Re: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, according to ACM

2012-02-29 Thread Allan West
On 2/28/12 8:23 PM, Ski Kacoroski wrote: >> From: "Tom Perrine" >> To: "Lopsa Discussion" >> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:48:39 PM >> Subject: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, >> according to ACM >

Re: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, according to ACM

2012-02-28 Thread Ski Kacoroski
- Original Message - > From: "Tom Perrine" > To: "Lopsa Discussion" > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:48:39 PM > Subject: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, > according to ACM > > I saw this come across

Re: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, according to ACM

2012-02-28 Thread Gerben Dierick
On 28/02/12 17:45, Matthew Barr wrote: > I'm wondering how we get representatives on the next committee for IT, > though.. it's from 2007, and that's 5 years ago. They're probably > starting to think about revising.. I don't know about getting on the committee, but community feedback is welcome

Re: [lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, according to ACM

2012-02-28 Thread Matthew Barr
What's interesting is that the IT curriculum could be updated or adjusted for an SA curriculum. The IS one isn't too bad either. Some of the IS classes could be used in a SA curriculum, to fill out the some of the non-technical needs. I'm wondering how we get representatives on the next committe

[lopsa-discuss] at least five computer-related education paths, according to ACM

2012-02-28 Thread Tom Perrine
I saw this come across another mailing list and thought I should share: https://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendations ACM recognizes five distinct computer-relation degree paths, which I guess could correlate to different flavors of SW dev and IT. I think that my career path started as