Thankyou for starting all this hard work with the certainty that it *will*
be blamed by some people.
As an end User I extremely like that Fedora does not ban newer packages from
Stable releases.
At the same time I can see how direct pushes can sometimes create unforseen
bugs.
I however do not se
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski
>
> Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome?
> (I'm just asking because I'm curious, not because I use Linux on
> desktop)
I think for many people the issue is not that it can be an update (maybe the
enhancements etc are useful to someone).
There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting (I
upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
I would assume its the same error?
On 31 January 2011 07:22, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that Ne
Probably posting it to the wrong place, but does this court ruling set the
precedent to allowing the libdvdcss library to be part of Fedora?
"Merely bypassing a technological protection that restricts a user from
> viewing or using a work is insufficient to trigger the (Digital Millennium
> Copyr
Longer term, would turning this "stateless" via new systemd features
be helpful?.
On 31 July 2014 18:13, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:04:16AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> Some ideas:
>> 1. First and foremost, we should obviously consider whether we can make some
>> compose
When creating an account, I am pretty sure there is a toggle box of
whether the account is for an administrator or not.
I suspect toggling that has the effect that some on this thread desire.
For a normal single user system, I am glad that such a toggle exists
and gives me some power that is much
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 02:57 clime, wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 01:59, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:51 PM clime wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
would fixing this also fix the bug where installing a new kernel changes
the default boot OS even when the default is non Linux?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
While dnf itself might want to stay "pure" and do as commanded, maybe
for fedora there should be a default plugin that adds some protection
for the regular users?
On 21 June 2014 18:02, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Tim Lauridsen
> wrote:
>>
>> many people stops readi
People have moved past vorbis and into the world of Opus. Even MP3 is more
for the vast amounts of legacy content - most current content will be AACL.
Saying that, as a no-lawyer, it did seem last time that I looked that many
remaining patents after September 2015 were for encoding processes, but
On 30 January 2013 04:24, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Second, if mariadb differs more in the future and stops to be "drop-in"
> replacement, then we'll need an alternative for applications, where mariadb
> won't be suitable enough. Nevertheless, this is not a current issue right
> now.
> >
>
> Indee
Trying to turn this discussion into something more productive and
deliberately ignoring the negativity:
What is the present position/plan for f2fs in Fedora?
Is there any hardware out there that uses it?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On 26 January 2015 at 22:52, Will Woods wrote:
>
> (As an aside, PackageKit should also support these operations, so we can
> use PackageKit to make a Upgrade GUI Thing.)
>
Gnome Software has had some interesting work done in the 3.16 cycle to
handle upgrades.
For atleast the workstation produc
I have received a few on the development mailing list.
On 17 Jul 2017 6:48 pm, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
>> folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list?
>>
>
From my understanding, they can be used in any context.
It would probably be interesting if cisco can be convinced to make a
gstreamer plugin that is than automatically downloaded - that will
have a wide benefit.
(they have stated that they are willing to support as many platforms
as possible. Ma
A solution may be for someone to write a plugin that restores the
protected packages feature.
Fedora users are clearly used to such a feature and expect it while
upstream doesnt want to add hand holding features, but provide a
method to do the same.
On 5 January 2014 18:32, Lars E. Pettersson wr
The change record for this states that we are not following the BLS at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ but the
proposed update at
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/MatthewGarrett/BootLoaderSpec/ .
It is not clear however if everyone has moved to the new spec or wheth
The major OS competitor has moved to a 6 month release cadence, so that
needs to be taken into account.
I suspect the easiest way to have a longer supported system is by NOT
having a longer supported system. For the case of desktop hardware vendors
something like a constantly updating silverblue m
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 08:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 23/12/2022 09:20, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > I know this is way harder, but the right approach would be having a way
> > to tell systemd what processes can be killed and what other processes
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023, 01:08 Randy Barlow via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 7/7/23 19:59, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > That is not consent. The GDPR explicitly states that consent must
> > be opt-IN.
>
> I agree.
>
> I think it is important to make it possible for a user to as
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, 21:23 Kevin Fenzi, wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Samantha Bueno writes:
> > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora
> > > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well.
> >
> > For those of us who upgrade
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023, 13:37 JT, wrote:
> That looks like it's just a proposal by some random people that KDE and
> GNOME should to work together. I've not seen a statement by either
> desktop. the file referenced is literally under a directory called
> "proposals". and I've never heard of this "Pl
Another option is to allow the x11-compatible packages but as a clearly
forked desktop with a clearly different name
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, 12:10 Steve Cossette, wrote:
> So, if you all don't mind, I'd like to steer this discussion in a slightly
> different way:
>
> What *is* the definition of a Fe
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024, 23:16 Sérgio Basto, wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
> > > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
> > > disappointed in yo
Has there been any consideration to turn on frame pointers for atleast dev
releases?
AFAIK the kernel already has a separate configuration during the
development phase of the distro-cycle
Can this be extended for rebuilds of alpha and beta releases in rawhide to
turn on frame pointers as an inter
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, 19:22 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 08/11/2022 19:53, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> > Has there been any consideration to turn on frame pointers for atleast
> > dev releases?
>
>
> Fedora has no dev releases. M
> > what is the impact of the proposed change on non-x86 platforms? I
> > assume the proposal focuses on x86, but the distro wide flags are shared
> > across all platforms in Fedora, it means aarch64, ppc64le and s390x.
> > With RISC-V waiting behind the door ...
>
> None, because this proposal is
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 10:40, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraPlasmaWorkstation
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 16:35 Kevin Kofler via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > By default, GNOME only presents the close window button. The other
> > buttons are missing, and there isn't really an intuitive way to
> > discover the other window management actions.
and the proprietary one could have a blacklist for very bad packages.
The ability remains to filter if there is a package that is considered bad
or malicous. The default is just changed to an allow list. Secondly if
there is a malicious package, it will probably be faster to contact flathub
and ha
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, 23:50 Christopher Klooz, wrote:
> It seems that Fedora does not support the Realtek RTL8811CU for WiFi. A
> user at ask.Fedora just had the issue. `lsusb` classifies it just as
> "Bus 001 Device 010: ID 0bda:c811 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 802.11ac
> NIC"; correspondingly, `
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, 03:37 Allan via devel,
wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 23:21:36 +0200
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 05. 07. 22 23:16, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on going for a number of
> > > years, but we've never officially supported it due to lack of
> >
With its move to gtk4, the nautilus extensions api has been changed:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/merge_requests/927 (plus another
merge request moving the extension location to the correct place).
Brasero (and others) require more than just bumping to higher API version
number.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 19:47, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 11/20/20 1:28 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > Ben Cotton wrote on Fri, Nov 20, 2020:
> l the pipewire-pulse library (which
> >> removes the pulseaudio package).
> >
> > Took me some time to figure out how to test:
>
> [Snip]
>
> Me too.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 16:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire
>
>
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> We would make a pipewire-pulse package that provides the same features
> as the pulseaudio (daemon) package.
> We would only provide a drop-in replac
Another option could be to ship Fedora 27 with a Firefox 57 prerelease
version. This will stop breakage of extensions 2 weeks after Fedora 27
ships (and shipped extensions can be moved to web extension version).
On 13 Oct 2017 12:31 pm, "Peter Oliver" <
lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk> wrote:
Looking at Nextcloud releases, it seems that they do a major release once a
year.
It should be possible to catch up with the upstream even if there is a
single update per Fedora release.
Update to Nextcloud 11 in Fedora 27, 12 in current Fedora 28 and then in
Fedora 29 cath up with upstream.
Adm
I didnt log the error messages but when rebasing Fedora Silverblue, there
was an issue that I encountered:
In Silverblue 34 I had at some point clicked "enable workstation
repositories" in Gnome Software and forgotten about it. This added a layer
with the relevant rpms.
As this rpm is now in the
11.7.1 is an RC release, not stable. It also is not an lts release so the
11.7 cycle will only be supported for around 3 months
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, 03:58 Ryan Bach via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Why is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb10.11 10.11 the latest
> versi
39 matches
Mail list logo
