Re: my EPEL-6 packages up for takers

2010-05-01 Thread Christopher
FSLock > perl-Heap > perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks > perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse > perl-Math-MatrixReal > perl-Math-Symbolic > perl-Module-Signature > perl-Parse-Yapp > perl-Statistics-Descriptive > perl-Test-Distribution > perl-Text-CHM > perl-Text-Unidecode > pmount

Hadoop javadoc problem (FTBFS)

2015-07-09 Thread Christopher
ently regarding jersey, so I can fix my stuff? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: dnf doesn't check for rpmdb lock?

2015-07-16 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: > > I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my > machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it did > say that it was waiting on a process

Re: Packaging with hidden strings

2015-08-03 Thread Christopher
fler > I didn't read the question as being about app keys. It sounds to me more like the question was about how to package an app which could be easily configured with a user's private authentication credentials. For instance, a client-app for an internet service that requires

Re: Rawhide plans

2015-08-20 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/20/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: >> >> If you have a bad experience that experience stays >> with you. Maybe you can get over it, maybe you can't. But a name does >> have history. > > > I guess, you guys are not aware that other

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-11 Thread Christopher
Wouldn't the provides line needs a full path, otherwise, it could conflict? I'm generally against this proposal. One of the reasons I like using a distribution like Fedora is for dependency convergence. And I prefer exceptions to be rare and carefully deliberated. That said, where I think this co

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

2015-09-24 Thread Christopher
I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's breaking, does anybody have any insight into what's going on with this, and wha

FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-19 Thread Christopher
Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263 Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving updates? Or only F21 and later? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: FESCo #1263 question (optional javadocs)

2014-08-20 Thread Christopher
ropriate Obsoletes line when the condition fails (>=20), but that's more to maintain in the specfile, and it'd be much simpler to just not declare any subpackaging for javadocs. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač

Re: Future changes in the new package and new branch processes

2014-09-08 Thread Christopher
eviewer is a packager¹) > > * cvsadmin approves the creation of the package in pkgdb > > => package creation broadcasted on fedmsg > > * git adjusted automatically > > Tomas > Overall, I like the proposal, but I think it could be made simpler on new packagers (and

Re: 'Branch freeze policy' and 'Change deadline' naming change proposal

2014-09-24 Thread Christopher
licy" which > determines what stuff can break those freezes. > > Along with the renaming I'd like to work over the documentation a bit so > all the relevant pages link up and sing from the same hymn sheet, but I > can actually do that right now, orthogonal to the renaming, wit

Re: Changing release time (was Re: Major wiki revisions:)

2014-09-26 Thread Christopher
many people, for that matter). UTC is much less confusing, and I'm a big fan. +1 15:00 UTC seems reasonable, but I have no preference. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20)

2015-04-21 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Mat Booth wrote: > > On 20 April 2015 at 19:00, wrote: [snip] >>Package (co)maintainers Status Change >> == >> erlang-jsx orphan, erlang-sig, peter6 week

Re: erlang-jsx about to be retired (Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20))

2015-04-21 Thread Christopher
, rather than switch to a newer upstream version? What degree of confidence do you have that 0.9.2 (the current upstream version) doesn't break thrift 0.9.1-based projects? [1]: http://bit.ly/1IBSsrW [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1691 [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-16 Thread Christopher
Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias? fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked services trying to use my forwarding address for my account id rather than my FAS user id. My forwarding address is subject to change, but the FAS email alias is static. On

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

2020-06-16 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias? > >[1]fa...@fedoraproject.org ? I've been annoyed by FAS-linked s

[EPEL] rpmconf question for EPEL7 on Amazon Linux 2

2020-06-30 Thread Christopher
6. If it's possible to use '>=3.6' instead, and the package maintainer is willing to update it so it works with python 3.7 on Amazon Linux 2, that would be great for my use case. Regards, Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- deve

Re: [EPEL] rpmconf question for EPEL7 on Amazon Linux 2

2020-07-01 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Christopher > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I know Fedora doesn't directly support Amazon Linux, but I was > > wondering if the package maintainer for rpmconf o

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

2014-03-25 Thread Christopher
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are still developing against JDK 1.6. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii O

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

2014-03-26 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote: > * Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]: >> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not >> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it >> stands, it's difficult to use a modern F

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher
Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Workstat

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller: >> >>> There was a long thread about this on the desktop mailing list, and I was >>> not in the 'disable the firewall' camp in

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher
I think you and I disagree that "b" is broken. In my mind "b" (listening w/firewall closed) is precisely what the firewall is designed to do... act as a failsafe in the event of an unexpected application listening when a user doesn't really know or want it to. -- Ch

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:11 PM, William Brown wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:49 -0700, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 20:41 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote: >> >> > > >> > > What you need is clearly different "zones" that the user can configure >> > > and associate to networks, wi

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-16 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Christopher wrote: >> > Perhaps shorten to: >> > >> > block >> > public >> > work >> > home >> >> That is a much more intuitive defa

Self Introduction: Christopher Tubbs

2014-05-19 Thread Christopher
Hi, My name is Christopher Tubbs. I'm a long-time user of Fedora and Linux, and a big fan of free (as in speech) software. I love bigdata and scientific computing, and consider myself a seasoned Java developer and Maven user. I'm currently working on Apache Accumulo as my first p

Re: Self Introduction: Christopher Tubbs

2014-05-20 Thread Christopher
Thanks. I still have a bit of work to do before its ready for review... mainly right now, it's missing control scripts and systemd (units?). I'm hoping to have it ready for review soon. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Mikola

Re: JNI packaging guidelines for optional native sub-package

2014-06-06 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Christopher wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm working on packaging a jar which includes a java-only > implementation, and optionally loads [System.load()] if configured to > do so and the shared library is available. > > The actual (arch-de

Re: Looking for co-maintainers: zookeeper, bookkeeper, curator

2015-10-14 Thread Christopher
I'm currently a co-maintainer on ZooKeeper. I know there's some bugs that I've overlooked these last few months. I intend to try to address some of them this week, but having another, esp. an upstream maintainer involved, would be nice. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrot

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

2015-10-18 Thread Christopher
To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically mirroring all packages in GitHub, like the ASF does, and emailing maintainers when

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

2015-10-19 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > >> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror >> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull >> requests). >> > > While I lik

fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

2015-10-20 Thread Christopher
Has anybody else noticed that the fedora-packages bug listing (linked from pkgdb) seems out of sync with bugzilla? For example, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zookeeper/bugs shows bugs which have been closed as being still open, and the counts are incorrect. Is this a known issue? -- dev

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

2015-10-21 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM Ralph Bean wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but > > it's not happened yet. ;( > > Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week! > > https://github

Bodhi updates not pushed?

2015-10-25 Thread Christopher
On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. Did I do something wrong? Where can I go to check or fix the problem? --

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

2015-10-26 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 04:46 Peter Robinson wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694>:// <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694>bugzilla.redhat.com <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-11-02)

2015-11-03 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:48 AM wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

2015-11-07 Thread Christopher
I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surprised me. In addition to the mediatomb configuration needing to be changed, I also n

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

2015-11-07 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015, 12:28 Christopher wrote: I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surprised me. In addition to the

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

2015-11-08 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015, 14:29 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from > em1 to eno1. &g

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

2015-11-10 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:06:51AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and i

Ivy packaging for EPEL7

2015-11-16 Thread Christopher
What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, which comes with xmvn 2, but it looks like EL7/EPEL7 is mostly a F19-era package set. Are there any plans to bu

Re: Ivy packaging for EPEL7

2015-11-18 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM Christopher wrote: > What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm > trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. > > I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, which comes with xmvn

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

2015-11-19 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you >> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your >> package, or follow some specific process w

LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

2015-11-30 Thread Christopher
What's the deal with libreoffice packages being a dependency for so many system library packages? I try to `sudo dnf remove libreoffice\*` and it grabs a bunch of surprising packages with it, including some fonts and system libraries. Granted, I don't think I need any of these things, so it's prob

Upstream DNF?

2015-11-30 Thread Christopher
Where is the upstream DNF issue tracker? I see the project on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf However, there doesn't appear to be a corresponding issue tracker, or point of contact to request access to edit Wiki pages (which are locked down), etc. In fact, there appears to b

Let's Encrypt for F23?

2015-12-03 Thread Christopher
I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a 'letsencrypt' package. Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soon might be very useful for F23 users. Does anybody have any plans t

Devel archives site is awesome, but...

2015-12-04 Thread Christopher
The devel mailing list archives has an awesome interface, but unfortunately, it only seems to work with the devel@ list, not any of the others (like java-devel@). Any plans to extend that functionality to improve all the mailing list archives? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Easier %config management?

2015-12-12 Thread Christopher
Which components/packages are best candidates for adding a feature which would make it easier for users to track changes from the default %config %files on the system? I've found this to be a deficiency, requiring users to do configuration management independently of the installer tools on a syste

Re: Easier %config management?

2015-12-14 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:50 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 13.12.2015 um 05:58 schrieb Christopher: > > rpm could track more than hashes of config files, and instead track the > > full file. This could be optional, as it uses more disk space, but disk > > space is chea

Re: Easier %config management?

2015-12-14 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 13.12.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: > > For the few cases that can't or won't comply, then having rpm > > (optionally?) make the originals available would be fantastic for > > system management > > how many copies would you

Re: Easier %config management?

2015-12-14 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.12.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Christopher: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald > For me, I'd want the up-to-date one from the current version of the > > installed packages, not the initial

Re: Easier %config management?

2015-12-15 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:37 AM J. Randall Owens < jrowens.fed...@ghiapet.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2015 02:47 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > > > i modified my &qu

Re: Easier %config management?

2015-12-21 Thread Christopher
That blog seems to describe supporting a stateless use case, not for advocating that all systems should be stateless. In any case, the factory reset use case they describe is similar to some of my own. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 23:32 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Harald

Re: is there a reason for starting zookeeper.service in background?

2016-01-11 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 11.01.16 18:30, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > quoted from systemd.serivce manual page > > > > >> it is recommended to also use the PIDFile= option, so that systemd can > > identify the main process of the daemon

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-20 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen wrote: [snip] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript > Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only > applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am > not sure that applies to my c

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-21 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:03 PM Sander Hoentjen wrote: > On 01/21/2016 12:29 AM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen > <mailto:san...@hoentjen.eu>> wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pac

Gnome keyring security in Fedora

2016-01-21 Thread Christopher
getting some of this right, but doesn't have good integration with Gnome/Seahorse/GPG. Thoughts? -- Christopher -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

2016-01-28 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM Christopher wrote: > I've been thinking about Gnome keyring a lot lately, and I have concerns > about security, and I don't know if this is a Gnome keyring problem, or a > problem affecting Fedora specifically. > > In short, it doesn'

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

2016-01-28 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:43:09 + > Christopher wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > > things in Fedora. > > No, but it could be no one who

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

2016-01-28 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 18:43 +0000, Christopher wrote: > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > > things in Fedora. > > Any application running as your user can read an

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: NSS enforces the system-wide crypto policy

2016-05-23 Thread Christopher
t sense? Note that openjdk will also conform to the > system wide policy. > > regards, > Nikos > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 15:24 +, Christopher wrote: > > What is the impact on openjdk crypto providers? > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016, 05:49 Jan Kurik wrote: > &g

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-27 Thread Christopher
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the > > > server: better accounting, more

Bugzilla email address sync

2016-06-01 Thread Christopher
I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. Then, I got an email with the title "Please fix your bugzilla.redhat.com account" This email was notifying me that my bugzilla.redhat.com account email address did not match my FAS forwarding address. I'd really rather not broadcast my

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

2016-06-01 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:51:27 + > Christopher wrote: > > > I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. > > > > Then, I got an email with the title "Please fix your > > bugzilla.redh

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

2016-06-02 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:37:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:30:14 + > > Christopher wrote: > > > > > Thanks. I opened: > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastr

Hadoop?

2016-06-02 Thread Christopher
So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or retired? in Fedora. This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is dependent upon Hadoop. What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora t

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-02 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher > wrote: > > So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, > > for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or >

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-02 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM gil wrote: > > > Il 02/06/2016 23:20, Chris Murphy ha scritto: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher > wrote: > >> So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my > fault, > >> for not paying att

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-03 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:35 AM Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:19AM +0000, Christopher wrote: > > > Ugh. Wish I had noticed. Is there a quick way to get it unretired? It's > > still an essential dependency of some packages which are not retired, or > &g

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-03 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil wrote: > > > Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: > > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it resulted in an error. > have you open a rel-eng ticket as suggested before? > regards > .g > -- > devel mailing list > deve

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-03 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:33 PM Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil wrote: > >> >> >> Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: >> > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it resulted in an error. >> have you open a rel-eng ticke

Netcat

2016-06-16 Thread Christopher
So, I'm trying to understand what's going on with netcat. If anybody can enlighten me, I'd appreciate it. Here's what I've found so far: It looks like rpms/nc was retired due to being orphaned for too long. It looks like the same thing (almost) happened to rpms/nc6. I think netcat is too importan

i686 failures

2016-06-16 Thread Christopher
I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't really suitable for 32-bit architectures (IMO) and I doubt it's a well

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-17 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM Mat Booth wrote: > On 16 June 2016 at 20:16, Christopher wrote: > >> I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on >> i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I >> don&

Re: Netcat

2016-06-17 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > On 16 June 2016 at 14:23, Xose Vazquez Perez > wrote: > >> Christopher wrote: > >> > >>> So, I'm trying to unders

Re: i686 failures

2016-06-19 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM gil wrote: > > > Il 16/06/2016 22:32, Dan Horák ha scritto: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:16:38 +0000 > Christopher wrote: > > > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures > [1] on i686 in koji that I cann

(retire nc6) never retired a package before

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
Hi all, I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way through it for nc6. Background: * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't been removed from comps entirely) * nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never was. In

Re: (retire nc6) never retired a package before

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:02 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way > > through it for nc6. > > > > Background: > > > > * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it > hasn't > > been removed from comps entirely)

Unsorted comps

2016-06-20 Thread Christopher
So, I'm trying to follow the retire instructions to retire nc6 and update comps, and I noticed a discrepancy between the instructions for updating the comps, and the actual state of the comps files. Running the xsltproc command at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_pa

fedora-packager installs yum

2016-06-28 Thread Christopher
Installing fedora-packager pulls in yum as a dependency. Is this expected on a system built around dnf and without yum already installed? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Looking for a proven packager

2016-06-30 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:35 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream > > will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora before > > upstream will release new versi

Re: wiki editing changes

2016-07-16 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 15:47 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In order to prevent these spam wiki edits entirely, we have changed the > wiki to require a user to have both signed the FPCA and be in at least > one additional group (CLA+1). This may require some workflow changes > for a few groups such as Fedor

Did something change with ssh-agent in F24?

2016-07-19 Thread Christopher
Previously in F23, an ssh-agent was running when I started a gnome session. I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that this was being provided by gnome-keyring-daemon. Now, it appears that one isn't running. When I type "ssh-add -L", I get the message: "Could not open a connection to your authentication

Re: Did something change with ssh-agent in F24?

2016-07-21 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:24 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > On 07/20/2016 12:44 AM, Christopher wrote: > > Previously in F23, an ssh-agent was running when I started a gnome > > session. I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that this was being provided > > by gnome-keyring-daemon. &g

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

2016-07-21 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:31 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:57:47PM -0000, Christopher Tubbs wrote: > > This is still causing me headaches. GPG2 switched away from the > secring.gpg file, and now I have multiple tools using different files for > storing my c

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

2016-07-29 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > js-jquery1 (el5) > js-jquery1 (el6) > js-jquery1 (epel7) > js-jquery1 (f23) > js-jquery1 (f24) > js-jquery1 (f25) > js-jquery1 (master) > js-jquery (el5) > js-jquery (el6) > js-jquery (epel7) > js-jquery (f23) > js-jquery (f24) > js-jquery (f

Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

2016-08-19 Thread Christopher
Can somebody please reopen and appropriately mark the following bug for EPEL7, so it doesn't get auto-closed on new Fedora releases? Thanks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164414 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lis

Please bump bz#1017603 to F24

2016-08-19 Thread Christopher
Can somebody please re-open and bump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017603 to F24. The bug was auto-closed because it was marked for F22. I've taken the package for newer Fedora versions, but cannot update bugs marked for older Fedora versions which were auto-closed, because I don't h

Re: Please bump bz#1017603 to F24

2016-08-19 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:25:49 + > Christopher wrote: > > > Can somebody please re-open and bump > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017603 to F24. The bug > > was auto-closed because it was mar

Re: Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

2016-08-19 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:41 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 01:30, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Christopher > >> wrot

Re: Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

2016-08-20 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:16 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 02:07 +0000, Christopher wrote: > > Ah, my mistake. I was under the impression that it was missing, > > because > > related to gnome-python2-desktop ( > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: bash style guide on Fedora?

2016-08-22 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, > > We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as > /etc/init.d/functions > /etc/profile > > Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding > standards) to write the shell script on Feod

Re: bash style guide on Fedora?

2016-08-22 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM Dominique Martinet < dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote: > Jun Aruga wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:36:48AM -0400: > > shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :) > > He does mean shellcheck[1]. > > It's nice; doesn't do style check (e.g. tr

Re: Please bump bz#1017603 to F24

2016-08-24 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:26 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote: > > Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be able to > > change it. > > It's weird, because I can change > > https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: Please bump bz#1017603 to F24

2016-08-24 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:06:15 + > Christopher wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:26 AM Mikolaj Izdebski > > wrote: > > > > > On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > > Interestin

Re: OCB blockcipher mode - is it allowed?

2016-08-27 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi, > > I have some questions about OCB[0] and it's usage in Fedora. > > I wanted to package pycryptodome[1] and found that they implement OCB > in their code. From my POV (completely without any legal knowledge) it > seems that it's not comp

Re: Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

2016-08-29 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:49 AM Christopher wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:16 AM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > >> On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 02:07 +0000, Christopher wrote: >> > Ah, my mistake. I was under the impression that it was missing, >> > because >

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-15 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac wrote: > On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > >> Lars Seipel wrote: > >>> What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship > >>> applications to carry ads and report track

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-15 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Christopher > wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-16 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad < mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel > wrote: > > So Mozilla has recently gone live with its advertisement tiles on the > > "New Tab" page. Only newly created profiles get to see this stuff. > > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >