Hello,
According to schedule, there is now a feature freeze in effect. I read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy but
it's not clear for me if I'm too late to ask a minor version update.
Syslog-ng 3.1.2 was released yesterday (for details, check
https://lists.bala
Hello,
On 08/06/2010 01:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Czanik wrote:
>> While I guess, it's too late now to make a switch now, here is some good
>> news:
>> http://bazsi.blogs.balabit.com/2010/07/syslog-ng-contributions-
> redefined.html
>> Dual licensing wi
me know, if you need any additional help/information to get
syslog-ng updated for Fedora.
Best regards,
Peter Czanik
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> dist
Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could upd
in creating the v3.2 package for openSUSE and FreeBSD and I could
share my experiences, patches, etc. there.
Bye,
--
Peter Czanik (CzP)
BalaBit IT Security / syslog-ng upstream
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> dist
Hello,
2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
>> at all. Here on the lis
Hello,
2010-06-02 12:56 keltezéssel, Peter Czanik írta:
>
> So the question is modified: how can I get it (and the supporting
> packages) back into Fedora. I have now updated the syslog-ng spec file
> from Fedora 12 to syslog-ng version 3.1.1 and compiled with mock on FC12
> F
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request?
>> Is there maintainer a timeout,
Hello,
2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> On 06/11/2010 05:32 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> 2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
>>
>>> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
Hello,
2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> To be honest, maintaining syslog-ng (while I use it all the time) is a
> very
> tiring process; there isn't much "support" for multiple sysloggers in Fedora
> and it was a real pain to get everyone cooperating to make them not have to
> conf
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
>> of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
>> about maintainership.
>>
> +1
>
> IMHO any sponsored packager sho
Hello,
2010-07-02 14:48 keltezéssel, Thomas Janssen írta:
> +1
>> I'd like to get syslog-ng updated to the latest version in Rawhide (I
>> work part time for the upstream developer and I'm also an occasional
>> Fedora user). I contacted the package owner, no response. Created a
>> bugreport to get
Hello,
2010-07-21 06:18 keltezéssel, John Poelstra írta:
> Feature Freeze means that all accepted feature for the release are
> *significantly* "feature complete", ready for testing, and have a
> current status.
>
What does it from the software version point of view? I'm asking because
of the
17 matches
Mail list logo