What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?
-- Kaleb -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change.
Much of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small
number of pieces still remain under GPLv3+.
- license in rpm spec file for dual license? Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
