On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 08:46 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 06/12/19 07:34, Johannes Lips ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between > texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so > much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not > reflected on the rpm level. > > What I found weird is that you can't comment on an update, which is > already pushed to stable. A lot of users are only hit by a bug, once it > reaches stable and then you don't have any possibility to highlight a bug > report or an issue with this update. I would like to have the possibility > to add such an information to an update, which introduced the issue. > That was requested and discussed long time ago in > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2050 > > The rationale behind this was about the nonsense to have users > commenting on an already pushed update, since this cannot be undone. > > My opinion is that once an update is pushed to stable, new bugs should > be reported in Bugzilla, not as comments in Bodhi. However there's an > open discussion about restoring the previous behavior: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3748 > > > Also I would like to ask if it is possible for important updates, like > the texlive one to increase the stable karma. It really depends which > mirrors you are using and if you are unlucky the updates get pushed to > stable, before it reaches updates-testing for you and then again there's > nothing to add, once it's pushed. > > > The stable-karma and stable-days parameters can be set by the user in > the web form or by CLI. By default stable-karma is set to 3, but it can > be changed when creating the update. > Right. So should the default of -3/+3 be changed for "critpath" packages? They already need 14 days in testing, but they also get orders of magnitude more feedback, so raising the karma limits to -2/+6 or something like that sounds reasonable to me. On the other hand, I wouldn't even have any objections to changing the defaults to something like -2/+6 for all packages, since it wouldn't make any difference at all for the majority of packages that reach 7 days in testing without any feedback whatsoever. Fabio > Mattia > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
