Dear all,
Unless someone objects, I plan to retire python-django4.2 from Rawhide
next week.
Tests currently fail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2374048
and Django upstream don't plan to support Python 3.14 on versions older
than 5.2 (the current LTS)
https://code.djangoproject.com
Hello Packagers,
Long story short: A not insignificant part of the rust2rpm code base
is dedicated to dealing with non-crate packages (i.e. running rust2rpm
with "--path " for a local Cargo.toml file, instead of pointing
it at a crate from crates.io).
This mode of operation requires special-cased
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 2:57 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
> updates.
>
> Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something
> in the kernel.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0b8ce0290c (k
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:48:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:05 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Yes, please go ahead.
> >
> > Don't worry about libguestfs - if it's broken after the rebuild
> > I will fix it myself.
>
> It looks like your 1.56.1 update fixed the issue
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 8:50 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> That's great, let me know if you need help.
>
> Also look out for ocaml-perl4caml as it seems to have a FTBFS,
> although I *believe* it's fixed by the earlier OCaml / Python change
> that you pushed already. Anyway if it still fails to
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:05 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Yes, please go ahead.
>
> Don't worry about libguestfs - if it's broken after the rebuild
> I will fix it myself.
It looks like your 1.56.1 update fixed the issue. It is building fine now.
> If you want any help with the rebuild, I'll
I've got a MR to finally update to the current upstream version of
python-coveralls -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-coveralls/pull-request/3
This also switches to using pyproject macros, but it also drops the html
documentation -- I can't sort out how to get Sphinx to work with the
up
Miro Hrončok venit, vidit, dixit 2025-07-11 00:19:38:
> On 18. 06. 25 22:22, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > This example and most that I know use a BR on python3-devel and
> > %pyproject_buildrequires, whereas the guidelines tell you to use *one*
> > of them. The result with both is the same as with j
Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
updates.
Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something
in the kernel.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0b8ce0290c (kernel-
6.16.0-0.rc5.45.fc43) was gated because of these weird failure
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250711.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Friday, 11 July 2025 at 07:44, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> It is also possible to (a) calculate the new PCR measurements
> beforehand
That's exactly what Microsoft want to ask from vendors in the future, but I
really wish them luck because when I asked them for the new PCR0 "golden
hashes" for L
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> > Also, the numbers are purely *GPU* load, ignoring the rest of the system
> > (eg the CPUs). Given that Wayland was designed to offload *more* work
> > onto the GPU, a higher GPU load in of itself isn't surprising.
> > There (from the same a
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 01:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> In the morning I'll see if fiddling with the openQA settings to use a
> different graphics adapter mitigates the problem, unless Justin's got a
> new kernel build through and it fixes the problem, or something. Until
> then, F43 updates
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:11:13AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> I (can) confirm this trend with an experiment i did with "Eve Online"
> running under X11 and Wayland. The X11 session topped the Wayland session by
> round about 30 FPS running the game in unthrottled mode in the same empty
> part o
On 10/07/2025 13:14, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
We aim to move away from manual management of
/usr/bin/node, /usr/bin/npm, and similar
symlinks to leveraging update-alternatives system.
AFAIK, the alternatives system doesn't work reliably on immutable
(ostree) Fedora versions.
I
Am 11.07.25 um 09:43 schrieb Jan Drögehoff:
These kind of benchmarks are worthless and cannot be reliably reproduced by
anyone.
The author has stated that they are going to share more tests using Kubuntu and
Fedora however I don't think they are going to start properly testing.
Would be nice to
On 11. 07. 25 10:43, Michael J Gruber wrote:
No, please don't misquote the guidelines when I refer to them
explicitely.
"Such a package MUST use one of the following ..."
Specifically, it does not say "at least one" but uses "one", the number,
which - in English - is different from the indefini
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:43:06AM -, Jan Drögehoff wrote:
> These kind of benchmarks are worthless and cannot be reliably
> reproduced by anyone.
Here's a radical idea. Instead of going through all of that effort to
produce nonreproducible, useless results, they could install the
Phoronix
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 05:19:59PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 6:40 PM Germano Massullo
> wrote:
> >
> > Richard Fontana has given his answer to the license question
> > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/668#note_2600398017
> >
> > I am plannin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 6:40 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
>
> Richard Fontana has given his answer to the license question
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/668#note_2600398017
>
> I am planning to resume eza packaging soon
I wouldn't say that "I haven't looked closely e
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:33 AM Richard Hughes via devel
wrote:
> That's exactly what Microsoft want to ask from vendors in the future, but I
> really wish them luck because when I asked them for the new PCR0 "golden
> hashes" for LVFS updates only one vendor complied, and and only for a few
image builds, podman
tests, and FreeIPA tests (but a lot of other tests failed on the
compose -
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20250711.n.0&groupid=1
- and I haven't had time to check through all of them yet). Ther
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250711.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250712.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 27
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 507.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
23 matches
Mail list logo
