Re: PSA: pytest 5 now finally available in rawhide

2020-05-31 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > the pytest package (python3-pytest) has been updated to 5.4.2. > > In case it gives you trouble, you can pin an older version: > >BuildRrequires: %{py3_dist pytest} < 5 > > Or: > >BuildRrequires: python3dist(pytest) < 5 > >

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-06-03 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:08 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, one problem after another with FreeCAD, maybe I'll get them fixed > before f33 is released :) > > /builddir/build/BUILD/FreeCAD-0.18.4/src/Gui/DAGView/DAGView.cpp: In > constructor 'Gui::DAG::View::View(QWidget*)': > /builddir/build/BUILD/F

Re: Proposal: Install gparted to Live installers

2020-06-04 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of > non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the > ESP partition even though I can see it using efibootmgr. > > In troubleshooting this and w

Re: Proposal: Install gparted to Live installers

2020-06-04 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:48 PM Felipe Borges wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ian McInerney > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw > wrote: > >> > >> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sor

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-05 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:51 PM Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 05/06/2020 10:15, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > [...] Apart from > > browsers, LibreOffice is going to use LLVM/Clang from Release 7.0 too, > > so that would potentially be another added work to LibreOffice packagers > > in the future.

Re: how to correctly remove a subpackage ?

2020-06-12 Thread Ian McInerney
Can you be more specific about the package structure (or provide a link to the spec)? Does the new package X-2 (or X-b-2) still contain the same functionality that was present inside X-a-1, so if a user installs one of those, they get the same program just without the dependency? -Ian On Fri, Jun

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

2020-06-15 Thread Ian McInerney
> > ...snip... > > What I propose is: As part of the retirement process we add the to > fedora-retired-packages: > Obsoletes: foo < %{latestversion+1} > And during upgrade from F37->F38 the package will be removed. > > I am not a fan of this part. One release cycle seems awfully tight for this, a

Re: Highlights from the latest Copr release 2020-06-10

2020-06-16 Thread Ian McInerney
...snip... > > - There's now more fair build scheduler. Previously, no matter whether the > "background" attribute was set or not for the build - once builder was > allocated for a concrete copr user - copr never terminated the builder > as long as the user kept filling the build queue with

Re: Why fedpkg build failed ?

2020-06-17 Thread Ian McInerney
If you take a look inside the root.log of the build task here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4647/45824647/root.log, you will see the actual error that is being reported. It appears that a depoendency of the package (aqsis-core) cannot be installed due to an issue with how it is pa

Re: wireguard kmod package

2020-06-24 Thread Ian McInerney
There is an akmod-wireguard package in RPMFusion, so you probably installed it from there are somepoint. You should be able to just uninstall the akmod. -Ian On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:03 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 6/24/20 4:35 PM, Laura Abbott wr

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-25 Thread Ian McInerney
> > ...snip... > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide. > ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called > nano-editor. > ** nano-editor to include > /usr/lib/environment.d/10-nano.conf, which sets > $EDITOR to nano. > > With this approach, if nano is uninstalle

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-25 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ian McInerney > wrote: > >> > >> ...snip... > >> == Scope == > >> * Proposal owners: > >> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide. > >>

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-25 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kamil Dudka wrote: > ...snip... > > Gentoo Linux uses the /etc/env.d tree to globally set environment > variables: > > https://devmanual.gentoo.org/tasks-reference/environment/index.html > > It worked there long time before systemd was invented. But clearing t

Re: wireguard kmod package

2020-06-25 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:49 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > ...snip... > > That would be a rather serious flaw in the wireguard tools package to > have a dep on akmod-wireguard when it has been upstream and included > in the Fedora kernel-modules package for a few months at this point. > > The wire

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-26 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:49 AM Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:44:06 PM CEST Ian McInerney wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kamil Dudka wrote: > > > ...snip... > > > > > > Gentoo Linux uses the /etc/env.d tree to globally s

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-26 Thread Ian McInerney
> > > If the only case is git... which by the way behaves in that way even > on Windows... isn't it a git problem? > I like not having a default editor and a more user-friendly approach > would be to ask the user what they want on the installation or on the > first run. > > git is not the only prog

Re: [soon to review] Issue with OpenShadingLanguage build

2020-06-28 Thread Ian McInerney
It's failing because OSL needs C++14 or higher for LLVM 10 (as the CMake error hints at). Try passing in "-DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=14" to you CMake arguments. -Ian On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 4:48 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > I am getting OpenShadingLanguage package needed for Blender

Cleaning up comps packages in rawhide

2020-06-30 Thread Ian McInerney
I have been going through the packages listed in the comps file for rawhide (given in here https://pagure.io/fedora-comps) to clean it up and remove any packages that are currently not in any Fedora rawhide repos, and to update the architectures for packages that are only available on certain on

Re: Need assistance to build openshadinglanguage

2020-07-12 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:15 PM Andy Mender wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 21:47, Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > >> %build >> %cmake \ >>-B build \ >>-DUSE_BOOST_WAVE=ON \ >>-DUSE_PARTIO=OFF \ >>-DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=14 \ >>-DLLVM_STATIC=0 \ >>-DENABLERTTI=ON \ >>-D

Re: Need assistance to build openshadinglanguage

2020-07-12 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12/07/20 12:33 +0100, Ian McInerney wrote: >This is what the upstream project explicitly says to do when using LLVM10: > > > https://github.com/imageworks/OpenShadingLanguage/blob/master/src/cmake/externalpackages.cmake

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

2020-03-31 Thread Ian McInerney
Leigh, > Do you know how many >> existing integrations with pagure there are? > > > No. Our analysis will tell us that in due course > I am concerned by this approach to the decision-making. In many of your replies, you mention wanting to get feature-parity with the current tooling and systems,

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-01 Thread Ian McInerney
> > > x11vnc hubbitus > It looks like this one just needs a new build kicked off for Rawhide and the Rawhide spec merged into f32, since it was a GCC10 failure and it appears the spec has been fixed for rawhide since then. -Ian ___ devel m

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > [...] > Orphaned: > > audacity > Taken. Will start builds that fix this later today. -Ian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:30 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > Taken. Will start builds that fix this later today. > > > > -Ian > You could try > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/audacity-freeworld.git/tree/Fix-gcc-10-compile-issue.patch

env inside .desktop file

2020-04-07 Thread Ian McInerney
The Audacity package is currently getting desktop lint errors on x86_64 and armv7hl saying: "diag" : "Exec file /usr/bin/env not found, even in noarch", when it uses the exec line: "Exec=env UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 audacity %F" inside its .desktop file. To me, I don't see anything wrong with this

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-10 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > For pam_url I need help from someone with C skills, since there's an > error at build time: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43192974 > > Looks like another GCC10 fno-common prob

Re: Review swaps

2020-05-07 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:03 PM Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some > reviews in exchange? > > python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183297

Re: AskFedora: Can someone please answer this question on security fixes on

2020-05-16 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:39 AM Dominique Martinet wrote: > Hi, > > Ankur Sinha wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020: > > As subject says: > > > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117 > > > > (I looked around a bit and couldn't find any documentation on this). > > I'

Re: Intent to retire OCE (OpenCascade Community Edition)

2019-11-15 Thread Ian McInerney
A repoquery for build-requires on the OCE-devel package only gives these 4 packages: gmsh-0:4.4.1-3.fc32.src kicad-1:5.1.4-5.fc32.src netgen-mesher-0:6.2.1810-4.fc32.src smesh-0:6.7.5-7.fc31.src I know that switching KiCad to use opencascade instead should be simple (just switch a CMake flag), but

Re: Orphaning two security packages

2019-11-17 Thread Ian McInerney
I would be willing to take on Zulucrypt, since I use it, but I will need someone to sponsor me as a packager (I am not in the group). Thanks, -Ian On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 1:47 PM Raphael Groner wrote: > Hi, > > due to lack of time I've to orphan zulucrypt and sirikali packages. > > Both package

Re: Intent to retire OCE (OpenCascade Community Edition)

2019-11-18 Thread Ian McInerney
Richard, FYI, it appears that you can actually download the source packages from a public-facing git repository on their site (instead of having to link through the login page as your spec currently does). The Git repository is: https://git.dev.opencascade.org/gitweb/?p=occt.git The source links

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

2019-11-22 Thread Ian McInerney
Is it needed to build any packages in the main Fedora repo? If not, then why not just make a COPR for it instead of putting it in the mainline repos. -Ian On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:42 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:47 PM Leigh Scott > wrote: > >> > Please don't revi

Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

2019-11-27 Thread Ian McInerney
Tex isn't really the best example for the insane package numbers (since the main Tex system, CTAN, actually does define them as separate packages). It would be interesting to know if anyone actually does just install one or two rather than all... I know that I usually just install all of them on ne

Re: Ancient Boost version

2020-02-11 Thread Ian McInerney
Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main F32 changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it. -Ian On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > On 11/02/2020 10:29, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >

Re: Need help with my packages

2020-03-01 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:31 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help. If > you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or > becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know. The full list > follows. Many of these I jus

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-04 Thread Ian McInerney
What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 that are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages have been retired since python2 is retired now, but currently DNF is blocking the upgrade of the system (not just marking them for removal). Here are the

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-04 Thread Ian McInerney
-03-04 at 18:19 +0000, Ian McInerney wrote: > > > What is supposed to happen with any packages that depend on python2 > that > > > are currently installed on the system? I know that the actual packages > have > > > been retired since python2 is retired now, but curren

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-04 Thread Ian McInerney
> Problem 3: problem with installed package > texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch > - package texlive-stix-9:svn47652-18.fc32.noarch requires > stix-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be installed > - texlive-stix-9:svn47652-15.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repositor

Re: Self Introduction: Gonçalo Pereira

2020-03-08 Thread Ian McInerney
Unfortunately, Qucs appears to be in a problematic state right now. There are two main issues with it: 1) It has a requires on freehdl, but freehdl was orphaned a year ago so it is not in F30/31/32. 2) It fails to build in F32, the Bugzilla entry seems to suggest that this is fixed if Qucs gets up

Re: Self Introduction: Gonçalo Pereira

2020-03-08 Thread Ian McInerney
> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 5:55 PM wrote: > >> Thank you for the update on the status of the qucs package. >> I will try to create a package and if that goes well I will get back to >> you. >> Best Regards, >> Gonçalo Pereira >> >> On 8 Mar 2020

Re: Self Introduction: Gonçalo Pereira

2020-03-08 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:12 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira < goncalo_pere...@outlook.pt> wrote: > Hello Alain and Ian, > > I definitely understand your struggle Alain, as an electrical engineer I > also find myself dealing with this kind of problems, it is really > frustrating. I have been using

Re: Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the > fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing > you need: > > It

Re: Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> With the fedora 32 release draw

Re: Problem opening postscript files in F33

2020-10-17 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:46 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > Hi, > I found that postscript files that do not open with either evince or > okular > in F33 (I am aware that they use poppler as backend so probably the > culprit is > here). Evince tells me that it loading the file but it never ends.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (see note about xinetd)​

2020-11-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich wrote: > > Affected (co)maintainers (either directly or via packages' dependencies): > > < cut > > > raveit65: sgpio > > I am still wondering why i am listed here as (co)maintainers. > I do not maintain this package. > > Cheers > Wolfgang > It is

Re: git -> cvs (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (see note about xinetd))

2020-11-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:32 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Like tftp we may replace xinetd by systemd service files [1] , > > if we replace cvs-inetd by a systemd service, the problem is solved. > > > > [1] > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tftp/c/15a26fcde8a007

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (see note about xinetd)​

2020-11-11 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:40 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich wrote: > I know where my package are listed at > https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/projects :) > But... > [root@mother rave]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires sgpio > Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 1:28:41 am Mi 11 Nov 2020 > 17:0

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

2020-12-04 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake > should > > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly > should > > have an expli

Re: Preview appdata file?

2020-12-21 Thread Ian McInerney
gnome-software doesn't ingest the appdata file directly, it is instead looking at bundled data from appstream-builder. I think the local file gnome-software wants to ingest should be created by running appstream-builder on the RPM of the program with your updated appdata file. -Ian On Mon, Dec 21

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-12-30 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements > > > == Summary == > Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include > -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. This proposal would remove > -ffat-lto-objects from the def

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: fedpop

2020-09-24 Thread Ian McInerney
In your original email you said that this resolves CVE bug [1], which says in it: "NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-01-02 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 5:33 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/30/20 3:48 PM, Ian McInerney wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton > <mailto:bcot...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOB

Appdata file location and the packaging guidelines

2021-01-16 Thread Ian McInerney
I noticed due to an upstream bug report for a project I am on that the Fedora packaging guidelines still say that GUI applications should install their files as appdata.xml files and not metainfo.xml files (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/). The upstream spec f

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-02-02 Thread Ian McInerney
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:28 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > snip... > > > > What is this macro going to be called? I would like to get an early > > start on updating my packages. > No idea. I'm open to suggestions. > > Any update on the name of this macro/its implementation? I am working on revising a s

Re: CMake FindBoost module doesn't like boost 1.75

2021-02-03 Thread Ian McInerney
It looks like upstream CMake hasn't updated the FindBoost.cmake file they bundle ( https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/blob/master/Modules/FindBoost.cmake#L1604). I have opened an upstream issue with CMake at https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/21773 since this also affects some of

Re: Proven Packagers: update Audacity

2021-02-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:58 PM Germano Massullo wrote: > Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this > time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no > up-to-date and is highly unstable and crashes every time you use it > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Ian McInerney
I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to spec files are added in bug reports, and now those links end up on a page cann

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

2021-02-10 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > > > is why there is a main

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-02-23 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:38 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hello, > > please see attached rebuild of autoconf-dependencies [1]. I would like to > ask maintainers of the dependent packages to check if their packages are > buildable with autoconf-2.71. It seems that lots of packages are checking > for

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

2021-03-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:12 PM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said: > > This change isn't big — it is simply expanding > > > > * NAME=Fedora to NAME="Fedora Linux" and > > * PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux [##] ([edition or spin]) > > > > in the file /etc/os-release. > > I have se

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

2021-03-09 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Linux_in_os-release > > == Summary == > > "Fedora" is the name of our project. Our general-purpose Linux > distribution is "Fedora Linux". Let's refer to it that way in the OS itself. > > == Owner ==

Disable bodhi auto-update creation on rawhide?

2021-03-30 Thread Ian McInerney
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the update when I submit package updates that need them. I would prefer the behavio

Re: memleax spec file and review

2021-04-04 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, 21:53 Germano Massullo, wrote: > Good day, I am creating a spec file [0] for memleax memory leaks > analyzer [1], but during build [2] I am getting error "invalid option: > --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu.". Where can be the problem? > Thank you > > [0]: https://pagure.io/meml

Re: nokey warning during F33->F34 upgrade (fstrm package)

2021-05-01 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 7:42 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-05-01 2:42 a.m., Germano Massullo wrote: > > Il 30/04/21 18:33, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > >>> After running > >>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34 > >>> an

Re: Packages in need of a new maintainer

2021-05-02 Thread Ian McInerney
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:28 AM Johannes Lips wrote: > Dear all, > > after quite some years, I would like to hand over the following packages > to new maintainers. I will not orphan them if no one picks them up, but it > would be great if someone with an interest in these packages could take > the

Flatpak install and DNF removal

2021-05-02 Thread Ian McInerney
I was just experimenting after poking at this bug http s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847265, and I found some interesting behavior. This is how to reproduce it: 1) Use the Cinnamon live CD 2) Install a random flatpak (note, since this is on live you have to deal with the space issue fir

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-05-18 Thread Ian McInerney
> emacs-auctex orphan 1 weeks > ago > > This one is going to break some non-emacs packages as well because the spec actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview: $ r

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-05-19 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > spec > > actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and > > is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview: > > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview > > Last metadata expira

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-05-19 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber > wrote: > > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong > anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone > can still take up auctex, fix the ema

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-08 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:46 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:18:10PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones > > : > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton w

Re: F35FailsToInstall: cmst

2021-06-11 Thread Ian McInerney
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > I received a message from bugzilla [1] that my package cmst cannot be > installed on f35. > How can I solve this ? > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964628 > The bugzilla is saying that it can't find the package c

Pipewire and Jack usage in an RPM

2021-06-17 Thread Ian McInerney
I was just trying amock build of Audacity to test some updates and I am now having trouble installing it on F34 because of a conflict between jack-audio-connection-kit and pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit: $ sudo dnf install ./audacity-3.0.2-3.fc34.src.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 2:19:21

Re: Pipewire and Jack usage in an RPM

2021-06-17 Thread Ian McInerney
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:40 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > Why are you trying to install a srpm? > > D'oh *facepalm*. That is what I get when I don't pay attention when copying the rpm from one folder to another. Yep, it works on the actual RPM now. -Ian ___

Re: F35 Change: Filtered Flathub Applications (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-30 Thread Ian McInerney
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications > > == Summary == > Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote > that is a filtered view of Flathub. > > > == Detailed Description == > 'Note that t

Re: F35 Change: Filtered Flathub Applications (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-30 Thread Ian McInerney
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:43 AM Ian McInerney > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications > >>

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Switch to JXL format for Default Wallpaper (self-contained)

2025-05-25 Thread Ian McInerney
Was this change coordinated at all with the maintainers of other display managers? Because I updated my install from F41 to F42, and now lightdm is not displaying any background and the logs are stating: [+0.29s] DEBUG: background.vala:605: Regenerating backgrounds [+0.29s] DEBUG: background.val

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Switch to JXL format for Default Wallpaper (self-contained)

2025-05-25 Thread Ian McInerney
I'm not using lightdm-gtk though, just lightdm, and I don't see any background settings inside /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf (and I also haven't modified it, so there isn't any rpmnew version of it). -Ian -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: CentOS8/RHEL8/Fedora: dependency control: make gcc-c++ provide g++,required for pulseaudio.

2023-03-25 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 5:07 AM wrote: The GCC spec file already contains Provides: g++ = %{version}-%{release} and doing a `dnf install g++` does try to install gcc-c++. So please be specific about the error you are seeing and provide more information, and especially why you say this is requir

F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing. Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a 3rd-party repository (the Intel oneAPI repo), and it i

Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean > > install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I > > haven't seen befo

Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-10 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 20:19, Ian McInerney via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> On 4/9/23 16

Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

2023-04-10 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:35 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 08:24, Ian McInerney via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: Change my new package name in src.fedoraporject.org ?

2023-04-13 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > yesterday I created my first package repository: >> > >> > https://src.fedoraproje

Re: Orphaning despite having maintainers?

2023-04-27 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:25 AM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ke, 26 huhti 2023, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Alexander Bokovoy > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This morning I woke up to find that packages I maintain were orphaned > >> out of blue. Nobody contacted t

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: wxGTK

2022-12-22 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted against > trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK with a SONAME bump > was built for f37+ but not all dependencies rebuilt. > > This was announced back in July while F

Re: Source download behind login?

2022-12-28 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 5:42 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on updating the opencasecade package[1] but the main downloads > require a login. > > Is there a specific reason it needs to be their premade tarballs? If not, it looks like you should be able to pull the tarball from the tag in th

Re: Tenacity

2023-02-09 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: > > > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > >> wxGTK should have that... > > > > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X > series > > as far as I can t

Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2023-02-16 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implem

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

2023-02-27 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
Upstream appears to be disabling position independent code for some reason in the crispy-core library: https://github.com/contour-terminal/contour/blob/master/src/crispy/CMakeLists.txt#L100 (although they are using no-pie, which is odd since it is a library and I would have expected no-pic instead,

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

2023-02-28 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote: > Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but > when installing built contour package, it shows the following error: > ``` > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(

Re: Unretire IWYU - Include What You Use

2023-03-02 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Benson Muite wrote: > Would like to unretire Include What You Use > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012 Taken, > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

2024-08-06 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > libreoffice is done. > inkscape, sadly, uses the unstable API and fails: > In file included from /usr/include/poppler/Object.h:44, > from /usr/include/poppler/GfxState.h:41, > from /usr/include/poppler/Gfx.h:40, > from > /buil

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change - batch #3 of all remaining packages

2024-08-28 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28. 08. 24 v 12:38 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > Please exclude pythran: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pythran/pull-request/31 > > Ack. Excluded. (But still included in the files below) > > Also, could you please send a plain list of packages you plan to cha

Re: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39

2023-07-06 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > This is a status update for > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb > > It doesn't include the

Re: Rawhide build failures

2023-08-21 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
I think it is actually because of a change proposal, there was a recent email about the webkit2gtk4.0 package changing: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IFRPWZNEFEGXGQFRNTH4LTFFLTJ5DOCL/, so it is actually a problem I think. -Ian On Mon, Aug 21,

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

2023-09-14 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 00:17 Neal Gompa, wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco > wrote: > > > > On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11 > > > applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should wo

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

2023-09-14 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 09:24 Michael J Gruber, wrote: > Am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa >: > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:24 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco < > stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > A quest

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-21)

2023-09-22 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > Minutes: > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.html > Minutes (text): > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.tx

Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?

2023-10-10 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE > nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing > include dirs: > > > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or > di

Re: Libcmis solib bump

2023-10-12 Thread Ian McInerney via devel
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:39 AM Gwyn Ciesla via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Libcmis 0.6.0 is coming to rawhide, and libreoffice-TexMaths, > openoffice.org-diafilter, python-paperwork-backend, and libreoffice are > being rebuild against it. > > Thanks for taking care of this, bu

  1   2   >