On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >    On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at>
> wrote:
> >
> >      Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >      > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to
> request
> >      > new branches on that repo?
> >      > * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request?
> >
> >      Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my packages on
> EPEL, I
> >      am
> >      fine with anybody requesting EPEL branches for them as long as they
> do
> >      the
> >      work and don't expect me to do anything to those branches (which is
> not
> >      going to happen).
> >
> >    I think this might be a good time point out that it's actually
> possible to
> >    override the default assignee for a component for EPEL bugs (also for
> >    fedora) in bugzilla by adding this override in the
> >    releng/fedora-scm-requests repo for the respective package, like here:
> >    [2]
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/jackson-databind
> >    (Note that lef was actually deemed non-responsive some months back, so
> >    this is probably not a good example of a package where this split
> >    responsibility "worked".)
>
> Just a note on that subject, we're actively working on getting ride of
> this git
> repo and move this back to dist-git as well :)
>

Hi Pierre,

That's good to hear, the current workflow is a bit involved.

Do you plan to store this data in a file in each dist-git branch, or in a
file containing the whole information on a separate, non-buildable orphan
(semantic overload here ...) git branch? I think the latter would have the
benefit of not interfering with dist-git contents at all, while still being
stored in the same repo.

Fabio


> As for the issue discussed in this thread, this sounds like a fairly easy
> change
> to add to: https://pagure.io/fedscm-admin/.
> Could someone open a ticket there? (Do not allow non-maintainer to request
> a
> branch on a package)
> The workflow becoming: if you want an epel branch created, talk to the
> current
> maintainer, get them to give you commit on the package and then request the
> branch via fedpkg.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to