Okay, that makes a bit more sense. My guess is that if you look in ovs-vswitchd's logs, you'll see some messages about "normalization changed ofp_match". Internally, we're clearing those other wildcard bits, since they're meaningless for non-IP/ARP flows (such as your flow definition with ethertype of 5). I'll talk with Ben about how we want to handle this from an OpenFlow-compatiblity standpoint tomorrow.
--Justin On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Derek Cormier wrote: > Great. I also made a mistake about the field. It was dl_type, not dl_src. It > actually works fine for dl_src. > > - Derek > > On 02/16/2011 05:36 PM, Justin Pettit wrote: >> No problem. Most of us are subscribed to both. :-) We'll take a look at >> it in the morning, California time. I don't expect it will be a difficult >> fix. >> >> Thanks for reporting it. >> >> --Justin >> >> >> On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Derek Cormier wrote: >> >>> Now that I think about it, this should have been posted to the dev board. >>> Sorry about that! >>> >>> - Derek >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> discuss mailing list >>> discuss@openvswitch.org >>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
