On Fri Dec 2, 2022 at 13:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What does everyone else think? Has the time come? Or is there more we
> need to do to make side tags usable for all cases before getting rid of
> overrides?
-1. For many use cases, side tags are the correct solution and buildroot
override
On Thu Dec 8, 2022 at 17:29 +, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> > Do we need a mailing list? My initial gut feeling is no, but I'm
> > interested in what other people think.
>
> I think we don't. Tracking conversations and issues is much easier with a
> tracker than mailing lists.
I think it's helpfu
On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 22:04 +, Audrey Toskin wrote:
> DNF modules let you install multiple different versions of Python 3,
> and the `alternatives` tool lets you change which is the default
> version invoked by `/usr/bin/python3`.
This is not the case on any current Fedora release. AFAIK, only
On Fri Dec 16, 2022 at 20:31 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> I wish I could write that I am going to build duktape 2.7.0 which bumps the
> soname. However, my brain kind of misfired and I didn't, for some reason,
> announce this upfront. The changes are minor, ABI changing stuff, I've
> taken c
On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 14:10 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> If all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
I don't think this soname bump should happen in a stable release.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.
On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 15:56 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:54 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 19, 2022 at 14:10 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > > If all goes well, I will do the same for F37.
> >
> > I don't think this
Hi Fedorians,
A recent PR reminded me that I never properly announced the new (well,
four months old) bundled() Provides generator for Golang projects[1].
This can be used to simplify generating these Provides when bundling is
justified in Fedora[2] or for (EP)EL. Simply mark the vendor/modules.tx
On Sun Dec 25, 2022 at 09:02 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> rpm -E '%__global_ldflags'
>
> is also needed for LDFLAGS.
%__global_ldflags is deprecated. You should use %build_ldflags
instead[1]. Also, %build_cflags, %build_cxxflags, and friends are
preferred to %optflags AFAIK.
[1]:
https://src.
On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 15:00 +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Hello again, as stated before [1], I'm updating cfitsio to 4.2. I have
> created a side tag f38-build-side-61457
>
> I have already built cfitsio, CCfits and wcslib. Affected packages are:
>
> astrometry
> bes
> CCfits
> cpl
> elements-ale
On Thu Dec 29, 2022 at 09:40 HST, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 15:00 +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> > Hello again, as stated before [1], I'm updating cfitsio to 4.2. I have
> > created a side tag f38-build-side-61457
> >
> > I have already
On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 15:00 +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> > > Hello again, as stated before [1], I'm updating cfitsio to 4.2. I have
> > > created a side tag f3
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 09:57 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
> > inflates Release counters.
>
> I always wondered why people are afraid of gaps in numbering? It is
> just a number. T
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 12:32 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
> the package and increase relversion ?
`git commit --allow-empty -m "Changelog entry here"` will do what you
want. The empty commit will result in a release and changelo
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 11:46 -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
> I went ahead and took vim-nerdtree.
FYI: Nerdtree is unmaintained upstream:
https://github.com/preservim/nerdtree/issues/1280
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
___
devel
Jan 7, 2023 4:41:29 PM Lumír Balhar :
y-py upstream uses maturin as a build backend which is not available in
Fedora yet so I had to add some metadata manually to port it to
setuptools-rust
Why not package maturin? Is there something particularly problematic
about maturin (e.g. lots of missin
On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
> golang-github-gin-gonic eclipseo, go-sig
I've fixed this:
On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> golang-github-d2g-dhcp4servereclipseo, go-sig
I need a package review to fix this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160202
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
On Thu Jan 12, 2023 at 01:19 +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> El vie, 30 dic 2022 a las 2:33, Maxwell G via devel (<
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>) escribió:
>
> > On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > > On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> Can take this if no-one else is interested (@Sergio Basto?)
>
> > docker-compose lsm5, orphan, ttomecek 1 weeks
> > ago
The Python docker-compose is deprecated upstream in favor of the Compose
V2 Docker CLI Plugin written in Go. The latter is not yet packaged for
Fe
On Tue Jan 24, 2023 at 22:44 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to
> keep up with upstream releases, especially since the introduction of
> Rust components.
What (rust) dependencies are missing? Is it just python-orjson?
I worked on packagin
On Fri Feb 3, 2023 at 02:00 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 02. 23 17:06, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > # Create a blank ''blocker'' package that Conflicts with the to be
> > removed packages.
> > # Create a new Copr with the blocker package in its default buildroot.
> > This will simulate the actual r
On Fri Feb 3, 2023 at 01:42 +, Maxwell G wrote:
> (see the attachment)
Here it is!
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
diff --git a/blocker.patch b/blocker.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..76999f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blocker.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+From 90303acd82a190711f6b9
2023-02-07T11:43:53Z Lokesh Mandvekar :
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the upcom
Hi Fedorians,
I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd like
to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a friendly
interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it really easy to
query across Fedora and EPEL branches. It uses the dnf Python binding
On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 08:12 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 12/02/23 06:31, Maxwell G via devel ha scritto:
> > For reverse dependency rebuilds, you probably want the following
> > command:
> >
> > ```
> > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fe
On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 13:40 +, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > Though, it would be nice to have an easier subcommand or option just for
> > that, as it will be, I think, the most required use case. Maybe a 'fedrq
> > whatrequires --soname-bump SRCNAME'?
>
> Th
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 1:16:00 PM CDT Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> We have a new R version sitting on a side tag (f37-build-side-55653)
> for a few weeks now, where packages are being rebuilt as time permits.
Can this perhaps be handled differently next time? I admit that I'm not
familiar with the R
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Lyes Saadi wrote:
> Fortunately, Icon Development Kit is under CC0, so we're kinda saved
> from a Licensing apocalypse (although, I have to admit that this is not
> ideal).
The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/H
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora.
>
> Banned for code, not content. Icons are not code.
Good point! Thanks for the correction.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Thursday, August 25, 2022 Carl George wrote:
> [root@f38-container:~]# repoquery --repo
> rawhide-source,rawhide-modular-source \
> > --quiet --queryformat '%{name}' --archlist src --whatrequires
> > sqlcipher-devel
> libgda
> python-peewee
> sqlitebrowser
> [root@f38-container:~]# repoquery --r
Hi Fedorians,
I'm back with more ansible license updates. Upstream, some of the community
Ansible Collections have adopted the REUSE specification, which makes it much
easier to determine the overall license. For collections that have adopted
this, the license texts are all stored as files in o
Aug 26, 2022 7:02:06 AM Michal Konecny :
If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please
subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ or
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61. We will stop
sending them in the future.
Why is that? I appre
Hi Fedorians,
The license of ansible-collection-community-mysql has been updated from
"GPLv3+ and Python" to "GPL-3.0-or-later AND PSF-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause".
See
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-collection-community-mysql/c/242bcaa709334c0a5ec0d78d1a2da3daaae532ce?branch=rawhide.
--
On Sunday, August 28, 2022 Jerry Kiely wrote:
> I did remove it and got the following result:
>
> rfpkg mockbuild -N --root fedora-36-x86_64-rpmfusion_free
> sources file doesn't exist. Source files download skipped.
> Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl
> Failed to get n
On 22/08/30 05:57PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:04:27PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > Upstream has changed the naming of the "minizip" package to
> > "minizip-ng" and we should follow their naming so there is no
> > confusion about
Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini :
Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora
packages?
I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I
reached out to them about moby-engine and containerd at the end of May,
and they said they no longer h
On Friday, September 2, 2022 Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Side note: I have asked for co-maintainers for those packages a couple
> > times, but so far, I have not found any. Perhaps one of the CoreOS people
> > would be interested? It seems those packages are used a lot there based
> > on the bug reports
Sep 3, 2022 4:18:19 AM Miro Hrončok :
We'd like to move https://gitlab.com/fberat/mass-prebuild/ into the
Fedora namespace, ideally under something like:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/
What do we need to do?
Hi Miro,
You have to file an infra ticket. See [1].
It would be nice i
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
> breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
> it correct to do:
>
> %ifnarch riscv64
> Patch123: downstream.patch
> %endif
>
> given th
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Peter Robinson wrote:
> it would probably be easier to join and become a packager by
> packaging a random leaf package no one would use, then as a packager
> pick up an random orphaned package that's in the core distro and then
> just compromise the distro that way TBH
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make
> appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the
> same package to be available?
> Is this allowed for EPEL?
You can package compat packages as long
On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> If
> you want to enforce such a policy, find sponsors and buy devices for all
> Fedora contributors.
I kind of agree with this. See what PyPi is doing[1]. I don't think anyone who
maintains one package should get one, but perhaps pro
On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Currently I do not have any 2FA enabled
> on my Fedora account
I have 2FA set up on my account and it works okay. You'd use `fkinit` instead
of `kinit` that requires special setup[1] to work with 2FA. It doesn't work
with the GOA kerberos
On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > mobile device
>
> Requires proprietary Google services.
As has already been said, that's not true. Google Authenticator is far from
the only software that supports the TOTP standard.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Aug 29, 2022 1:32:21 PM Ben Cotton :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning2
== Summary ==
Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora ''38''-39,
SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default.
Fedora ''38'' will do a "jump scare", introducing t
Hi Fedorians,
I think the security tracking bug filing process needs to be amended. The
current process is quite frustrating for me and other contributors. This
is especially bad for Go CVEs, which there are lot of.
Red Hat Product Security creates a single tracking bug for Fedora{, EPEL}
_a
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> First of all we are not going to remove old DNF from the distribution.
Isn't that what
> The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
> and DNF plugins (core and extras). python3-dnf and LIBDNF (`libdnf`,
> `python3
Sep 8, 2022 8:45:19 AM Maxwell G via devel
:
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
First of all we are not going to remove old DNF from the distribution.
Isn't that what
The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
and DNF plugins (cor
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 Neal Gompa wrote:
> Fedora maintainers are CC'd often on the parent bug to bypass the
> private bug status while a bug is "under development". This has
> happened a few times for me as a maintainer of crypto-adjacent
> packages.
That's a good point. I guess they coul
On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the
> CVE should be said in the main tracer. The fedora tracker should be used
> just to not forget to fix this in Fedora.
Why not both? We shouldn't have to reference two differe
On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> >
On Mon Sep 12, 2022, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 09. 09. 22 v 17:09 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
> > On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the
> >> CVE should be said in the main tra
Hi Tobias,
On Fri Sep 16, 2022, Tobias Zellner wrote:
> some weeks ago I opened the bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109630
I commented on your bug and submitted a fix.
> Since there is no response to this bug, and following your guide lines
> (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
Hi Huzaifa,
Thank you for your response and for getting it to me despite the issues
with the mailing list.
You have to subscribe[1] to the devel list to post to it. There
has been a lot of good discussion about this on the ML since my
original post[2].
I am forwarding this to the list to keep th
Sep 18, 2022 Otto Liljalaakso :
18. syyskuuta 2022 1.53.45 GMT+03:00 Thomas Dickey
kirjoitti:
The release monitoring project for libXft
(https://release-monitoring.org/project/1777/)
doesn't appear to have noticed the release of 2.3.6 a week ago.
Any clues on how to fix this?
When I open that
On Fri Sep 2, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>
> Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini :
>
> > Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora
> > packages?
> I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I
> reached o
On Tue Sep 6, 2022, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
> and DNF plugins (core and extras). python3-dnf and LIBDNF (`libdnf`,
> `python3-hawkey`) will be obsoleted by `fedora-obsolete-packages`.
I am worri
Sep 25, 2022 4:22:14 AM Avi Alkalay :
I’ll check your links but I’m not sure it is clear for me what else
should I do beyond the PR, bug report and Copr builds. After your
message, it is still unclear for me if maintainers will take over and
accept my PR.
Hi Avi,
It looks like the pull reques
On Sat Sep 24, 2022, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Sep 6, 2022, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> > The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
> > and DNF plugins (core and extras). python3-dnf and LIBDNF (`libdnf`,
> > `python3-hawkey`) will be obso
Hi Pete, et. al,
On Fri Sep 16, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> I am forwarding this to the list to keep the community in the
> loop. I will respond in more detail later.
I apologize for taking so long to actually respond to this. It seems
this slipped under my radar.
> From: P
have other inputs or desires, feel free to let me know and I will ensure we
address them accordingly.
Best,
Pete
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 6:03 PM Maxwell G wrote:
> Hi Pete, et. al,
>
> On Fri Sep 16, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > I am forwarding this to the list to keep the c
On Thu Oct 6, 2022 at 1:35 AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 10. 22 23:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 08:40:12PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> some time ago I've built the Free Pascal Compiler [0] for EPEL9,
> >> and recently I got the idea it m
Hi Fedorians,
I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that
dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be
helpful for the wider community to test dnf5 and report which currently
unimplemented
On Wed Oct 5, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> Hi Fedorians,
>
> I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that
> dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
>
> The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be
>
On Thu Oct 13, 2022 at 17:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > And using Let's Encrypt for private mirrors is sufficiently painful that I
> > wouldn't recommend it.
>
> Set up a subdomain like vpn.example.com, point it to the public IP, then
> configure the VPN's internal DNS to resolve vpn
On 22/10/06, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approve
On Sat Oct 15, 2022 at 19:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Perhaps the "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to
> > tomli" approach should be more strongly recommended? tomllib is based
> > off of tomli's code and is yet another thing that has to be bootstrapped
> > during Python
On Tue Oct 25, 2022 at 15:46 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> * 2023-07-17: Expected side tag-merge (pessimistic)
> * 2023-07-19: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
> ** The mass rebuild happens with the fourth beta. We might need to
> rebuild Python packages later in exceptional case.
> ** If the Koji side-tag is n
On Thu Nov 3, 2022 at 06:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> When will this silliness ever stop? It just does not make sense to
> explicitly list every single file in the RPM. Wildcards are often the only
> reasonable way.
Nobody is saying that you have to list every single file in the packa
On Tue Nov 8, 2022 at 12:13 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thought I'd try to get on with the times and do the Sequoia change via a
> PR instead of just pushing as we've traditionally done. So far so good,
> but it throws up an error which I have no idea how to debug:
>
> https://artifact
On Wed Nov 16, 2022 at 08:25 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> On 11/16/22 06:09, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > On November 14, 2022 7:18:45 PM UTC, "Timothée Ravier"
> > wrote:
> > I'm using docker for $dayjob and would be willing to help out a bit, but I
> > will not be the main maintainer, as I don't feel
On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> go-compilers
> go-srpm-macros
These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's
now a subpackage of go-rpm-macros. go-compilers is Obsoleted by
go-rpm-macros itself, but it looks like it has not yet been retired.
I've
On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 12:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 11. 22 3:38, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> go-compilers
> >> go-srpm-macros
> >
> > These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-mac
On Thu Nov 10, 2022 at 15:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReproducibleBuildsClampMtimes
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal wil
On Tue Nov 29, 2022 at 18:51 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello.
>
> RHBZ began to demand Microsoft font "Segoe UI" since yesterday:
>
> font-family: SFMono-Medium, SF Mono, Segoe UI Mono, "Roboto Mono",
> "Ubuntu Mono", Menlo, Courier, monospace
>
> > SFMono-Medium, SF Mono
>
> Not p
On Tue Nov 29, 2022 at 12:57 CST, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 6/16/22 15:53, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced in order
Nov 29, 2022 2:31:29 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
does anyone have a complete log? It does not show up on
meetbot.fedoraproject.org
On Tue Nov 29, 2022 at 22:13 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I just saw gotmax's comment after pasting this in ;)
And I saw you beat me to replying to Kevin after I had already sent the
same thing. The more the merrier I guess :).
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
On Monday, May 16, 2022 11:00:06 AM CDT you wrote:
> With the release of ansible-collection-community-docker 2.5.1, the license
> has changed from `GPLv3+` > `GPLv3+ and Python`.
This same change applies to the new release of
ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq.
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotma
On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 3:11:39 PM CDT Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> We see no reason why not to do that. It should not cause any harm. If
**you** know of any reason we should not propose
> this, please tell us now.
I already brought this up previously, but how will we handle license
identifiers suc
On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 7:08:13 PM CDT Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> I don't think that is going to work unless the rpm spec
> file support would be backported to previous releases
> (without another macro that tries to do some magic).
I don't follow. What "rpm spec file support" are you referring to?
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:14:14 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote:
> Does a marker of the conversion need to be visible in the binary packages?
I think it should be. According to the Change Proposal, "the use of a
standardized identifier for license will align Fedora with other distributions.
And allows
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:25:40 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
> At least in the MIT license case, the MIT identifier exists there. One
> reason Tom Callaway resisted changing to SPDX in the past was that
> they never resolved the problem with the MIT identifier. It's
> effectively a family identifier,
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:15:54 PM CDT Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> On 5/26/22 15:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > Other than the MIT case (and it should not be swept
> > under the rug), are there any substantial use of
> > licenses in Fedora where the Fedora license id
> > and the SPDX license id can
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:58:54 PM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
> There's only one MIT license carve-out I know of: X11. The rest are
> classified the same.
I don't exactly follow. Are you referring to the fact that the X11 license also
falls under Fedora's "MIT" identifier?
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@
Jun 8, 2022 8:51:45 AM Matthew Miller :
> The differences outlined there result in different constraints.
I disagree that flathub flatpaks breaking our policies is incidental. The way
it
solves the "problem with Linux app distribution" is (in part) by allowing
developers to package and distribu
On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 8:59:21 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote:
> The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora.
It also targets RHEL, CentOS Stream, and the various RHEL rebuilds.
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
Hi everyone,
I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go-
sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to
do. In addition to the Fedora branches, this package also exists on EPEL 7.
That branch has not been maintained for a while and h
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 5:55:34 PM CDT Stewart Smith wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think we can [help with EPEL 7] given the
> likely packaging differences
I'd be surprised if there's major differences, unless AL 2 backports newer go
macros.
> the containerd version differences
containerd in E
On Friday, June 17, 2022 3:32:13 PM CDT Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Without that, it makes it very hard for us to keep the Go stack up-to-date
> and in working order, because the "go-sig" list / bugzilla account does not
> get CC'd on new bugs that way, and your bugs do not show up in our BugZ
On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Is is possible include builds of one side-tag into other side-tag ?
It is also possible to `koji tag-build [dest side tag] [NEVR(s) from other
side tag]`, which might work for your use case. I suppose setting one side tag
to inherit
On Monday, May 9, 2022 10:20:25 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> The license of `ansible` 2.9.x has been corrected from `GPLv3+` to `GPLv3+
> and BSD and Python and MIT and ASL 2.0`. The previous `License:` tag did
> not properly account for the multi-licensing.
>
> Please note
Jun 23, 2022 12:14:26 PM Miro Hrončok :
> Alrighty, in that case:
>
> $ comm -23 <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
> openssl1.1-devel | grep src$ | sort) <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source}
> --whatrequires openssl-devel | grep src$ | sort)
> botan2-0:2.19.1-2.fc37.src
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 1:50:09 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Not sure what github has to do with things here?
Lumír said:
> With quay.io, we are able to produce new container images directly from
> Github CI and rebuild them regularly without complicated update process
> and without any need to
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 6:40:04 AM CDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-ntlm-auth orphan 0 weeks
> ago
I have picked this up, as it's a transitive dependency of ansible-core. I
would welcome co-maintainers :).
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 6:25:00 AM CDT Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Whoever is working with that right now is welcome to my notes and
> tools, at https://github.com/nkadel/ansiblerepo/
I have glanced at it before. @kevin and I maintain ansible, ansible-core, and
many of the standalone collectio
Jun 24, 2022 1:59:40 PM Jason Tibbitts :
> When a package is deprecated, the intent is that no new dependencies on
> any deprecated package would appear in the distribution, either by new
> packages or from existing packages adding dependencies. Of course, I
> don't know what actually checks thi
On Friday, June 24, 2022 3:47:54 PM CDT Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> When you go to a package's repo on src.fedoraproject.org,
> on the top of the page, you get this nice table that lists
> active Fedora and EPEL releases, and for each of those,
> prints the package version currently in stable an
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 9:46:17 AM CDT Benjamin Beasley wrote:
> what happens if you end up doing the mass rebuild
> with a pre-release version? Would you need to do a second mass rebuild with
> the final version between the beta and final freezes?
Yes. as go binaries are statically linked, if
On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:30:14 PM CDT Robbie Harwood wrote:
> I have started the responsive maintainer process due to lack of contact
> through bugzilla mail. Specifically, this is about an epel9 branch,
> which has been repeatedly requested since March (including an offer to
> maintain the bra
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
