On 2011-09-10 7:31 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
At this point, this add-on would seem to eliminate the need of trimming,
too.
No, no, NO... trimming should still be required.
All QuoteCollapse does is spare me a lot of pain when I encounter morons
who refuse to trim posts...
--
Unsubscribe inst
On 2011-09-11 9:47 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Even if they did push it through, if no one enforces the eventual rule,
the time will be wasted. I'd prefer interspersion, as I almost always
have to scroll around somewhere in order to remember what was being
replied to.
Most people who advocate for
On 2011-09-12 8:42 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:06:49PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-09-11 9:47 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Even if they did push it through, if no one enforces the eventual rule,
the time will be wasted. I'd prefer interspersion, as I almost a
On 2011-10-02 2:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
On 10/2/11 at 09:07, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I have published a comprehensive Mailing List Netiquette, which should
satisfy your needs.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
Of course, a mailing list netiquette is just a reference document
On 2011-10-04 5:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
what is with this stupid quoting/replying method???
Oh... Outlook user...
Never mind...
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe
On 2011-10-20 4:52 AM, Mélodie wrote:
I've used Quote Colors for quite some time, at each update of TB I get
error messages, then mysteriously all starts to work again within a
couple of days without any intervention from my part, and without an
update to QC (is working at the moment).
It is c
On 2011-11-04 4:48 AM, sjonnie wrote:
i think it is only fair to warn people with a 64 bit OS that we do not
function well on a 64 bit OS.
2 friends have asked for help since they bought a new laptop with a 64 bit
OS.
now they are pissed off because they were not told about this problem.
Wha
On 2011-11-04 9:29 AM, sjonnie wrote:
OS is windows 7 ultimate sp1 with internet explo. completely locked up and
using firefox 7.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39659 more talk about java
1.7.0
The solution is simple - DON'T USE JRE7.
This is a well known issue.
I NEVER upgra
On 2011-12-13 3:11 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 13/12/2011 14:43, Harold Fuchs wrote:
Can LO read/import these formats for *editing*? All of them? If not, which?
Yes, all of them.
Can LO write/export these formats? All of them? If not, which?
Yes, all of them, although - given the immense
On 2011-12-14 6:41 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
So, my point is the following:
- I have people strongly asking for disabling reply-to mangling, e.g. on
the website list.
- I have people strongly asking for leaving reply-to mangling as is.
- So, whatever I do, someone will be upset.
- I mys
On 2011-12-19 6:31 AM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-15 23:56:
As well the proposal of Charles (Tanstaafl) of having a choice
while subscribing is worth considering. Maybe there is a possibility to
have a further subscribing mode with mlmmj. If possible, this
On 2011-12-19 1:26 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
I think migrating to Mailman 3 will take a while, since it requires
lots of efforts to switch our mail system, I guess.
I would wager that if whoever would be tasked with doing this was to ask
nicely on the mailman-dev list, you would get lots
I vote for removing them from ALL lists...
On 2012-08-01 6:28 PM, Florian Ehrenberg
wrote:
Hello,
today, a discussion started on the certification mailing list whether we
want to get rid of those mailing list prefixes in the subject, like
[libreoffice-announce], [libreoffice-conference] or [t
On 2012-08-12 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
I know we had numerous discussions on this topic in the past, but the
outcome was that roughly 50% were for this change, and 50% refused it,
so I am really sitting between two chairs here, for which I beg for your
understanding. On the one hand,
Please don't.
This is just stupid, and would be a total waste of developer resources.
There are plenty of browsers to choose from.
On 2012-11-08 4:04 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
Dear all,
after some talks with some board members, the request rised to include more
members and developers in the idea
I think the most important distinction to an end user, aside from
knowing that both allow them to *use* the software in any way they see
fit - personal, commercial, etc, is that the LO project is able to
benefit from AOO code, but AOO is not allowed to benefit from the LO code.
On 2013-01-01
On 2013-02-18 2:00 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I just found out that LibreOffice does not use the font color that the
FF Persona designs call for. So if the menu color is white in Firefox,
LO will still use the black menu color. That really messes up people
who want a dark color backgroun
On 2013-09-23 11:20 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
BTW, thank you, Pedro, for noticing that this list has been unhelpful
in the past. If questions like these should go somewhere else,
guidance is welcome.
This list is NOT intended for general Libreoffice support, it is
intended for discussion of
On 3/11/2016 12:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>>> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
>>> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3)
>>>
>>> You need to fix this bug. Can't
Why is this thread in the tdf-discuss list?
On 3/11/2016 3:28 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> Proof??? JRE works with 5.0 and doesn't work with 5.1. That is pretty
> objective proof.
> LibreOffice code changed and now does not find JRE on OS X.
>
> In case you weren't paying attention when 5.1.0 ca
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice
> on Macs with your code change.
*I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you.
> It worked before.
Past performance is no guarantee o
On 3/11/2016 6:22 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-03-11, 4:11 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>>> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice
>>> on Macs with your code change.
>> *I* broke it? Sor
On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> My "Fix it" comment was aimed at LibreOffice in general, not to you
> specifically.
Oh, so you prefer to issue 'general purpose' commands and edicts rather
than ones aimed at spoecific people. How very thoughtful.
> You are one of the people who under
On 2011-06-08 12:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:17 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
>> Jim, thank you for your considered - and considerate ! - reply.
>> The circumstances being what they are, would not the best path for
>> ASF to take(as seems to me to be the case) be to accept the gran
On 2011-06-08 2:04 PM, BRM wrote:
> Like all the venom towards Oracle, OOo, and ASF that has been spewed
> by TDF members and contributors on this topic over the last few days?
Very little of the negative reaction has been directed at the ASF,
mostly it is directed at Oracle...
Personally, I thi
On 2011-06-18 5:39 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> And there is no better way to do this than have the 'git repositories'
> of the LibreOffice source code.
You were correct earlier - he is merely pointing out that nowhere in the
license agreement (I haven't read it so am not making the same claim)
d
On 2011-07-19 8:10 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> 2. The versions of the C++ libraries we are distributing are the last
> ones available from Microsoft as a full package. According to the
> security bulletin:
That isn't the point...
NO software should EVER force the installation of older libraries wh
On 2011-07-19 9:47 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> We can detect if there a new version installed, and then do nothing,
> but the trade-off will be to make LibreOffice less reliable.
Or, you could code LibO to force a 'repair install' of the *existing*
version so that it does work fine, and only instal
On 2011-07-28 4:40 PM, Jomar Silva wrote:
> In summary: It's good to users that we support MSO files, but the real
> world side effect of that is that people will keep using MSO files...
> it's up to us to find a way to change the Status Quo in a smooth way
It'll never happen...
For better or wo
On 2011-07-28 4:54 PM, Olivier Hallot
wrote:
> What you say is almost that we should give up on ODF and stick with
> Microsoft formats...
Not at all...
> I would prefer that LO import MSO format flawlessly but not export them at
> all...
My same response - that eliminates LibO as an option for
30 matches
Mail list logo
