On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, kk yap wrote:
> I am not sure what is wrong here. Seems like a bug to me at this
> point. Any advice is appreciated.
It sounds like a bug to me, too. I'll try to look at this tomorrow.
--
"I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding
gettin
Hi,
I am OVS kernel datapath with ovs-openflowd. I have installed the
following flow entries.
cookie=0x0, duration=292.116s, table_id=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
priority=24576,icmp actions=CONTROLLER:1500
cookie=0x0, duration=292.116s, table_id=0, n_packets=189,
n_bytes=36725, priority=24576,u
Hi Ben,
I move forward to the head of master and that seems to work. Seems
like some bugs is fixed in between. Should have thought of git pull
--rebase. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks.
Regards
KK
On 16 February 2011 16:07, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:01:57PM -0800, kk yap w
As a follow-up, I am getting warning like
Feb 16 16:03:38|6|dpif|WARN|system@dp0: failed to
put[create][modify][zero] (Invalid argument)
in_port(1),eth(src=f0:7b:cb:a1:3c:c6,dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0806),arp(sip=10.33.0.132,tip=10.33.0.1,op=1),
packets:0, bytes:0, used:never
Feb 16
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:01:57PM -0800, kk yap wrote:
> I am running OVS with ovs-openflowd (version 1.1.0pre2). openflowd
> seems to be killing itself for some reason which I cannot figure out.
> Attached is the verbose output of ovs-openflowd and the pcap of the
> OpenFlow traffic going on dur
Okay, that makes a bit more sense. My guess is that if you look in
ovs-vswitchd's logs, you'll see some messages about "normalization changed
ofp_match". Internally, we're clearing those other wildcard bits, since
they're meaningless for non-IP/ARP flows (such as your flow definition with
eth
Great. I also made a mistake about the field. It was dl_type, not
dl_src. It actually works fine for dl_src.
- Derek
On 02/16/2011 05:36 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
No problem. Most of us are subscribed to both. :-) We'll take a look at it
in the morning, California time. I don't expect it w
No problem. Most of us are subscribed to both. :-) We'll take a look at it
in the morning, California time. I don't expect it will be a difficult fix.
Thanks for reporting it.
--Justin
On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Derek Cormier wrote:
> Now that I think about it, this should have been po
Now that I think about it, this should have been posted to the dev
board. Sorry about that!
- Derek
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
