On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos
wrote:
> On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad
> > mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25
e back to the Live desktop.
I do not get the same problem if I delete all the existing partitions on
the drive and install only Fedora. That proceeds fine. The problem only
seems to exist if I try to install alongside Windows.
My question is: how might I go about troubleshooting this?
--
C
kages.
So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
how to even begin tracking it down. I had thought it may have something to
do with the extra recovery partitions, but the partitioning screen in
Anaconda seemed to detect the existing partitions just fin
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
>> how to even begin tracking it down. ...
>>
>
> File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda
> as a separate text/plain attachment. The storage.
lease. As a developer and a user, I like the idea of those releases
labeled differently, so that individual packages can adopt those semantics
if it makes sense for them, independently. Basically, the name or release
"type" (not "LTS", but whatever label is appropriate), co
I just verified that I have the same default configuration from a clean
install. Not good at all. I expected more.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just happened to look at the firewalld default
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 01:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > To me, it is obvious that the Workstation WG is in deliberate contempt of
> > FESCo's decision. That alone ought to lead to sanctions from FESCo. In
> > addition, FESCo's decis
oud init scripts I frequently use '-y' and '--skip-broken' to install
or upgrade specific sets of packages, because these scripts run
non-interactively and I want to upgrade some things even when I can't
upgrade everything. In my normal workstation environment, I typ
andard 3rd-party repo for Fedora users.
Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger
wrote:
> I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party
>
packager to do in those situations, because that depends on
the user's configuration, right?
Thanks,
Christopher
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Christopher wrote:
>
>
> > Are there any guidelines for enforcing crypto policies in Java
> > applications.
> > Primarily, I was thinking about those Java applicatio
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 02:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dear Fedora developers,
> >
> > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> > minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> > dependencies, etc.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> > minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> > dependencies, etc.
>
> -1, all the serious software requires gcc, gcc-c++ and make
Does anybody know if AutoService (
https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged for
Fedora? Maybe under a different name?
Upstream Apache Accumulo is considering adding it as a build dependency.
(It's Apache 2.0 licensed).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravata
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Does anybody know if AutoService (
> > https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged
> for
> > Fedora? Maybe under a different name?
&
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Christopher
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> > Does anybody know if AutoService (
>> > https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/se
s, could you add a "Provides: " line to refer
to the other name?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I can take it.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to orphan the netty package in Fedora next week since I no
> longer using it. Please let me know if you are interested in
> maintaining it.
>
> Here is a list of packages that depend on netty (it's probably
Hi,
I'm trying to build the latest version of thrift, and am running into a
problem with one of the build tests, which has a dependency on boost-static
for "%{_libdir}/libboost_unit_test_framework.a"
I really have no expertise with PPC at all, and also very limited knowledge
of autotools, but it
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:26 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:10:32 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build the latest version of thrift, and am running into
> > a problem with one of the build tests, which has a depende
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
>
> On 14 March 2017 at 07:24, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> g++: error: /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a: No such file or
> directory
>
> the thrift buildsystem doesn't treat ppc64le as a 64-bit arch
> with /usr/lib64, probably there is a ha
There seem to be a lot of possible guidance on the Wiki for what I'm trying
to do, but no clear, unambiguous step-by-step path to follow. So, I'm
seeking advice here.
js-jquery provides jquery 2.x and js-jquery 2.x
js-jquery1 provides jquery 1.x and js-jquery1 1.x
I want to upgrade js-jquery to 3
I want to update js-jquery to jQuery 3 (it is currently 2). So, I'm going
to follow the rename procedure to rename js-jquery to js-jquery2.
Afterwards, instead of retiring js-jquery, I'll update it to version 3.
This ensure a proper upgrade path for packages which need version 2,
specifically.
For
The review request for the separate js-jquery2 package is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441399
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:32 PM Christopher
wrote:
> I want to update js-jquery to jQuery 3 (it is currently 2). So, I'm going
> to follow the rename procedure to renam
You can set the name of the file via the GitHub API when you download it.
For jQuery (packaged as js-jquery), I use:
https://github.com/jquery/jquery/archive/%{version}/jquery-%{version}.tar.gz
This will work for any GitHub project which tags released versions:
https://github.com///archive//.tar.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:47 PM Rafal Luzynski <
digitalfr...@lingonborough.com> wrote:
> 23.04.2017 19:23 Christopher wrote:
> >
> > You can set the name of the file via the GitHub API when you download
> it.
> >
> > For jQuery (packaged as js-jquery), I
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:21 AM Globe Trotter wrote:
>
> Ideally, of course, it appears that the best course would be to version
> the software in github itself. I have to figure out how to do this, and
> would appreciate any pointers in this regard. I only know very basic
> commands in git.
>
>
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a fairly large package that needs review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612
>
> and I've been offered a few review swaps for it, but the trouble is, I
> don't really feel well qualified to review package
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:04 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
> On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > <mailto:david.m...@firstworks.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a fairly l
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:36 PM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Christopher
> wrote:
> > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review
> process, and/or some of these step-by-step checklists yo
ted.html.en)
>
> which does not make wrong and *dangerous* behavior correct
>
> a *hidden* *user writeable* directory *in front* of PATH is
> plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if
+1
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
de
course, one can always check the contents of $PATH directly... but
there's some level of trust here... because that can get quite long,
and lazy users like me assume (perhaps badly) that if we didn't modify
it in our login scripts, it wasn't modified to include any additional
user-writable paths beyond ~/bin
And, the xdg argument doesn't seem like a sufficient argument for
me... we're talking about login scripts, not X. It is very unintuitive
that an xdg-related directory would be on the default path for a bash
login, if you're not even running X. This is a bash profile... not an
X profile...
The biggest problem isn't that it's hidden or that it's there by
default, or that it's writable by potentially bad-behaving software.
The biggest problem is simply that users don't know about it. I
certainly didn't.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ntinue to exploit.
Now, we could argue that ~/.local/bin is *just as* visible as ~/bin,
because they are both on the PATH, but please don't argue that because
attackers have choices, then all choices are equivalent. The former is
debatable (and can probably be measured with a simple user survey
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:38 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175
It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and for
other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the mismatch
between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like
gpg-agen
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:18 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:29:10AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:29:26 -0800
> > "Brian C. Lane" wrote:
> >
> > > I am opposed to this. If a tool wants/needs to
> > > use v2 it should be using gpg2 not gpg. gpg v1.4.x
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:09 PM John M. Harris, Jr.
wrote:
> Unless there are any issues with gpg, and to my knowledge there aren't, I
> can't see any important reason to default 'gpg' to 'gpg2', at least not for
> f24.
>
>
The biggest reason I can think is to make things consistent with the
out-
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:04 AM Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
> *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_for_EPEL
> *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging
> *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/599
>
>
T
I occasionally get notifications from Koschei about my packages failing to
build. When I look (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13071213), I see a
python stack trace which looks like it has nothing to do with my package's
build. Rather, it looks like Koschei itself failed. Usuall
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Good idea! Can you open a ticket on the koschei issue tracker about it?
> https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues
Done, and thanks: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/73
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://l
Hi, I sent a message to the users@ list[1] about XRDP, and didn't get a
response. I'm curious what's the status of XRDP in Fedora. I tried to get
it to work in the AWS cloud image for Fedora 23, and it didn't work (could
authenticate, but it couldn't start vnc/gnome, but couldn't figure out
why). I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM Timotheus Pokorra <
timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> please check [1] if your bug has been reported already.
> Or report new bugs at [2], and hopefully the maintainers (see list at
> [3]) should reply on th
What is the impact on openjdk crypto providers?
On Fri, May 20, 2016, 05:49 Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: NSS enforces the system-wide crypto
> policy =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSCryptoPolicies
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
>
> As it i
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:21 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Julien Enselme
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> > > (ccnet [1]) because one o
Is it possible to pass rpmbuild options like --noclean to `fedpkg local`?
If so, I can't seem to figure out how.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
What is the "Payload Hash" in koji?
It looks like an MD5, but of what? It's not the rpm... I've checked.
Should koji be providing verification hashes for manual downloads of built
RPMs? I think this would be useful for testing.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=8351409
_
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:46 AM Jan Synacek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Christopher
> wrote:
> > Is it possible to pass rpmbuild options like --noclean to `fedpkg
> local`? If
> > so, I can't seem to figure out how.
>
> AFAIK no, at least on F24. Fo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:59 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Christopher
> wrote:
> > :sadface: mock requires root password (not just sudo), and that's a
> > limitation for me sometimes.
>
> Have root run "usermod -a -G mock "
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 10:03 AM, Christopher wrote:
> > Oh nice! Thanks for that. I can run that with sudo (my admins don't
> > always give root password, but can get sudo).
> >
> If you can run "sudo -s", do yo
Where does pkgdb2 development occur? Searching online, and
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ itself points to
https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/
That page says there's a clone at
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2
But, based on what's at both locations, it seems like the Trac page is out
o
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:44 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 21 October 2016 at 14:25, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Why does Bugzilla allow filing private Fedora bugs?
> >
>
> Because people believe they are posting private information from their
> systems which they do not want to have broad d
With some of the stuff transitioning from fedorahosted Trac to pagure, and
with some of the wiki pages not being concise or up-to-date, can somebody
point me to the best current instructions to request a co-maintainer be
added? I have a colleague who's helping me update some of my packages, but
I'm
I should probably know the answers to these by now, but...
1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one
will get tagged, and when? Which one will Bodhi use when I create an update?
2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I roll it
over when I up
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno
wrote:
> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher"
> escribió:
> >
> > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but...
> >
> > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which on
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:36 AM William Moreno
wrote:
> El 22/10/2016 10:27 p. m., "Christopher"
> escribió:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno <
> williamjmore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/23/2016 04:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
> >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
> >> roll it
> >> over
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 05:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 10/21/2016 05:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:42:02 +0000
> >> Christopher wrote:
> >>
> >>> What is the "P
Can anybody help me build js-jquery1 for F24? I keep getting some NodeJS
and/or Grunt error with uglify, but only for the F24 branch. I want to
update the package, and I can get all the other branches to build just fine
(including EPEL7, F25, and rawhide), but F24 is broken even before I apply
any
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/11/16 01:02, Christopher wrote:
>
> > Can anybody help me build js-jquery1 for F24? I keep getting some NodeJS
> > and/or Grunt error with uglify, but only for the F24 branch. I want to
> > update the package, and
Try emailing him at his apache.org address (same user name).
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:59 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Hi, I have been trying to contact user ke4qqq (David Nalley) about
> sheepdog (which is years out of date and, anyway, segfaults out of the
> box). I opened https://bugzilla.redhat
out, though. I just know g-o-a seemed to work
better on F24.
> Michael
> _______
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
.@fedoraproject.org
(requires python-keyring and python-SecretStorage)
somewhere into your session-start scripts (but of course, this would require
> your password in plaintext somewhere).
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an
gotta grep/awk/bash my way through it?
--
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:31 PM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 20/12/16 22:28, Christopher wrote:
> > What's with the new sources format?
> > The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources`
> > Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so I
> cou
: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org
--
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org
--
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:03:56 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this
> > happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it
&
edoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
o
test... and possibly co-maintain, if the package maintenance were
sufficiently simple.
Thanks,
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
>
> Yes, they are:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#_no_external_kernel_m
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:13 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
> > to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
&
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > >
> > > &g
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned, probably
> > because it's kind of worthless if it's not signed. And, it's a lot of
&g
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:35 AM Momčilo Medić
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher <
> > > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wr
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> &
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 05:58, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > If I get the motivation, I'll file a bug against the RPMFusion package.
>
> Here's the bug tracker: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/
Thanks.
>
&g
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:31 AM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2020 10:14, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 14.04.2020 21:23, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> Enable systemd-resolved by default. glibc will perform name resolution
> >> using nss-resolve rather than nss-dns.
> >
> > I've teste
1 for the first time, awhile back, but I
figured it was harmless and would be fixed eventually. However, since
it has been happening for months on F31, and still is happening on F32
now that I've upgraded, I'm wondering if there's a good reason why
it's trying to do t
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:55 AM Christopher wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me why the grub package seems to want to label files
> > on the EFI partition during updates?
> > I had thought that, by definition, EFI parti
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello, as a Fedora user, who doesn't consume any modules, I'd like an easy way
> to disable modular repos to save some traffic (both for myself and on the
> mirrors).
>
> Disclaimer: I do not propose to change any defaults, just the delivery
Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that
people use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but the
reaction to that is, "improve the docs" and "works as intended". Am I the
only one who thinks that the people pushing modularity aren't listening to
the
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
> > Question (not for Fabio specifically, but for the list) modules can have
> > (Build)Requires on other modules
> > right?
>
> Yes, if the module maintainer is willing to expose their module in the
> BUILDROOT. That was PKI's problem: miz
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:07 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[SNIP]
> The issue is that no one has time to take ownership of these packages. The
> whole premise around Fedora's package model for the last 15 years is that the
> number of packagers and the number of packages linearly grew. You mig
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:10 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
[snip]
> The Java SIG is here:
>
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java
Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would
like to join.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
You're posting this on devel@, I wonder if you'd get different
responses on users@. Some responses to your questions inline below,
but first,
From my perspective as a user:
I was in the group of users that needed newer tools for development
than what I could get on RHEL/CentOS. I thought SCL was
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 11. 08. 19 0:34, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Obviously, we can prevent this by only orphaning packages with NEW bugz,
> >> but that doesn't really solve anything, because lot of the retired
> >> packages were actually
What does this koji error mean?
BuildError: package thrift is blocked for tag f32-updates-candidate
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37187038)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:56 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> >>>>> "C" == Christopher writes:
>
> C> BuildError: package thrift is
> C> blocked for tag f32-updates-candidate
> C> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3718703
I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How
do I work around this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:03 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
> > keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 package
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote:
>
>
> Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want to
> use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't really
> accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network access and you
> have whitelisted
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM John Harris wrote:
[SNIP]
> I cannot imagine who approved this firewall configuration. This is broken.
> This is a critical vulnerability, in my opinion.
>
I think "approved" is probably the wrong word: more like "pushed it
through". FESCo explicitly rejected the p
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:23 PM John Harris wrote:
> >
> > sshd was enabled by default back in F23, unless my install was completely
> > broken. I wouldn't remember that well, unfortunately, as I've been running
> > KDE
> > since the end of
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM John Harris wrote:
>
> > Essentially disabling the firewall falls under having a "bad design for
> > everyone else". Disabling the firewall is something that could be considered
> > hostile to the user.
>
> Th
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:33 PM wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:56 PM, Christopher
> wrote:
>
> 2) the Workstation WG has not only taken no action in response to the FESCo
> statement of trust at the conclusion of our last lengthy discussion on this
> matter, i
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:52 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:57 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > At the very least, it'd be nice if anaconda had an option to select
> > the default firewalld zone during installation,
>
> A somewhat rela
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:04 AM Danny Lee wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to the devel list and fedora in general, but i was wondering if
> these kind of back and forths between a few people is a frequent
> occurrence. I came to Fedora to volunteer what little spare time I have
> to help the Fedor
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > A similar idea that would keep it separate from the installer might be
> > to offer a dialogue as a "first-boot" action, but that seems like it&#x
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:23 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 8:13:59 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > The default firewall config affects every user of that edition, even
> > if they never use GNOME (or even use graphical boot). So, I don't know
> &
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:08 AM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:00:35 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > No, the default firewalld zone affects all Fedora Workstation users,
> > because firewalld runs outside of GNOME. Just because a user uses the
>
101 - 200 of 1064 matches
Mail list logo
