I'm not a developer, nor do I pretend to understand the nuances of memory management. But
I signed up for this list just to say "thanks" to all the devs and others that
are finally discussing what I consider to be one of the biggest problems with Linux on
the desktop.
My experience with deskto
(Oops, sorry, re-post because I messed up the threading.)
I'm not a developer, nor do I pretend to understand the nuances of memory management. But
I signed up for this list just to say "thanks" to all the devs and others that
are finally discussing what I consider to be one of the biggest prob
Hi all,
I am working o a project that sets up packages on the cloud.
I need to find a package manager that can be customized, like feature to
install dependancy on a remote machine(cloud instance).
like if i want to install Package1 which needs pkg1-dep1, pkg1-dep2,
pkg1-dep2-dep1, pkg1-dep2-dep3
On 17 February 2011 01:02, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> I was just trying to build the latest Asterisk, which uses
> jack-audio-connection-kit, but it looks like the most recent build of
> celt from this afternoon broke the build:
>
> DEBUG util.py:247: libcelt0.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> jack-audio-c
On 20 February 2011 00:40, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Michael S wrote:
>> On 17 February 2011 01:02, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>> I was just trying to build the latest Asterisk, which uses
>>> jack-audio-connection-kit, but it looks like the mo
The coding in binary code, in other words, machine code is necessary currently?
The coding in assembly is necessary currently?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
2014-09-10 17:53 GMT-03:00, Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 10.09.2014 um 22:46 schrieb françai s:
>> The coding in binary code, in other words, machine code is necessary
>> currently?
>> The coding in assembly is necessary currently?
>
> define "necessary"
>
I thought that never hear someone say that currently uses binary code.
One person told me that there are three or more years ago the
University of Latvia and Riga Technical University taught code in
binary.
I like both this subject that is irresistible to me.
I say this because about three years
OpenZFS is frequently lagging behind in support for newer kernels which would
work against Fedora's "rolling" approach to kernel releases.
Proxmox and Ubuntu don't feature rolling kernel releases. That's why they can
ship OpenZFS (without legal problems, btw).
___
The legality FUD is unrelated to rolling or non-rolling kernels.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj
It's not a GPL violation. OpenZFS works under Linux through a compatibility
layer called SPL, the Solaris Porting Layer. SPL is licensed under GPL.
Torvalds himself said that a non-GPL file system that was written for another
OS cannot be considered a derivative of the Linux kernel:
https://yar
Why not Stratis?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fe
I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just choose the
modules that you want on the website and download a custom live iso with
those packages! But that feature is disabled now, perhaps
because they use a new module system now.
Ah, here: http://old.slax.org/build.php
I'm not s
update: definitely works.
It's pretty neat to have a live usb with the exact programs that you like
ready in your pocket!
How can you create an iso on the fly that fast?!
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mahrud S wrote:
> I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could jus
On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
`MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
[:snip:]
Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know PETSc is quite challenging to
package.
I tried to
On 4/7/20 12:51 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote:
On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
`MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
on Rawhide
> Hi,
>
> A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group
> @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1]
> Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened it and moved
> against F32.
>
> How can I get someone appropriate to notice it?
> The generic
Try assigning it to the right c
fedora for RISC-V with out compressed instructions.
Please share the link if it is already ported, or give the guidelines on how to
port.
Regards,
Sreenadh S.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37
Got the following errors
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module
php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires
php(api
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk <
puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 03/15/2018 01:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
> >
> > It's not. Now it's enp0s3.
> >
> > And renaming /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ens3 to ifcfg-enp0s3
> > doesn't do anything.
>
> Note that
Hi,
I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on
Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7.
Fedora/RHEL-8 uses:
# cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk
7 4 1 7
while RHEL-7 uses:
# cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk
2 4 1 7
I also see that this seem
On 16/10/2020 01:09, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:24 PM David S. wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on
>> Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7.
>>
>> Fedora/RHEL-8 uses:
>
On 16/10/2020 18:57, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On Fr, 2020-10-16 at 15:27 +0200, David S. wrote:
>> My testing is currently on a standard Fedora 32 x86_64 running in
>> Digital Ocean (from their Fedora image pool). It should be fairly
>> up-to-date (I see now there is a 5.8.15
Wholeheartedly agree. Everybody who disagrees with your proposal better put
their money where their mouth is and do all necessary QA work for the upcoming
release!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
> I won't have a source for what I said right now, but likely searching for
> Secure Boot + TPM2 issues when dual booting will help
> Hope that helps,
> Mateus Rodrigues Costa
Is it that what you mentioned ? :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
--
http://informatics.umdnj.edu/BioRPMs/
> [2] http://biolinux.org (down atm)
> [3] http://www.bioinformatics.org/r-repo/wiki/
- Allen S. Rout
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Hi!
Would anybody like to make a review (sponsor needed) on darktable?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866
Dmitrij.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640889
(sponsor needed). I also teke part in discussion on darktable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi!
I would like to go throught review prosses for two packages: q4wine and
k4dirstat.
q4wine.It is a qt4 GUI for wine. It could help one to manage wine prefixes and
installed applications.General features:* Can export QT color theme into wine
colors settings.* Can easy work with different wine
Hi!
%{_libdir}/girepositry-1.0/ is not owned by any package. It is used, i.e., in
DeviceKit-power-devel.
Dmitrij.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re-review needed after package name change and added Obsoletes:
Will swap a review.
bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050
Spec URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/hekafs.spec
SRPM URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/hekafs-0.7-7.fc15.src.rpm
Thanks,
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
Already approved once. Just need a quick re-review of the rename and the
added Obsoletes:
Original Message
Subject: package re-review needed — CloudFS name change to HekaFS
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:40:20 -0400
From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re
glusterfs is a clustering file system consisting of a management
daemon and one or more instances of servers for each 'brick' in the
cluster. hekafs is an add-on for glusterfs that adds cloud attributes
such as multi-tenancy, encryption, and authentication.
I suppose the first question is do w
On 08/17/2011 05:51 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
> slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
> packages in F16 require rebuilding. The sooner the better to stop
> spreading the damage but
On 08/23/2011 08:40 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Aug 23 08:15:54 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> ...
> cloudfs-0.7-6.fc17.x86_64 requires glusterfs = 0:3.2.1
> ...
How do I get cloudfs out of rawhide/f1
I've got an F16alpha kvm guest installed from scratch a few days ago.
Today I tried a `yum update` (with --disablerepo=updates-testing) which
failed. By trial and error I determined that it is btrfs-progs, trying
to update from 0.19-13.fc15 to 0.19-16.fc15, that fails with:
warning: rpmts_Hd
On 10/04/2011 09:36 AM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 04:01, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> The XP I occasionally can not avoid to use, in its system control menus
>>> has controls to switch between "normal", "big" "very big" f
fs-3.2.4-3.x86_64.fc16.rpm and
glusterfs-3.2.4-4.x86_64.fc17.rpm.
I.e:
f16 rawhide
current 3.2.4-1.fc16 [i] 3.2.4-1.fc17 [i]
new... 3.2.4-2.fc17 [s]
3.2.4-3.fc16 [i] 3.2.4-4.fc17 [s]
([i] means init.d, [s] means systemd)
Al
I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant
part of my spec file is:
...
%files server
...
%if 0%{?fedora} < 17
# Legacy init
%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterd
%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterfsd
%else
%{_unitdir}/glusterd.service
%{_unitdir}/glusterfsd.service
%endif
...
and
HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server.
In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init
script has:
...
vercmd="from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print
get_python_lib()"
py_dir=$(python -c "${vercmd}")
exe="${py_dir}/hekafsd.py"
Tell us again where to find that "gnome shell for dummies" doc?
I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so
non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I gave up after an hour and
switched to Forced Fallback Mode.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
181 Apr 12 15:06 yadda
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root138 Apr 12 15:04 yadda~
[root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz
Your source does not exist, please use the full path (plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz)
[root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s ./plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz
Your source does not exist, please use the full path
executing the loop in parallel.
Depends: R (>= 2.5.0), iterators(>= 1.0.0), codetools, utils
License: Apache License (== 2.0)
Packaged: 2009-10-05 20:33:54 UTC; weston
Repository: CRAN
Date/Publication: 2009-10-06 06:56:45
- Allen S. Rout
___
r-d
preferences on this, especially with
respect to how my previous work didn't fit your picture? If you did,
then if I get around to it I could work in ways aligned with your plans.
- Allen S. Rout
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraprojec
27;m not trying to say "I'm right", but instead the much weaker
"This is how it looks to me".
- Allen S. Rout
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was
enabled and run.
I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though
openssh-server was installed, it was both not enabled and therefor not
run when the install finished and after a reboot.
It's possible that I
On 11/09/2011 11:15 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 04:07 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was
>> enabled and run.
>>
>> I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday
I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 ...`
respectively.
I can also build using mock, both x86_64 and i386, with `mock -r
epel-6-x86_64 --rebuild ...` and mock -r epel-6-i386 --rebuild ...`
respe
On 11/23/2011 10:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 07:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>
>> I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
>> and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 ...`
>> respectively.
>&g
> Removing: bwidget
> amsn requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17
> mcu8051ide requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17
> setools-gui requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17
> tkabber requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17
tcl/tk stack is dropped, ok. As tkabber maintainer, should I release ownership?
--
devel
From the other hand, I'l take:
blt
bwidget
itcl
itk
tcl-tclxml
tcllib
tdom
tklib
For Fedora, not for EPEL.
(sorry, email server have some problems for now, so I had to create new
messages but bot reply)
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
tdom is picked up by me for Fedora (not EPEL).
For EPEL tdom is orphant but not in drop list *still*.
> Can I pick up tdom?
>
>
> Takanori
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi!
Could anybody look into https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5101 ?
Dmitrij.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to 3.2.6?
In f17alpha we also have 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update that at this
point
Hi!
I want to suggest review swap. Here are mine:
kaudiocreator[1] - Program for ripping and encoding Audio-CDs
k4dirstat[2] - Graphical Directory Statistics for Used Disk Space
Both are rather simple.
Dmitrij.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649425
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.
OK, thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>
>>> [In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
>>>
>>> 'dnf install --inst
On 09/16/2015 01:19 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "AT" == Alexander Todorov writes:
>
> AT> offending packages. You can find links to the script and execution
> AT> log here:
> AT> http://atodorov.org/blog/2015/09/16/4000-bugs-in-fedora-checksec-failures/
>
> BTW to see if any packages
Hello all,
My name is Ryan Brown. I'm a long-time user of Fedora and have recently
begun contributing to Openstack Heat. Heat is [1] a system for
describing and reproducing infrastructure in Openstack, roughly
equivalent to AWS CloudFormation.
I'm not yet in the packagers group, but I will b
According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent
too.
Moreover, his last build on koji was in late 2012.
As for both above mentioned, I want to take ownership on CVector a
Ahhh... Japan. I haven't twitter, but it could be fixed in no time.
Thanks anyway. I'l try.
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
> >
> > Takanori M
Have no reply still.
Contact information on his page still provide the same email I mentioned befor.
So, request still active.
> Ahhh... Japan. I haven't twitter, but it could be fixed in no time.
> Thanks anyway. I'l try.
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Th
Thanks a lot for your help.
> Hi Dmitrij,
> (CC'd Takanori)
>
> I know him personally. I got in touch with him and got his response.
>
> He said he had no time to maintain all of his packages now. So he will
> orphan them and he would like you to take owernership
>
> I know I can't speak for hi
No actions still.
> According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
>
> Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent
> too.
> Moreover, his last build on koji was in late 2012.
>
> As for both above mentioned,
Still no actions.
According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent
too.
Moreover, his last build on koji was in late 2012.
As for both above mentioned, I want to take o
Takanori Matsuura (fas: tmatssu) cant be reached for a long time. There are no
reply on email,
in bugreport [1], there are no koji builds [2], even more, from the previous
message, Jiro Matsuzawa
tell he contact him personaly (a week ago) nut there were no actions.
At all mentioned above, I re
Hi!
Samba4 in Fedora can't be a AD DC still. You should rebuild srpm with
proper spec changes or build it from sources.
krege.
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
As a FESCo member I am acking this part of the process.
I have orphaned:
CQRlib
CVector
NearTree
autoconf-archive
Thanks. Taken:
CQRlib
CVector
NearTree
Talking about autoconf-archive, may be move information about it's
orphaning in new separate thread?
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
--
Hello,
during implementation of the one of the "Unresponsive maintainer policy"
one package did not get it's maintainer:
autoconf-archive
According to [1] there are some "awaiting review" statuses, but package
still orphaned. If you need it, please, take care of it.
Dmitrij.
[1] https://a
Please, feel free to take it!
I don't want to dive into autohell more then I have to.
Dmitrij.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Talking about autoconf-archive, may be move information about it's orphaning
in new separate thread?
I've tracked th
Posting to -devel because I can't post to vdsm-owner or virt-maintenance.
On 09/15/2014 09:57 AM, Balamurugan Arumugam wrote:
[Adding Dan]
- Original Message -
From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"
To: "Lalatendu Mohanty" , build...@fedoraproject.org,
vdsm-ow...@fedora
Posting to -devel because I can't post to vdsm-owner or virt-maintenance.
On 09/15/2014 10:09 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
gluster server. AFAIK it's a mistake for vdsm to have these as
dependencies.
Correcting myself. glusterfs-cli is okay, and should, AFAIK, be in
RHEL6, althou
Just check this
First.
# dnf update
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Second.
# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
Transaction Summary
=
Upgrade 2 Packages
Total download size: 15 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Just check this
First.
# dnf update
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Second.
# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
Transaction Summary
On 10/16/2014 09:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of
> any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the
> Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to
> FESCo for a more complete
I previously did a fedpkg build of nfs-ganesha-2.2.0-1 for f22 on
2015-04-21. [1]
I've added a %license, bumped the Release, and added a changelog.
fedpkg builds for rawhide are okay, as are the x86_64 builds for f22,
but i686 builds are failing,
Apparently with (from [2] root.log and simi
On 06/01/2015 10:37 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:03:27AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> People use Fedora on portable/mobile devices which are connected to
>>> diverse networks as and when required. The automatic DNS
>>> configura
On 06/01/2015 01:55 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "RSB" == Ryan S Brown writes:
>
> RSB> I disagree; for server & cloud deployments it doesn't make sense to
> RSB> duplicate a DNS server on *every* host, and if you care about
>
GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change.
Much of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small
number of pieces still remain under GPLv3+.
What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?
--
Kaleb
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
What hoops do I have to jump through, approvals, etc., do I need to
respin glusterfs rpms as glusterfs32 (for 3.2.6, and soon 3.2.7), and
the imminent glusterfs-3.3.0, which would be glusterfs33.
I.e. what is currently glusterfs-3.2.6-2.{fc16,fc17,el6} would become
glusterfs32-3.2.6-x.{fc16,
On 05/30/2012 12:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
To be honest it's a pain in the neck to deal with such packages, and
unless there's an overwhelming need, I can't recommend it. Does any
user really need to parallel install both versions of glusterfs?
No, and in fact that would not work. (And
On 05/30/2012 01:08 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 05/30/2012 12:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
To be honest it's a pain in the neck to deal with such packages, and
unless there's an overwhelming need, I can't recommend it. Does any
user really need to parallel install b
On 05/30/2012 01:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
And FWIW, doing nothing doesn't resolve the glusterfs in EPEL versus
glusterfs in the RHS Channel issue.
That's a different story entirely, and why would you want gluster in
EPEL when it's already in RHEL? What's the difference?
This has been
On 05/30/2012 01:34 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 05/30/2012 01:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
And FWIW, doing nothing doesn't resolve the glusterfs in EPEL versus
glusterfs in the RHS Channel issue.
That's a different story entirely, and why would you want gluster in
EPEL
On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best
strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile
for those that wish to play. For gluster 3.3 I suggest a feature page
for F-18 / rawhide. Is it feasible for the
On 05/31/2012 02:00 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Kaleb Keithley wrote:
About a week ago I did a scratch build of one of my packages that
includes and it built successfully.
Today I did another scratch build and it broke with:
...
Making all in src
CC fuse-helpers.lo
CC fuse-resolve.l
Hi!
I submitted update for tcllib 1.11 -> 1.15. If your software use it please
test for compatibility and in case of problem feel free to decrease the karma.
Dmitrij.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduc
Thanks. Fixed.
> 1.15-2.fc21 didn't fix the file conflict problem.
>
> file /usr/share/man/mann/fifo.n.gz from install of tcllib-1.15-2.fc21.noarch
> conflicts with file from package memchan-2.3-4.fc20.i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
with the same name exists in /usr/bin
My memory is that the "s" wa
On 05/05/2014 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
/usr/sbin is an invention of Linux.
Strange that you would claim this.
Here's a list of what's in /usr/sbin on NetBSD 1.0 (and there's no
overlap between what's in /usr/sbin and any other subdir.)
drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 1994-10-19
failed. I did an admin request in PkgDB for
NearTree[1], what could I do else?
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/NearTree/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: ht
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > > Package(co)maintainers
> > >
> > >
> > > ===
> > > NearTre
Hi!
Package NearTree is going to be dropped as it is not built for F21. Its
maintainer, tmatsuu, was seen on koji in late 2012, September.
I would like to take NearTree as it is reqiured for my rasmol package. I made
a request in PkgDB, but who should I notice to grant the rights?
Dmitrij.
--
Hi!
FAS user tmatsuu is innactive for almost two years [1], he did not answered on
email. Does anyone know how to contact him?
Dmitrij
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1247
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On 10/15/2015 03:30 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:54:29AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
same python version as the Ansible version you're using. If Ansible were to
use python3, all module bindings would need to be python 3, and *all the
managed machines would need t
Hi!
I have an issue with building a package under arm arch [1]. i686 and
x86_64 builds completed with no errors but not arm. It is running (or
staled) already more then for 10 hours.
The question: could I somehow investigate what going on there? And how
(if yes)? I have no arm machine to run
On 25/11/15 04:25, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
I experienced the same thing yesterday. Looks like the stall happens
after the build phase (which only took half an hour). It actually
completed after 14 hours after that.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11962048
18 hours
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 10:17, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
On 25/11/15 04:25, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
I experienced the same thing yesterday. Looks like the stall happens
after the build phase (which only took half an hour). It actually
completed after 14 hours after that.
https
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:25:39 +0600
"Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich" wrote:
Hi!
I have an issue with building a package under arm arch [1]. i686 and
x86_64 builds completed with no errors but not arm. It is running (or
staled) already more then for 10 hours.
The question: could I somehow i
hrough unretire process anyway but I think it is something
that is completely wrong.
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
