Hi Tobias, On Fri Sep 16, 2022, Tobias Zellner wrote: > some weeks ago I opened the bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109630
I commented on your bug and submitted a fix. > Since there is no response to this bug, and following your guide lines > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), > I opend Non-responsive maintainer check f a for this package For the record, the maintainer is fpokorny. Indeed, it seems that maintainer is unresponsive. They haven't had any recent activity in distgit. Other Go SIG members have been maintaining their packages for some time. They are also slated to be removed[1] from the packager group as part of the new Inactive Packager process[2]. This won't actually happen until the end of October, so feel free to continue with the standard Nonresponsive Maintainer process. [1]: https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/222 [2]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/ -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
