On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:25:40 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
> At least in the MIT license case, the MIT identifier exists there. One
> reason Tom Callaway resisted changing to SPDX in the past was that
> they never resolved the problem with the MIT identifier. It's
> effectively a family identifier, just like in Fedora. The difference
> is that some MIT license variants got separate identifiers, but not
> all.

My understanding is that `SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT` specifically refers to 
the MIT/Expat license, whose text is available on the SPDX `MIT` license 
page[1]. SPDX already has a couple distinct MIT license variant identifiers 
that we don't have. 

[1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html

-- 
Thanks,

Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to