Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:41 PM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 2019-09-02 13:00: > > clojure kushal, orphan, s4504kr, 1 > > weeks ago > > salimma, walters > > I would like to take clojure, filed a releng ticket:

Re: Unannounced libproj soname bump

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > I noticed proj-5.2.0 was rebased to 6.2.0 in Fedora ≥ 31. This rebase > changed libproj soname from libproj.so.13 to libproj.so.15. I don't think this soname bump even happened by accident, because the .so file names %files entries in the .spec

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 09. 19 14:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Be advised that clojure has failed to build since fedora 23, according to > > koji. > > I wonder why it hasn't been retired at some point ... > > The ma

Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a package t

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mat Booth wrote: >> >> Directly dependent packages of jboss-jstl-1.2-api: >> - jboss-jsf-2.1-api >> - jboss-jsf-2.2-api Hi Mat! > IMO, you should just retire the jboss/wildfly stack right now. It has not > been maintained for years already: > https://lists.fedor

Orphaned adapta-gtk-theme, adapta-backgrounds

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello packagers, I've just orphaned both adapta-gtk-theme and adapta-backgrounds. The upstream project is more or less dead, since the main developer left after getting a lot of negative feedback for the release of a big refresh / redesign of the Adapta GTK theme (which was then reverted). The fe

bodhi branched updates: how many days until stable - 3, 7, 14?

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I seem to remember that bodhi updates for branched releases only required 3 days in testing until they could be pushed to stable. However, for fedora 31, the default (and minimum) is 7 days, and for critpath packages, the default (and minimum) 14 days, like for normal "released" fedo

Re: bodhi branched updates: how many days until stable - 3, 7, 14?

2019-09-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 09. 09. 19 16:40, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Did some policy change occur which I am not aware of, or is bodhi just > > misconfigured again for branched? > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8161 Ah, s

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:23 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hello packagers, > > > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > > maintenance for some Java packages, and non

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:17 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan > Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As Rob had responded earlier, he is away for few weeks. A while back, I > > spoke

Re: Possibly unresponsive maintainer: vakwetu

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 09. 19 12:05, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:17 PM Fabio Valentini > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan > > > > Krishnamoorthy wrote: > > >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 6:11 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:49:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Request package ownership via releng issues: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues > > How? Click "New Issue", fill out "package_unorphan" or "package_unretirement" template, su

Orphaned pdf-renderer (leaf package)

2019-09-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
I've just orphaned the pdf-renderer package, which was maintained by the Stewardship SIG. There are no dependent packages left in fedora, since itext was recently retired. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:18 PM Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: > > I'll take cassandar Hi Ricardo, You should be aware that to keep cassandra alive you'll probably need to adopt a few dozen more packages, since they're dependencies of cassandra. This includes logback, groovy, and gradle (whi

Re: Which arch should we add to Copr?

2019-09-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 12:49 Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello, > > we are now able to build for armhfp and s390x architectures in Copr. > However, due to storage issues, we can enable only one of these > two right now. Which architecture would you prefer to have? > Support for armv7hl would be grea

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

2019-09-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 16:28 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 09. 19 15:58, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > To make things even worse there was a switch to python 3.8 on Rawhide > > which wasn't really prepared (pylint did not worked). > > I trust that your intentions were only the best when you wrote

Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307

2019-09-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 10:09 Leigh Scott wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 8:33 PM Ty Young wrote: > > Fedora and other distributions have been working on rootless Xorg > > since 2013. We've had it in place since at least 2015. This change was > > made way back in Fedora 24. > > > > Do you mean

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

2019-09-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > them anymore. > So, we're looking for someone t

Re: Orphaned a number of Eclipse pacakges

2019-09-23 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23. 09. 19 15:34, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > As eclipse module is the supported way to get eclipse now... > > So why do we keep everything around in Fedora and crate this duality? Looking at koschei [0], eclipse packages are going to

Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10

2019-09-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Hi Vit, > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a): > >> These srpm's require asciidoctor or rubygems-asciidoctor: > >> > >> awesome > >> booth > >> hugo > >> ipmctl > >> js8call > >>

Re: Join the package collection maintainers: Visit src.fp.o to request rights?

2019-09-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I was recently contacted by a fellow Fedora contributor about this. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers says: > > > If the push fails with this kind of message: > > > > W access for why DENIED to YOUR

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:32 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, Alright. I don't often reply to discussion threads like this, but here we go. > At Flock, a few of us met to discuss a future vision of the packager workflow. > This discussion was triggered by the realization t

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:47 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Instead I prefer a clone of the master upstream git repo and maintain a > > branch with patches cherry-picked into it. This is used to auto-generate > > pa

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:57 PM Jeremy Cline wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:49:31PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:47 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Daniel

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

2019-09-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean > > that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java > > module too. > > I think that banning module-only packages w

Re: Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

2019-09-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 3:48 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has > > almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module > > branches, except a handful of packages

Orphaned pegdown (leaf package)

2019-09-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I have just orphaned the "pegdown" package, which has become a leaf package in rawhide. Its only dependent packages in fedora were maven-doxia and maven-doxia-sitetools, but the latest builds in rawhide have disabled the markdown support in these packages, and their latest upstream

Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "libfixposix" package. It used to be a dependency of one of my other packages, but it is no longer required. No more fedora packages depend on it. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "paper-icon-theme" package. I no longer use it and have no interest in maintaining it further. The package is up-to-date with the latest upstream release (though the upstream project is pretty much dead now). Fabio _

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedorapro

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 15:51 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion):

Re: peek package

2020-01-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020, 12:15 Artem Tim wrote: > No prob. :) But i didn't received any notification so this could be > upsetting a little bit if package was retired. Community barely fixed crash > dump recently [1] and Fedora users before often write me on email with > various questions, so this mak

Re: Fedora Account Data Update mufti11

2020-01-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:08 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried: > > $ fedpkg clone wdune > Cloning into 'wdune'... > muft...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > and

Re: lv2-sorcer is not installable

2020-01-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 19:25 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a year > > ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2]. > > Isn't it great when the policy designed to remove > breakage from the distribution actually CR

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

2020-01-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:31 PM Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 07/01/2020 12:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 07. 01. 20 v 12:41 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > >> The thing is that no matter how much you can manage to automate the > >> creation of spec files for a given ecosystem, and I've never seen one > >>

Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing > > with tox is automated in packaging macros, %check has to be specified > > manually since upstre

Orphaned Java leaf packages

2020-01-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've orphaned 5 packages that were previously maintained by the Stewardship SIG, but which are now no longer required by any fedora package: - jboss-transaction-1.2-api - jettison - jetty-artifact-remote-resources - jetty-assembly-descriptors - jetty-test-policy It should be safe t

Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020

2020-01-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > I want to sum up what happened in Copr during 2019. At the end of this email, > you can see our TODO list and cast your > vote on what we should focus on. Hi! Thanks for all this work, COPR is super useful. > During the year 2019: > > *

Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020

2020-01-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 12:19 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 08. 01. 20 v 11:15 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > How do I actually enable this? I can't find it, neither in the web > > interface, nor in copr-cli. > > It would be useful to have this set up for my elementary-nig

Re: New Package Process

2020-01-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:26 PM Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a new contributor who wants to get > a package into Fedora. > > The package is called "Flight Data Recorder" >https://github.com/oracle/fdr > > It manages ftraces to record kernel data in way, when > there is a kern

Re: Lagging system with latest kernels

2020-01-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le 2020-01-09 15:02, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : > > > I have seen something like this happen in the past. I think it was > > around Fedora 18? kernel time frame.. on certain Lenovo T440? if you > > did a dd to a usb key, keybo

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 17:37 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken > about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further. > > Do we want to drop release and changelog from our spec f

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 6:52 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 10. 01. 20 v 18:33 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 17:37 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> This is not a new idea, it has been presented at floc

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 6:36 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le vendredi 10 janvier 2020 à 17:36 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit : > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and > > spoken > > about on this very list this fall, so

Re: Using pantheon as a standalone de

2020-01-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:24 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote: > > > Hello Harsh, > > Turned out you're right, Pantheon is written from scratch as it is explained > in this link: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pantheon > No, your information wasn't wrong, I was confused. Sorry about that. Hi, so

Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative

2020-01-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:47 PM Sarah Finn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I hope you are all well. > > I would like to invite you to contribute to our new initiative: AAA > replacement login. Hi! Uhm, I have two (or three) simple questions ... - What does AAA stand for? (Or am I supposed to know that

Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative

2020-01-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 05:51 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:51:35AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> > > On Jan 16, 2020, at 3:48 AM, Sarah Finn wrote: >> > > >> > >  >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I hope you are all

Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish

2020-01-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 was released upstream about a week ago > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673688). I'm intending > to build OCaml packages into a side tag starting today, and then > if it seems to work well integrate it

Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish

2020-01-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 10:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > > > > OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 was released up

Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2

2020-01-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all. > > Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only. > My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time, > Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving > up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting

Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2

2020-01-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 20:51 Antonio Trande wrote: > > > On 19/01/20 19:51, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all. > >> > >> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only. > >&g

Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...

2020-01-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:35 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, Hi Miro, > we try to rebuild all Python packages against Python 3.9 and report the > failures. I've seen several similar failures in a row now that can be > reproduced > in Fedora rawhide with the new gcc version. > > ld errors on m

Re: Copr in 2020 - summary of votes

2020-01-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: (snip) > On 21. 01. 20 14:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> max successful builds option > > This is already available. See previous thread. It is in chroot setting. > > AFAIK This is not available. max builds is, but not max successful builds. Se

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:40 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > Hey Everyone, > > On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a > recent blog post which you may be impacted by: > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/ > > We will be seeking input and r

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:30 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 17:17 Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:40 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: >> > >> > Hey Everyone, >> > >> > On behalf of the CPE team I w

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-01-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:02 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 20:02 Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:30 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 17:17 Fabio Valenti

Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...

2020-01-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:12 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html#common > > > > "Default to -fno-common > > > > A common mistake in C is omitting extern when declaring a global variable > > in a header file. If the header is included by se

Re: gcc 10: Default to -fno-common, multiple definitions of ...

2020-01-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:58 PM Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:31 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 14:54, Christoph Junghans wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> >> >> >> jtaylornetsniff-ng ocaml-l

Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0

2020-01-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, libbotan-2.so bumped its soname from libbotan-2.so.12 to libbotan-2.so.13 with yesterday's update to 2.13.0. This was not announced, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. At least the following three packages need a rebuild and are now broken in rawhide: - corectrl - daggy - qown

Unannounced soname bump with samba 4.12~rc1

2020-01-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Yesterday's samba update bumped the soname of a library included in samba-client-libs, from libndr.so.0 to libndr.so.1. This was not announced, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. This affects at least the following packages, which need rebuilds: - evolution-mapi - freeipa(-ser

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

2020-01-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:24 AM Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: > > > As has been discussed time and time again on this mailing list, the last > > member of the Java SIG left it at the end of 2018, leaving the group emptIy. > I'd be willing to work on that if I can figure out how to recreate th

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

2020-01-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: Hi again, I have a bit more time today, so I can respond to your more of your arguments directly. > I'm trying to find out what's going on with Java in Fedora. Fedora 31 was > released with a broken Eclipse. I subscribe to the ja

Re: Unannounced soname bump with botan2-2.13.0

2020-01-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:17 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > libbotan-2.so bumped its soname from libbotan-2.so.12 to > > libbotan-2.so.13 with yesterday's update to 2.13

Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local

2020-01-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 06:04 Bill Chatfield via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help > understanding what's going on. Groovy is failing to build because it > depends on gradle-local which doesn't exist. But gradle-

Re: Groovy Build Failing Due to Disappearance of groovy-local

2020-01-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:52 PM Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: > > > > On Monday, January 27, 2020, 3:58:07 AM EST, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > Depending on what you want to achieve, I think I can give you better "first > > package to work on" sugges

Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

2020-01-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:01 PM Mario Torre wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > > > You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems > > > of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be any > > > different? > > > > Honestly? I tot

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

2020-01-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > > Fedora 32 today. We are

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

2020-01-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500 > Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > Dan and Artur, > > > > The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC > > 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild. > > > > If the work is not done by then, we

Re: Java Checkstyle Blocked Even Though Build was Successful

2020-01-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 05:08 Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: > > > Are any of you on the java-devel list so that I could move my newb > questions > > there? I can guarantee that it's a low-traffic list so there's no risk in > > joining it. :-) > > > >

Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)

2020-01-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 05:44 Jerry James wrote: > Greetings, > > The antlr4 package needs a reboot so that it can ship the various > language runtime libraries, and so that it can be updated to the > latest version. I have been in contact with the maintainers of the > current antlr4 package and h

Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL

2020-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 10:13 Michael Schwendt wrote: > I don't do EPEL packaging. I never signed up as an "owner" of EPEL > packages. > I don't want to be the new default owner of EPEL bugzilla tickets. > Where may I be able to stop this mess? > Until this functionality is merged into pagure's di

Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL

2020-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:46 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Until this functionality is merged into pagure's dist-git plugin, there is > > a way, but it's a bit convoluted. > > > > You can set an override for Fedora / EPEL default

Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL

2020-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:26 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:44:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Until this functionality is merged into pagure's dist-git plugin, there is > > > a way, but it's

Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL

2020-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 00:43 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:57:03 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Did you at least check if the packages were used by something else? ... > > No, and that doesn't interest me at all. I am not doing EPEL packagi

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)

2020-01-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting on Monday, February 03 2020 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-02-03 15:00 UTC' Links

Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)

2020-01-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, With more responsibilities (FPC, Stewardship SIG, FESCo) and the ever-growing number of packages I maintain, I don't have as much time for the things I originally started my contributions to fedora with - the Pantheon desktop and the accompanying elementary applications. What makes

Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs

2020-01-31 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've noticed these a few times now, and I have *no idea* where this is coming from, for example: dnf --releasever=rawhide --repo rawhide --repo rawhide-source repoquery --source --requires python-pytest-harvest lists: directory pyproject-rpm-macros python3-devel python3dist(decopa

Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer

2020-02-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:59 AM Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > Hello all! > > I'm Erich, the current project leader of Ubuntu Studio, the > creativity-oriented flavor of Ubuntu. I've been leading that project for the > past two years. Hi Erich! > In that time, my team and I have taken Ubuntu Studi

Re: Strange "directory removed" dependencies in some RPMs

2020-02-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 8:43 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 02. 20 8:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 02. 20 0:31, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> I've noticed these a few times now, and I have *no idea* where this is

Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation

2020-02-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:06 PM Chris wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just curious if there as a way to dial back the Upstream Release > Monitoring and the automatic Bugzilla ticket generation from it? > > I pushed a new release of my software to PyPi and I swear before I even got > access to the shell

Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation

2020-02-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
org page for your package should be enough. Fabio > > Chris > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:11 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:06 PM Chris wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was just curious if there as a way to dial

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-03)

2020-02-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCo (2020-02-03) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 15:06:32 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-02-03/fesco.2020-02-03-15.06.log.html . Meetin

Re: Orphaning hibernate

2020-02-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 3:41 PM Bill Chatfield via devel wrote: > > I would like to take it, but I am not sponsored yet and I am still trying to > learn how to build packages. I'm getting close but there is a lot to learn. I > can see that it is currently not building because of missing dependenc

Re: GCC 10 how disable redefinition of thing error ?

2020-02-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020, 02:38 Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > Packages gpm, VirtualBox and webalizer have the building problem as > described for gpm in [1] , but VirtualBox have thousands of lines with > this error , I'd like disable this check on VirtualBox until VirtualBox > fix it , > the author of

Re: Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans

2020-02-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mario Torre wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote: > > > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already > > > plan to maintain it or can I take it over? (snip

Re: Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans

2020-02-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM Mario Torre wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:41 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora. > > > > > > When I read this I'm always puzzled by the negativit

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

2020-02-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 12:47 David Sommerseth wrote: > On 06/02/2020 09:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) > >> > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator > > > > To clarify: It was retired recently

Re: satyr soname bump

2020-02-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:25 AM Ernestas Kulik wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 07:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > What does it mean "us? I see that ABRT has broken dependencies in > > rawhide. I would appreciate if you could use side tag to build new > > version + rebuild all packages which dep

Re: What to do with simple-koji-ci?

2020-02-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:31 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to > every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the > package > with the proposed changes merged, and report th

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 10:30:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care > > > about > > > Java as much

Re: Invalid body, keys: sls missing

2020-02-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 7:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Jerry James wrote: > > > > I'm trying to get an f32 branch for a newly created package. Branch > > creation has failed twice now with the error in $SUBJECT: > > > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests

Unannounced SONAME bump in (lib)symmetrica

2020-02-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The last rawhide update for symmetrica bumped an SONAME from "libsymmetrica.so.0()(64bit)" to "libsymmetrica.so.2()(64bit)". At least one package is impacted and needs to be rebuilt (sagemath). Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell > > wrote: > > > > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned > > > > after 4 > > > > reminders (after

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:29 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy > > > wrote: >

What's up with koschei?

2020-02-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've noticed that koschei doesn't seem to have scheduled any scratch builds since around the fedora 32 mass rebuild, and it also hasn't picked up the f32 branch yet. Is there a known "outage" or is it just sitting there idle for some reason? I really like to know when my packages st

Re: What's up with koschei?

2020-02-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:12 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:27 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I've noticed that koschei doesn't seem to have scheduled any scratch > > builds since around the fedora 32 mass rebuild, and it also hasn't

Re: Bodhi weirdness

2020-02-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > This isn't the first time that this has happened but I have pushed multiple > builds in one bodhi update through the web interface and: > > 1. It takes forever > 2. Only one (or some) updates are created, others are dropped > > What gives? I

Orphaned netty (outdated + open security issues)

2020-02-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The Stewardship SIG has decided to orphan netty. None of our packages still depend on it. We were also unable to update the package to newer versions, and the currently available version has some open security issues associated with it: - CVE-2019-20444: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Qt, GNOME, and fonts

2020-02-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:09 AM Jerry James wrote: > > I am trying to track down a font problem with MuseScore: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790829 > > The problem is that everything is displayed in Cantarell, no matter > which font the user actually selects. In the style men

Unannounced / hidden SONAME bump in telepathy-qt (f32+f33)

2020-02-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The recent update from telepathy-qt 0.9.7 to 0.9.8 did not change the file name of one of the included shared libraries, but an SONAME and the associated automatically generated Provide of the RPM package changed: from libtelepathy-qt5-service.so.0()(64bit) to libtelepathy-qt5-servi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >