On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mat Booth <mat.bo...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Directly dependent packages of jboss-jstl-1.2-api: >> - jboss-jsf-2.1-api >> - jboss-jsf-2.2-api
Hi Mat! > IMO, you should just retire the jboss/wildfly stack right now. It has not > been maintained for years already: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SD26DWKQRKF4PIW656NKSRZXBJUP2PI4/ Oof. I didn't know that it has been basically unmaintained for so long ... This post predates even my becoming a "packager" in fedora :/ Concerning JBoss / wildfly: We'll eventually get rid of most JBoss / wildfly packages anyway. However, the team responsible for dogtag-pki still needs some jboss packages as dependencies, so we can't just retire everything. This is why we decided on the current procedure - only try to find maintainers for packages the stewardship-sig and the dogtag-pki stack don't depend on, and orphan / retire unnecessary packages "layer by layer". The end result should be about the same, but this way maintainers of dependent packages have more time to adapt and / or react to changes, and the changes themselves are smaller. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
