What's interesting is that the IT curriculum could be updated or adjusted for an SA curriculum. The IS one isn't too bad either. Some of the IS classes could be used in a SA curriculum, to fill out the some of the non-technical needs.
I'm wondering how we get representatives on the next committee for IT, though.. it's from 2007, and that's 5 years ago. They're probably starting to think about revising.. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tom Perrine <t...@lopsa.org> wrote: > I saw this come across another mailing list and thought I should share: > > https://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendations > > ACM recognizes five distinct computer-relation degree paths, which I > guess could correlate to different flavors of SW dev and IT. > > I think that my career path started as Computer Engineering (I have an > Engineering degree in Computer Systems Engineering), but through the > years I've morphed through OS development to operations, to research, > back to operations and now architecture definition. > > What was your career path, and does the ACM taxonomy match or relate > to your experience? > > Discuss... :-) > > --tep > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.lopsa.org > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
