On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczko.tom...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On 14 March 2017 at 07:24, Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:
>
> g++: error: /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a: No such file or
> directory
>
> the thrift  buildsystem doesn't treat ppc64le as a 64-bit arch
> with /usr/lib64, probably there is a hard-coded list of arches ...
>
>
> Despite such simple to fix bug using static libraries should be removed.
>
>

Your comment makes me wonder if there is *any* appropriate use of
boost-static. If not, why is it even packaged?
I'd be happy to accept your help patching what upstream is doing to move
from boost-static to boost-test (I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable about
C/C++ tooling to switch on my own), but since the dependency is limited to
unit testing during the build, I think it's probably fine.


> kloczek
>
> --
> Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH <http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH>*
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to