What's the State of the Java SIG?

Hi everybody, You're probably aware that the Stewardship SIG has been picking up some (±230) Java packages to keep them from getting removed from fedora, and to try to keep them maintained. Since the fraction of out-of-date packages has fallen from 70% to 30% (with 0 FTBFS issues left), I think we

Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:33 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:17 PM John M. Harris Jr > wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 18, 2019 3:42:20 AM MST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > IMHO effort spent on maintenance of most of these ursine Java packages > > > is mostly wasted

Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:12 PM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, Fabio, > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:30 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> You're probably aware that the Stewardship SIG has been picking up >> some (±230) Java

Re: Not shipping 3 types of bytecode in python3-libs?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 19. 11. 19 20:20, Adam Jackson wrote: > > In the spirit of positivity and collaboration, I spent a few minutes > > looking at the results given to try to find some easy wins. Here's what > > I found: > > > > python3-libs ships multiple cop

Re: Not shipping 3 types of bytecode in python3-libs?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 22:30 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 19. 11. 19 21:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:32 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > >> > >> On 19. 11. 19 20:20, Adam Jackson wrote: > >>> In the spirit of positivity and collaborati

Is the MBS (Module Build Service ?) alright?

Hi everybody, I've been noticing irregular, weird surges in koji activity for the past few weeks, and today, another one happened. Within 2 hours (8AM and 10AM UTC), MBS submitted ±350 builds to koji (of which almost half failed), drowning out any other build activity: koji list-builds --after=20

Re: Is the MBS (Module Build Service ?) alright?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:10 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:43 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I've been noticing irregular, weird surges in koji activity for the > > past few weeks, and today, another one happened. Within 2 hours (8AM > >

Re: Orphaned hamcrest

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 17:57 Miro Hrončok wrote: > I have just orphaned hamcrest, based on the wishes of the maintainer. > > If you want it, open a releng ticket: > > > https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unorphan&title=Unorphan%20hamcrest For the record: if nobody claims this pa

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:32 AM Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > > Il giorno lun 25 nov 2019 alle ore 10:54 Miro Hrončok > ha scritto: >> >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure >> that the

Unannounced SONAME bump in libusbmuxd

FYI, commit [0] introduced a major update for libusbmuxd to rawhide (including an unannounced SONAME bump), and even explicitly changed the %files entry for the shared library against the Packaging Guidelines' recommendations to cover the library version with a glob. *frown* Please coordinate rebu

Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

Hi everybody, I'm a bit concerned about the growing number of broken dependencies in fedora, which leads to non-installable (FTI) and un-buildable (FTBFS) packages. For rawhide [0], I see almost 400 source packages and almost 200 x86_64 packages with broken deps. Especially the number of source pa

Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

r now, and checking FTBFS issues is already covered elsewhere. So for now, I'm only checking for missing/broken dependencies. Fabio > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:23 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I'm a bit concerned about the growing numbe

Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:14 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > PS: Feel free to browse the data in the linked pagure repo. I'm > > regenerating it daily with the latest state of all fedora branches. If > > some

Re: bugs for non-EOL releases are being closed as EOL by a script

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:27 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 15:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713#c13 > > Not only reviews: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777310 > https://bugzilla.re

Re: PSA: please stop manually titling Bodhi updates

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 09:53 Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:33:04AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > > Since the new Bodhi UI rolled out recently I've noticed a big uptick in > > updates where the update creator manually set the update title. > > > > This is a prob

Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

t caused by a DNF / repoclosure bug. Fabio > Do you want to check for FTI/FTBFS or that all dependencies are > present in Fedora? > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:23 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I'm a bit concerned about the growing

Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

e(git2) >= 0.9.0 with crate(git2) < 0.10.0) is unsatisfiable since the rust-git2-devel package in rawhide has version 0.10.1 (and hence doesn't satisfy the second requirement). Fabio > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 17:33 Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:08

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:40 AM Felix Schwarz wrote: Hi Felix! > Am 29.11.19 um 11:18 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > My effort is to raise the awareness about he failure. Despite my large > > effort, > > I cannot possibly fix all the build failures in Fedora. > > I just wanted to mention that I app

Re: Major rewrite of project

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 11:45 Tomas Korbar wrote: > Hi, > I would like to ask you a question. If upstream of your package does major > rewrite of it, then what is the proper process to rebase such package? I'm > maintainer of cheat [0] which has been rewritten in go. I suppose i need a > new package

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request > > new branches on that repo? > > * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request? > > Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my package

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at> > wrote: > > > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > >

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:08 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Hi, > > Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please? > I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes. > > https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec > https://leigh123linux.fedorapeop

Re: Unorphan eclipse-avr

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:25 AM Tilmann Bubeck wrote: > > Hi > > I am willing to adopt eclipse-avr as a new maintainer. It was orphaned, > because it did not build properly, because the dependent packages > ("eclipse", ...) have been moved to a module. > > I already contacted Mat Booth who maintai

Re: Unorphan instructions

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:40 PM Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > > On 12/4/19 12:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 12. 19 11:28, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> Doesn't the new "Take" button at > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-avr work, s

Unannounced library bump: thrift 0.10.0 -> 0.13.0

Hi everybody, The "thrift" package was updated in rawhide and changed the name of its library (which is oddly versioned anyway, and the "main" package ships *.so files ???) At least gnuradio needs to be rebuilt for the new version (if it supports the new library version? it's not a simple SONAME

Re: (thinking about) unretiring xmlbeans

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:52 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > xmlbeans [1,2] got retired because of lack of maitainers. > It's used by diffoscope now, so I'm thinking about adopting it. > Any major reasons not to? Fedora was at 2.6.0, upstream is now at > 3.1.0, so it'd be definitely some

Re: Unannounced library bump: thrift 0.10.0 -> 0.13.0

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 4:50 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 12/4/19 3:44 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > The "thrift" package was updated in rawhide and changed the name of > > its library (which is oddly versioned anyway, and

Re: Bohdi / Create New Update - I miss the field Builds

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Martin Gansser wrote: > > I mean this field [1] > > [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/bohdi/bohdi.png The "builds" field has been moved to the top of the page again (thanks, bodhi maintainers!). If it doesn't show up for you, maybe a hard refresh of

Re: Bohdi / Create New Update - I miss the field Builds

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 5:53 PM Martin Gansser wrote: > > ok, i see, they have moved the builds field to the top. > sorry for the yelp. Can I suggest that you also not fill the "Name" field with just the name of the updated package? Even the automatically generated default value if you leave it em

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 07:35 Johannes Lips wrote: > Hi all, > > I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between > texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so > much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not > reflected o

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 08:46 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 06/12/19 07:34, Johannes Lips ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between > texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, onl

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto: > >> "Johannes Lips" >> > >> > >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not > >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushe

Re: Library missing for pantheon desktop

On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:33 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote: > > when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing > > nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by > > wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64 > > according

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote: > > ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it: > > > > run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*``` > > if you get a result that looks like > > `

Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:40 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Builds will start soon into a side tag (f32-build-side-14856), and > then if everything goes OK I will merge it into Rawhide. > > This version should have fixed RISC-V support which is broken > currently (and requires some extremely di

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:53 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:22 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10. 12. 19 4:33, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 18:03 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 06. 12. 19 1:46, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 16:39 Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > Il giorno mar 10 dic 2019 alle ore 16:29 Miro Hrončok > ha scritto: > >> On 10. 12. 19 16:27, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> > sbonazzo: buildnumber-maven-plugin >> > >> > >> > Not sure how I got listed there, but I'm not the previous mai

HEADS-UP: poetry 1.0.0 now available in rawhide

Hi everybody, I've been tracking beta releases of poetry for a while now, and a few hours ago, 1.0.0 was finally released to GitHub [0] and pypi [1]. I've made packages of beta releases available on COPR [2] for some time, and I am not aware of any issues with the 1.0.0 release (rather, it fixes

Re: HEADS-UP: poetry 1.0.0 now available in rawhide

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've been tracking beta releases of poetry for a while now, and a few > > hours ago, 1.0.0 was finally released to G

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard mockups

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 4:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello devel, Hey Miro! > I got nerdslipped and I ahve created some HTML only mockup of a thing that I > find very useful. A Fedora Packager Dashboard. > > You can find the early mockup at: > > https://hroncok.cz/packager-dashboard-mockup/ >

Re: koji builder status

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. Hi Kevin, > I just thought I would share a short status update on koji builders with > everyone. As many of you know, we like to keep the Fedora koji builders > on the current most recent stable Fedora release. This is to make sur

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019, 14:44 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: (snip) Hello. > > Fmt 6.1.2 build completed for Rawhide. It include SOVERSION bump. All > dependent packages need to be rebuilded. It would be great to announce this stuff a week in advance, so maintain

Re: Bug filing/triage/ownership policy for modules

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019, 14:29 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ke, 18 joulu 2019, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Also, it is interesting that AFAIK, we have not yet dealt with issue > >> like this (i.e. reporting issues against specific streams) for RHEL8 > yet. > > > >How can Modulari

Re: Removing a commit

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all. > > Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch? > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7be939108c2b1deff3f105bfdbc?branch=epel7 > > (I wish top return to the 3.11.0 release of petsc4py

Re: Removing a commit

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:30 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all. > >> > >> Please, can you help me to re

Re: Removing a commit

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:44 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > > > On 21/12/19 21:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:30 PM Antonio Trande > > wrote: > >> > >> On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> On Sat

Re: Build complete, but result generic error

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019, 11:27 Guido Aulisi wrote: > Il giorno lun 23 dic 2019 alle ore 09:24 Guido Aulisi > ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > Koji reports that build [0] is complete, but it is marked with this > error: > > GenericError: cannot update build 1424540, state: COMPLETE > > > > It's not selec

Re: How to reuild wdune ?

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019, 16:16 J. Scheurich wrote: > Hi, > > I tried the following: > > $ kinit muft...@fedoraproject.org > rm -rf wdune > fedpkg clone wdune > cd wdune > $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-1.654-3.fc32.src.rpm > /dev/null > > $ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1658153)" > You d

Re: How to reuild wdune ?

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019, 17:45 J. Scheurich wrote: > > I tried the following: >> >> $ kinit muft...@fedoraproject.org >> rm -rf wdune >> fedpkg clone wdune >> cd wdune >> $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-1.654-3.fc32.src.rpm > /dev/null >> >> $ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1658153)" >> > >

Re: How do I add bohdi revelant tag?

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019, 09:51 Barry Scott wrote: > I wish to push pycxx for epel7 how do I add a the epel7 tags? > > The following comment has been added to the python-pycxx-7.1.3-5.el7 > update: > > bodhi - 2019-12-24 07:04:49.655106 (karma: 0) > FEDORA-EPEL-2019-476f0d3c08 ejected from the push b

Re: Final fedora distribution Was: How to reuild wdune ?

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 11:43 AM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > $ fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31 > Could not execute request_branch: Missing a Pagure token. Refer to > "fedpkg request-repo -h" to set atoken in your user configuration. > $ fedpkg request-repo wdune > Could not execute requ

fedora infrastructure issues: don't panic, it's not your fault

Hi all, There have been some reports that multiple fedora services are currently not working. It might be a good idea to post this to devel as a new thread to make sure more people see it and don't start panicking because their builds are failing or bodhi sends them cryptic error messages. - This

Re: Issue with sysusage build and bodhi

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 4:27 AM Frank Crawford wrote: > > Folks, > > I did a new build to add sysusage to EPEL8 the other day, and pushed it to > bodhi, and today received the following message: > > bodhi - 2019-12-27 20:13:12.706366 (karma: 0) > FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e249fc2a74 ejected from the push

Re: No rich dependencies allowed for this type on *.desktop files

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:29 PM John Florian wrote: > > I think I found a bug and am hoping someone here can point me in the > right direction as to where to report it. I think this is rpmbuild, but > am not certain. > > Anyway, I have a private package that generates a bunch of desktop files > f

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 7/15/19 11:34 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello, Dridi Boukelmoune. > > > > Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:26:59 + you wrote: > > > >> Emulate as in not run natively even though the hardware might be able to? > > > > Sorry for misinfor

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 07. 19 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API > >>> remains

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 19:33 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/15/19 5:43 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > (I for one am still semi-regularly building stuff in the mock > > fedora-rawhide-i686 chroots, especially for testing if things still > > work on 32bit systems (be it armv7h

Re: Updating wcslib in Rawhide to 6.3

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:38 PM Sergio Pascual wrote: > > Hello, I'm going to update wcslib from 5.19 to 6.3. It breaks API, so I'm > announcing it here in advance. > > The policy [1] says that I should notify also the maintainers of the packages > that depend on mine. What command I have to ru

Re: google-oauth-java-client / javapackages-tools (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (75 to be retired))

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:33 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:47:10AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See this report online at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-07-22.txt > > Since the majority of new failures (394!) are caused by the orphaning > of

Re: Discussion around app retirements and categorizations by the CPE team

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 7/22/19 1:22 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 07. 19 20:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Good Morning, > >> > >> We posted this [1] blog today and want to open a mailing thread to garner > >> feedback, field questions and get some thoug

Non-responsive maintainer: tonet666p

Hi everybody, Does anybody know how to contact tonet666p? One of his packageshas been broken for a while, and he doesn't respond on bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480028 If there's no positive response within the next week, I'll open a fesco ticket in accordance with the

Re: mass rebuild, glusterfs build failed

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > hmmm. from the root.log > > > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provid

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:25 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live. > You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/F31 > > Many many thanks to all the peop

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:16 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > -- > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > > a new koji tag (which will be the default target

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:47 PM Dave Dykstra wrote: > > Alex, > > Thanks for the quick response. I see that one of my packages > (singularity) has BuildRequires git. However, installing git on fc31 > does not install jgit. Maybe jgit is a BuildRequires of git, but it's > not clear to me that i

Re: Authentication in fedpkg

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:00 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > I recently added two new packages to Fedora. Things have changed a bit > since the previous time I did this, and more things can now be done > through fedpkg. I would like to share my experience with this. This is > what the procedure is lik

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 22:42 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/31/19 9:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:06:17PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 31/07/2019 16:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> > >>> My canary ran took 24 minutes, apparently the CI pipeline was slower > than

Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 31.07.19 20:52, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) > wrote: > > > Instead, as Lennart explained, systemd has no strong release > > discipline. systemd didn't provide anyone a fixed version (requiring > > fishin

Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:33 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:36 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 14:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > > > On Do, 01.08.19 10:14, Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) wrote: > &g

Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:39 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 11:33 Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:36 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: >> > Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 14:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit : >> > > On

Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 20:19 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:16:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hmm. I never really chipped into the ~ discussion, but it just occurred > > to me it intersects with a discussion I care quite a lot about: RPM > > version comparison. Especiall

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:07 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > In the extended version: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-08-05.txt > > I see that javapackages-tools is still on the list (because it depends on > > gradle) >

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:17 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: > > > eclipse-pydev > > > unused build dep > >

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

6 MiB > Size change: 54.93 KiB > Changelog: > * Sat Aug 03 2019 Lukas Vrabec - 20190801-1 > - update to 20190801 > > > Package: recoll-1.25.20-1.fc31 > Old package: recoll-1.25.16-2.fc31 > Summary: Desktop full text search tool with Qt GUI > RPMs: re

gettext retired, rawhide broken

Can somebody please unretire and fix gettext? It was just automatically retired because it didn't build successfully since fedora 29. And now the world is broken. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[HEADS-UP] gradle will go away

Hi everybody! After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora. - the current version packaged in fedora is outdated (4.4.1, from Dec. 2017, vs. 5.5.1 from July 2019) - it currently doesn't build itself (not even in bootstrap mode)

Some NodeJS packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some NodeJS packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a package

Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

Hello packagers, The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on them anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them, preferably someone who actively uses these packages or maintains a package t

Re: [HEADS-UP] gradle will go away

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 13:48 Mat Booth wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:24, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we > > cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora. &g

Re: findbugs-contrib building on i686 builders despite ExcludeArch

On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 11:33 Richard Fearn wrote: > Thanks, Jason and Vit, for your replies. Unfortunately it looks like > many of findbugs-contrib's Java dependencies are being retired at the > moment, so I need to decide what to do about that first... > Let me suggest joining the Java SIG (if y

Re: Cannot build with mock for rawhide on Fedora 30

On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:08 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > The same happens in Copr. > > Iñaki > > El sáb., 17 ago. 2019 12:53, Till Hofmann > escribió: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm facing an issue with the package signatures on Fedora when trying to >> build in rawhide chroot: >> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under > the "Merge" button. > > Am I the only one impacted? > > Is that deliberate or some bug worth reporting? FWIW, the "Merge" button from the "merge popup" is also

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

#x27;s annoying that the UI is broken. Fabio 19/8/20 11:26(e)an, Fabio Valentini igorleak idatzi zuen: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under > the "Merge

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019, 19:31 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.8, we are running a coordinated > rebuild in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8 > > > > If you see a "Rebuild for Python 3.8

Re: nothing provides pkgconfig(egl) needed by qt5-qtbase-devel

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019, 21:13 Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Scott Talbert wrote: > > >> I'm hit by the above error in rawhide. > >> > >> Is this expected or unexpected failure? > > > > I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744292 > > > > But it may be expected? > >

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 15:19 Honza Horak wrote: > Cassandra has been originally packaged by folks in our team, in the time > we had some stakes there. Since then, priorities changed and also people > involved are not in our team any more. We tried to keep it packaged in > Fedora with reasonable ef

Re: Error with fedpkg update

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:18 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > I've been trying to submit an update to testing for several days now and it > keeps failing > with the following message: > > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find > release associated with build: copyq-3

[Help needed] Packaging sassc ruby gem for jekyll 4.0.0

Hi everybody, With the recent, major new release of Jekyll (4.0.0) and its SASS converter (2.0.0), it migrated from the deprecated, plain ruby "sass" gem to "sassc", which is a wrapper around the libsass C++ library. I've never had to deal with this scenario for my other ruby packages, and I just

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 17:07 Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.8, we are running a coordinated >> rebuild in a >> > side tag. >> > >> >> The side tag was merged. Bui

Re: Error with fedpkg update

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:58 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:49 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> >> > >> > bodhi is not yet enabled for fedora 31. >> > >> > According to the schedule, that's supposed to happen on 2019-08-29: >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases

[HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

Hi everybody, Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR rebasing it to the latest version (1.25, released this month) into master / rawhide and f31. The new versions include *a lot of bug fixes*, an

Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event > where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open source > projects (or at least ones hosted on GitHub). It occurs to me that we > could have a post on the Communit

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:08 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > them anymore. > So, we're looking for someone t

Re: Non-responsive maintainer

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings wrote: > > The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does > anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603 It's not only out of date, but also

Re: [HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > Hi everybody, > > > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than > > three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We pla

Re: [HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in f

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: (snip) > stewardship-sig: logback, gpars, groovy, gmavenplus-plugin I submitted a new build for maven yesterday which removes its dependency on logback, which in turn also means we no longer depend on gpars, groovy, or gmavenplus-plugin. Whic

Re: Sponsorship request

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's > orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) > > I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the > FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 09. 19 21:38, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > So did I miss some announcement that Modularity is RIP and nobody > > should use it or just nobody cares about it and I should find more > > reliable way to deliver Rust apps? > > As a bit off topi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >