-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
due to a lack of time in last two weeks I want to move the Astronomy
Spin to Fedora 24: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242917#c
6
I think for 23 a Fedora Remix is the better solution to allow more
public testing and feedback.
I've taken yasm.
Greetings,
Christian
On 09/30/2015 09:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become
Spin
/>/
/>/ Change owner(s): Christian Dersch
/>/
/>/ A Fedora Spin providing a complete toolchain for both amateur and
/>/ professional astronomers.
/>/
/>/
/>/ == Detailed Description ==
/>/ In both amateur and professional astronomy and astrophysics Linux is
/&
Additional info: Of course an "Astronomy Tools" group is a nice idea
too! But it doesn't replace the Spin as the "download, boot and try it"
idea doesn't work without a spin.
On 06/26/2015 10:28 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the change owne
.
So IMHO it's not only a question of package collection, but also a
question of marketing.
On 06/26/2015 11:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> Additional info: Of course an "Astronomy Tools" group is a nice idea too!
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thank you very much for your feedback! So it seems that a dedicated
Astronomy Spin will be a benefit for Fedora :)
@Software bundles: There may be two of them: "Observational Astronomy"
and "Astronomical Data Analysis"
On 29.06.2015 14:37, Matthew
On 27/07/2020 14:28, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I just got a BZ on OpenImageIO due to inability to install the -devel
> package,
>
> Upon inspection it looks like the soname was bumped but a rebuild of
> OIIO was not performed.
>
> libdc1394-2.2.2-14.fc32 -> libdc1394-2.2.6-1.fc33
>
> libdc1394.so.22()
On 29/07/2020 14:47, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I couldn't find the capability within fedpkg or koji so for posterity
> I came up with this:
>
> $ for rpm in $(lynx -dump -listonly
> "https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48063412"; | grep
> "rpm$"); do curl -LO $rpm; done
>
> Thanks,
>
On 10/07/2015 10:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per this fesco ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
>
> I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point of
> contact:
>
> liborigin -- Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files ( master f23 f22
> f21
It's 3 clause BSD (as you can see with licensecheck), In license tag: BSD
On 11/06/2015 02:58 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm trying to package python-cycler for matplotlib. It has the attached
> LICENSE file. What should I put for license: tag?
>
>
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
Hi,
I've taken quassel now as I use it on EPEL7 and I found that there was a
security fix release in 0.11.x series.
Greetings,
Christian
On 10/30/2015 06:00 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have orphaned the EPEL7 branch of Quassel as I have stopped
> using it long ago and no longer
Hi all,
I can confirm the behaviour Jens reports, there are already two bugs
open @RHBZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275275
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279538
Greetings,
Christian
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 22:11 +0100, Jens Lody wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2015
Hello Joachim,
you're welcome! Nice to see other astrophysicists from Germany here :)
I'm working on classification problems (mostly variable stars) using
modern machine learning algorithms.
Do you already know our Special Interest Groups:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Astronomy_SIG
htt
On 12/24/2015 10:01 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> libapogee (sergiopr, lupinix)
> qwtplot3d (chitlesh, lupinix)
>
Done :) Also added %license.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
As I use it everyday: Taken! And thank you for your work on it :)
Greetings,
Christian
On 01/04/2016 02:38 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Feel free to take it.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/thunderbird-enigmail/
>
>
>
> Remi.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproje
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Astronomy_Spin
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Christian Dersch
>
> A Fedora Spin providing a complete toolchain for both amateur and
> professional astronomers.
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> In both amateur and professional astronomy and astro
And
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-June/thread.html#211773
On 01/11/2016 12:54 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just for information: This change was discussed for Fedora 23 some
> months ago:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-J
On 01/11/2016 01:11 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Another thing that would probably be worth doing as part of this effort
> is making sure that all the apps you've identified as important to the
> Astronomy spin, to make sure all those apps show up nicely in the
> software center applications.
>
>
Hi all,
I tried to contact tuxbrewr some weeks ago (due to quassel bug fixes and
maintainance), without any response. Does anybody know how to contact
him? I already tried smparr...@gmail.com without success.
Info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294472
Greetings,
Christian
--
devel
On 01/12/2016 10:00 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The same procedure has been started a few times, at least
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/736874
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/963890
>
> Requesting co-maintainer access would be a way to solve such
> isues.
> --
>
I requested it in pkgdb some
Hi,
positive karma on a set of packages within short time can happen when
people use fedora-easy-karma. Thats my way of giving karma too, I use
the stuff for some hours, the I run fedora-easy-karma and give feedback
on all packages i've tested (and of course skip the ones I did not test ;).
But +
On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
>> after that can be either reported i
Hi all,
I created a copr repo containing RStudio builds, it is partly based on
the spec from Steve. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lupinix/R/
Maybe we can get this into official repos later, but first it needs some
testing and also some unbundling would be nice. Right now only RStudio
des
Hi all,
as qwtplot3d is no longer used by my packages (and maybe not required by any
package i my dnf reopquery was ok), I orphaned the package for Rawhide and
F25. Will still take care about F23 and F24 until they reach EOL. qwtplot3d is
also unmaintained upstream.
Greetings,
Christian
--
dev
Well, I just orphaned and not retired for that reason. So the scidavis
maintainer can just take it ;) It was the same for me when I maintained
scidavis some time ago, I've also just taken it for scidavis. I think as
long as qt3 and qt4 are available @Fedora (and Qt4 will remain for
longer time, don
Hi Björn,
Let's swap :D I've got some packages to review, just pick some ones open
in Astronomy SIG tracker :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115
Greetings,
Christian
On 10/07/2016 09:18 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have another three reviews to swap [1]. The first o
Hi all,
On 02/05/2017 09:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> This also mostly explains the why of this change,
> except for why also bring it to Fedora 25 and not
> just to Fedora 26 and later?
>
> The main reason for this is a non-technical reason,
> we (as in the Fedora project) have quite vocally
>
Just build your depending package. But be sure that your override made
it to the buildroot by using "|koji wait-repo epel7-build
--build=sundials-2.7.0-10.el7"
Greetings,
Christian
|
On 03/08/2017 12:46 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
I have created a buildroot-override for sundials-2.7.0
Hi Tim,
thanks for all your work on these tools!
Greetings,
Christian
On 03/22/2017 11:28 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Hi Guys
Because of work and personal life, I have not been able to find time
for taking care of my Fedora packages, so I have decided to orhan them.
dnfdaemon -- DBus daemon
On 03/26/2017 04:21 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26.3.2017 01:05, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>> clucene09 orphan, group::kde-sig,0 weeks
>> ago
>
> This seems to affect a lot of packages. Can we build Qt4 without it?
>
Already done by rdieter:
https://koji.fedoraproj
On 04/07/2017 05:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
previous updates to all future updates would becom
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for th
On 04/07/2017 05:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:49:15PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this
other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges.
What would be the advantage of os
On 04/07/2017 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had
On 04/12/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
I hope someone can help me with the following question:
Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like:
Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or p
On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
I hope someone can help me with the following question:
Does recent Fedora's rpm supp
On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed
at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens if
both libyui-gtk and libyui-qt are installed, w
On 04/12/2017 06:05 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed
at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What ha
As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also
missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?)
mirror issue, the Lab is not broken.
Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log:
03:44:25,447 WARN packaging: Failed to download
'python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch
On 05/31/2017 02:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/
What is "an older i686-netbook"?
On 06/01/2017 08:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/01/2017 06:28 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
available for testing.
Trying Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26_Beta-1.4.iso on an older
Hi all,
I have an issue with one package (wcslib) on i686 and armv7hl
architecture in rawhide, the built binary package has file conflicts
with some more packages only on that architectures, the others seem to
be fine (so it seems like 32 Bit is affected in general). Below log from
mock build of a
On 06/13/2017 12:38 AM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> thunderbird-enigmail lupinix75 weeks ago
>
Should be fixed now, new build submitted for updates-testing.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 06/17/2017 07:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only
issue I h
On 06/17/2017 07:41 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 06/17/2017 07:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb A
Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times,
also for Astronomy for example. So a new compose should be done here to
ensure the Spin gets in properly, it is not an issue with the Spin here
but an issue
On 07/12/2017 02:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>> Considering that SSE2 was introduced by Intel in 2001 and AMD caught up
>> with it in 2003, I'd be +1 (with my FESCo hat on) to requiring SSE2,
>> regardless of whether the above change is accepted.
> If you requ
On 07/12/2017 12:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.07.2017 um 12:04 schrieb Christian Dersch:
On 07/12/2017 02:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Considering that SSE2 was introduced by Intel in 2001 and AMD
caught up
with it in 2003, I'd
On 07/16/2017 01:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christian Schaller wrote:
>> One major reason is that it enables us to move towards having the Atomic
>> Workstation version be the primary one and maybe in the (very) long run be
>> the only one.
>>
>> A bit more detail about that can be found here:
>
On 07/14/2017 10:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:25:11PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> Maybe tangential to the proposal/discussion/ranting, but you can
>> actually use gnome-software on the command line.
>> /usr/libexec/gnome-software-cmd (no GTK parts get loaded) has g
On 07/10/2017 09:31 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> The rebuilt RPMs are really only interesting within Flatpaks - they
> will be available for download from Koji, but there would be no reason
> for a user to do so.
>
> As for standard application RPMs, it's really going to be something
> we figure out
On 07/16/2017 08:54 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> This is also trivial to offer in a UI.
> I think you and I disagree on what trivial constitutes.
>
>> And the (unrelated) online update issue is really a non-issue in practice,
>> as I explained in my reply to Debarshi Ray.
> Until you're the person
Hi all,
I'm going to orphan liborigin and liborigin2 in Rawhide. Last liborigin
dependency was LabPlot, but this does not depend on liborigin with 2.x
releases available in Rawhide. Same for liborigin2 which was required by
scidavis. Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin
file
liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008)
liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010)
On 02/08/2016 12:22 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin
>> files are not c
On 02/08/2016 02:13 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008)
>> liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010)
> Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am
>
Of course
On 02/08/2016 06:32 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I've taken them for the time being and I'll go over the specs and
> sources sometime this week. Can I bug you if I have any questions?
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li
On 02/19/2016 07:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper
> Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no
> further contact from Christopher. Normally we would not necessarily
> pre-announce an oprhaning action, ho
Note that Scientific and Astronomy Spins are also broken due to this
issue:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?method=livemedia&owner=ausil&state=all&view=tree&order=-id
On 02/19/2016 07:33 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Am 19.02.2016 18:12 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski :
>> I believe this is the list
Btw you can take it after orphaning ;)
On 02/19/2016 07:36 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> You are not the owner. This is not a question of maintainance itself
> in this case (and in case of my i3 stuff too)
>
> On 02/19/2016 07:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> rpms/python-py
You are not the owner. This is not a question of maintainance itself in
this case (and in case of my i3 stuff too)
On 02/19/2016 07:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22
> epel7 )
>
> whats wrong with this package? I think it is well-m
I've taken:
dmenu
i3
i3-ipc
i3lock
i3status
Greetings,
Christian
On 02/26/2016 07:20 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I have orphaned all these packages now.
>>
>> Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on.
>
> I've t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
orphaning makes sense for me here, I've also decided not to include it
into Astronomy Spin due to dead upstream and some issues I had in past.
Btw: I just wanted to have a look at it now and it segfaults @Fedora
23, a rebuild is not enough, see
Hi,
I'll take care @ kstars. astrometry is not an official package yet, it
is in review.
Greetings,
Christian
On 03/30/2016 07:14 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
> Hello, tomorrow I'm going to update wcslib to 5.14, which includes a
> soname bump. This change affects the following packages:
>
> c
F24 too I think, doesn't make sense to stay with 4.x there as upstream
projects (e.g. astropy start dropping support for older releases and
everything builds fine @24 too.
Christian
On 03/30/2016 08:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 19:14 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>> Hello,
Hi,
for Fedora it is part (subpackage) of the regular numpy source package.
So you can install python3-numpy there too ;)
Greetings,
Christian
On 11/04/2016 07:42 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just stumbled upon this. In
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-numpy
On 11/17/2016 09:01 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, folks!
>>
>> While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which
>> release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one plausible
>> candidate, I noticed something interestin
Hi Sandro,
I've contacted him via Facebook and told him that you're trying to
contact him. I think he'll response soon.
Greetings,
Christian
On 11/25/2016 01:00 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> I've seen that the mails to shogun-ow...@fedoraproject.org aka
> fed...@besser82.io are bouncing back becaus
Option 2 sounds really nice! For Option 1 I do not like the freeze for
an already released version. This makes small (non security) fixes more
complicated due to required freeze exceptions etc.
On 12/08/2016 03:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Trying to make this idea a little more concrete. Here'
Hi Johannes,
as I'm experienced with Qt related stuff (member of KDE SIG too) and
also use TeXStudio as my default TeX editor all day, I requested commit
access now :)
Greetings,
Christian
On 12/08/2016 05:36 PM, Johannes Lips wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to invite packagers with Qt exp
On 12/08/2016 07:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I would like to see us stop pushing non security updates to updates from
> updates-testing entirely and do it in monthly batches instead. we would push
> daily security fixes and updates-testing. However this would make atomic
> host
> 2 week
I'll take pylint, python-astroid and python-sphinx-argparse.
On 12/12/2016 07:22 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
In the spirit of the season I'm giving away packages :)
I am not using most of these anymore, so I'd like to send them off to a good
home:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/b
Hi Jon,
kstars depends on LibRaw too in rawhide.
Greetings,
Christian
On 12/28/2016 12:12 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> 0.18.0 is coming. I'm taking care of:
>
> efl
> entangle
> freeimage
> gegl03
> gthumb
> kf5-libkdcraw
> libkdcraw
> nomacs
> OpenImageIO
> oyranos
> shotwell
>
> If I missed some
Hi Mattia,
very nice! I already thought about that too but did not find the time
yet… But I can do the review to unretire the package and of course I'll
add it to Astronomy spin then.
Greetings,
Christian
On 01/15/2017 07:46 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> I intend to unretire wcstools.
>
> Wcstools w
osed Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_Spin
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_Spin>
Change owner(s):
* Christian Dersch
A Fedora Spin providing the LXQt desktop environment.
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt
/LXQt_Spin
Change owner(s):
* Christian Dersch
A Fedora Spin providing the LXQt desktop environment.
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt is a lightweight Qt-based desktop environment. Fedora provides it
since Fedora 22 as a group of packages. Now that LXQt is much more
complete, it is time to provide a
On 01/21/2017 01:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Kai Engert wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 10:22 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> Please just make sure they all get released in the same Bodhi update to
>>> avoid breakage.
>>
>> The combined updates have been
On 01/21/2017 03:25 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
With autokarma disabled, is there a minimum test duration, before it can get
pushed to stable?
Because we probably want to have it pushed to stable on Monday.
Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, but
karma mechanism is s
On 01/21/2017 03:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 03:25 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
With autokarma disabled, is there a minimum test duration, before it
can get
pushed to stable?
Because we probably want to have it pushed to stable on Monday.
Autokarma just means the package will
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes are contained in the new Firefox update.
Unless we want to delay Firefox 51, this update must go
On 01/23/2017 11:35 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
We should not break FreeIPA critically with that update (crashes on
start or so) for sure. But don't expect rock solid experience from
Fedora - there are RHEL/CentOS or other enterprise distros for that.
Fedora is focused mainly on new feature
:47 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> On 01/21/2017 03:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>>> Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, but
>>> karma mechanism is still active. So once your update reached the
>>> stable karma level you defined, y
On 04/10/2019 21:31, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity
that we need to resolve.
1. Once a user has selected a stream, updates should follow that
stream and not introduce incompatiblities. Se
Hi,
I intend to orphan pylint, python-astroid and python-lazy-object-proxy
(both required by pylint), anybody interested in taking them?
Greetings
Christian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
Hi,
I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager:
* i3
* i3lock
* i3status
* i3-ipc
* dzen2
* dmenu
Anybody here interested in taking them? Otherwise I'll orphan them on
Friday.
Greetings
Christian
___
devel mailing list -- d
Am 04.09.19 um 12:09 schrieb František Šumšal:
On 9/4/19 12:02 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager
Hello!
I'd definitely take the dmenu package if there's no-one else!
Thanks, dmenu is
Am 04.09.19 um 12:36 schrieb Dan Čermák:
Christian Dersch writes:
Hi,
I intend to orphan the packages related to i3 window manager:
* i3
* i3lock
* i3status
* i3-ipc
I'll take the i3 stack, since I have not yet migrated to sway
completely.
I'd be however more than happy to
Am 04.09.19 um 13:49 schrieb Dan Čermák:
Christian Dersch writes:
Am 04.09.19 um 12:36 schrieb Dan Čermák:
Thanks! i3 packages are yours now. Are you also interested in dzen2? It
is required by i3.
Ugh, I was hoping that it wasn't... But in that case: yes, please give
it to m
Am 04.09.19 um 14:37 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel:
I will. FAS: limb
Thanks! You own the packages now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
On 23/02/2020 14:28, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
The recent update from cantor 19.08 to cantor 12.12 in both fedora 32
and rawhide bumped the SONAME of a shared library as mention in
$SUBJECT (maintainers in CC).
At least LabPlot still needs to be rebuilt on both f32 and rawhide
(maint
On 23/02/2020 15:44, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 23/02/2020 14:28, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
The recent update from cantor 19.08 to cantor 12.12 in both fedora 32
and rawhide bumped the SONAME of a shared library as mention in
$SUBJECT (maintainers in CC).
At least LabPlot still
On 3/4/19 6:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and
> it doesn't appear to be on my end.
>
> I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's
> very painful.
Yes, same here.
Greetings,
Christian
___
On 10/06/2019 19:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How
Hi,
awesome! The themes are a seperate point, yes. Please note that libfm-qt
released a bugfix 0.13.1. In any case, your work is fine so I'll give
you access to lxqt-sig FAS group, which means you'll have commit access
to the LXQt specific packages.
Greetings,
Christian
On 08/04/2018 05:58 PM,
Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik :
>
>
> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
> >>
> >> There are several API changes and s
On 9/23/18 2:23 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
> this package to that person.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
Hi,
I'll take care of the package as it is part of the Astronomy Lab.
Greetings,
Christian
On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release.
[1] http://dl.fedor
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Christian Dersch
>
> I understand the complaint in isolation, but in relation to the
> existing processes and release criteria I do not follow. What solution
> do you propose?
>
> Right now release criteria explicitly does not block the
Hi all,
I orphaned the astronomy related packages scamp and cdsclient (dependency
of scamp). Feel free to take them :)
Greetings
Christian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
Hi Hans,
thank you very much for working on this! Forgot to give some feedback
before… I tested your packages for Fedora 27 with my ThinkPad T450s with
Crucial MX100 (512GB variant, one of the affected SSDs failing with
min_power setting) and TLP. According to powertop it saves about 1.1W in
idle
Hi all,
within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes
even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In
concrete case we have the firefox update [1], which already received 10
positive karma and many users complaining that it takes so long to get
it out as
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
