On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 02:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dear Fedora developers, > > > > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making > > minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build > > dependencies, etc. > > I strongly support this idea. > > In the past it probaby made sense to have GCC and friends in minimal > buildroot, but nowdays we have packages written in dozen of different > programming languages, which don't use GCC for compilation. It makes > perfect sense to drop C-related build tools from Koji @bulid group. > > I share this sentiment. Additionally, I strongly prefer naming BuildRequires explicitly. It's easier for contributors to understand what is going on, who can read a spec file, but aren't familiar with the specific conventions of the distro. I'm not a fan of "magic" dependencies.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
