11PM +0200, Oliver Francke wrote:
> First try was then:
>
> ovs-ofctl add-flow vmbr0 'in_port=504 ip idle_timeout=0
> dl_src=00:00:AA:BB:CC:DD nw_src=192.168.1.35 priority=4
> action=resubmit(504,1)'
> ovs-ofctl add-flow vmbr0 'in_port=504 ip idle_timeout=0
> prio
No. "sudo ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0".
Ah, I misunderstood what you meant by configuring the gateway. What
kind of interface is vboxnet0? Normally, on a bridge (whether Linux
bridge or OVS bridge) you should only put an IP address on the bridge
interface (e.g. br0) or on special "internal" ports.
Hi,
first of all: I have things up n running, but it does not scale at the
end of the day.
Tasks:
- prevent user making trouble if he fakes MAC-address inside the VM
- prevent user making trouble if he fakes IP-address inside the VM
- continue with valid packet and "normal" firewal
That is what I meant. But you also have to remove the IP address from
wlan0.
I couldn't say whether vboxnet0 is the correct default gateway. Is
the Internet reachable through that interface?
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:26:26PM -0400, Ryan White wrote:
> " Did you move the IP address, if any, fro
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:09:45AM -0400, Ryan White wrote:
> I am a bit of a networking newbie, and I just want to get some simple Open
> vSwitch usage. For instance, is it possible for a laptop with Open vSwitch
> and VirtualBox, to connect its virtual machine to the internet using a VBox
> host-
Does the controller's listening socket appear in the output of
"netstat -l"?
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:17:23AM -0500, Anisha Kolasani wrote:
> Is there any way I could find out why the controller might be rejecting the
> connection? I would appreciate if somebody could give a suggestion.
>
> Th
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:39:41PM -0500, Anisha Kolasani wrote:
> How can the OVS be configured in --out-of-band control mode? Are there any
> documents I could refer too..?
What led you to believe that adding --out-of-band was the correct way
to configure this?
> I tried using 'ovs-openflowd' t
Seems all ports connected. Please post output of "ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0"
Please post output of ovs-vsctl get-controller
Actually you can use and setup flows without external controller. For such
thing use ovs-ofctl. If you setup external controller it will be responsible
for control flows
Hi,
I am trying to test OpenStack with Quantum using OVS. In my test
environment, the nova-network service run in a kvm VM on a host
dedicated to virtualization. Network on this host is built on linux
bridges.
The kvm host (hx4) is a Debian Squeeze box, running among others a guest
(essex) consis
Can you show output of "ovs-vsctl list bridge"
Thanks.
On May 4, 2012, at 17:09, "Ryan White" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a bit of a networking newbie, and I just want to get some simple Open
> vSwitch usage. For instance, is it possible for a laptop with Open vSwitch
> and VirtualBox, to co
Hi all,
I am a bit of a networking newbie, and I just want to get some simple Open
vSwitch usage. For instance, is it possible for a laptop with Open vSwitch
and VirtualBox, to connect its virtual machine to the internet using a VBox
host-only adapter bridged to wlan0, which is connected to the
Make sure you have removed the old IP addresses from ethX as well
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, 星言 墨虚 wrote:
> I have assigned IP address to br0, and let OpenvSwitch to connect
> controller. I can find the ARP Request packet and ARP Reply packet between
> OpenvSwitch and NOX by wireshark. But
40 matches
Mail list logo
