> Remember when Google first came out? It was so *simple* and elegant. Who
> could resist? Anyone else have a suggestion?
http://goosh.org/
+ nothing but results
+ it's a shell: your hands needn't leave the keyboard
--
Charles Polisher
___
Discuss
Lynda wrote:
>Google wants to hang crap off to the side that I don't want,
Eh? What crap? I have nothing on the right side of the results.
On the left side I have what amount to three unintrusive sections:
1. Quick links to to the other major Google tools:
* Everything
* Images
On 5/25/2011 4:41 PM, Meenoo Shivdasani wrote:
>> Remember when Google first came out? It was so *simple* and elegant. Who
>> could resist? Anyone else have a suggestion? I retyped this a few times
> Firefox with the Optimize Google extension configured to block ads?
I think you (and some others)
On 2011-05-25 at 16:30 -0700, Lynda wrote:
> Google wants to hang crap off to the side that I don't want, and that
> instant thing is now stuck in the ON position. Yahoo is so crowded with
> ads that it's vomitous, and has also decided that it wants to guess what
> I'm going to type, and to "hel
> From: discuss-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-
> boun...@lists.lopsa.org] On Behalf Of Lynda
>
> Remember when Google first came out? It was so *simple* and elegant.
> Who
> could resist? Anyone else have a suggestion? I retyped this a few times
> to remove the profanity, and it's diffic
Android user here. No live search where results alter as you type. But you
do get find as you type via suggestions, including a mash of history. If
you're in Maps or using what Google somehow determines is a localized
search, that seems to invoke local hits. I love it.
On May 25, 2011 8:19 PM, wro
+1 on the ironic bandwagon.
further, i found the warning about using a non-valuable password as it will
be occasionally emailed to me in clear text also ironic, for a security
list.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:01 PM, John Broome wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 16:40, Jim Hickstein wrote:
> > On
I beleive that google doesn't do the instant search for mobile devices,
but they may do browser detection to decide when to send you the smaller
version.
David Lang
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Lynda wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:30:39 -0700
> From: Lynda
> To: Lopsa Discussion
> Subject: [lo
On 05/25/2011 01:30 PM, Lynda wrote:
> Google wants to hang crap off to the side that I don't want, and that
> instant thing is now stuck in the ON position. Yahoo is so crowded with
> ads that it's vomitous, and has also decided that it wants to guess what
> I'm going to type, and to "help" me wit
On May 25, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Lynda wrote:
> Heck, I'd just be happy to have the old search engine sans nanny-isms back.
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
Alternately, the pieces you don't liked can be removed using a CSS override in
your browser or a plugin like Greasemonkey.
Grante
> Remember when Google first came out? It was so *simple* and elegant. Who
> could resist? Anyone else have a suggestion? I retyped this a few times
Firefox with the Optimize Google extension configured to block ads?
M
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@l
Google wants to hang crap off to the side that I don't want, and that
instant thing is now stuck in the ON position. Yahoo is so crowded with
ads that it's vomitous, and has also decided that it wants to guess what
I'm going to type, and to "help" me with it. Bing? It has all the
bloatware of Y
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 16:40, Jim Hickstein wrote:
> On 2011/05/25 15:37, Susan Baur wrote:
>> Am I the only one who finds it ironic
>
> No.
>
> > that I need to manually accept an "untrusted" certificate to sign up for
> the
> security discussion mailing list? (The domain is lists.lopsa.org an
On 2011/05/25 15:37, Susan Baur wrote:
> Am I the only one who finds it ironic
No.
> that I need to manually accept an "untrusted" certificate to sign up for the
security discussion mailing list? (The domain is lists.lopsa.org and the cert
is
only valid on lopsa.org.)
>
> --Susan
>
> On May 2
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that I need to manually accept an
"untrusted" certificate to sign up for the security discussion mailing list?
(The domain is lists.lopsa.org and the cert is only valid on lopsa.org.)
--Susan
On May 23, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Matt Disney wrote:
> Greetings,
>
I always thought my old infosec colleagues from
http://security.utexas.edu/did a good job in establishing platform
guidelines for the computing zoo
they dealt with.
http://security.utexas.edu/admin/ ; checklists for rhel and sol10
I think they're a filtered corpus from NSA guidelines and OWASP/SA
On 5/25/2011 11:20 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Jim Hickstein wrote:
>> I am being asked to provide content for a "UNIX/Linux Security Architecture
>> Standard". Google is unavailing. Does anyone have a (link to a) document of
>> this kind, that we could mine/steal
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Jim Hickstein wrote:
> I am being asked to provide content for a "UNIX/Linux Security Architecture
> Standard". Google is unavailing. Does anyone have a (link to a) document of
> this kind, that we could mine/steal? Or do I need to hire a security
> consultant
I am being asked to provide content for a "UNIX/Linux Security Architecture
Standard". Google is unavailing. Does anyone have a (link to a) document of
this kind, that we could mine/steal? Or do I need to hire a security
consultant
for that?
___
Di
19 matches
Mail list logo
