Hey all-
I’m trying to fix build failures for swift-lang on F42 and while
I’ve fixed a number of places where wasn’t explicitly
defined, I’m now getting a strange compile error regarding math.h and
cmath that I can’t reproduce outside of a full build:
```
54 | #if __has_include()
55 | #in
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 04:32:54PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Updated diff:
> >
> > > Zbyszek
> >
> > I have a preference for seein
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 1:03 AM Jan Drögehoff wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:23 PM Jan Drögehoff sentrycraft...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > I'm generally in favor of this, especially since it would establish a
> > > status quo that could benefit other languages w
On 12/5/24 09:45, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 12. 24 20:32, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 11/21/24 17:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 21. 11. 24 23:11, William Cohen wrote:
Sediment has been designed to work with the RPM build process.
Currently, one needs to use modified RPM macros. These
Were the FTBFS bugs filed differently this time? It appears that there were
actually two FTBFS bugs filed against Audacity
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339522 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339913) that both reference the
same Koji task, but then the first bug
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:27 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Wouldn't the config-file-as-separate-source-file approach would be
> > more or less backwards compatible,
> > whereas creating the config snippet in-line is o
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > It's possible that I'm in the minority here, but I honestly don't think
> > anything should be pushed to dist-git unless it's intended to be built more
> > or less immediately. Yes, even changes without an imme
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 10:40:09AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> It's possible that I'm in the minority here, but I honestly don't think
> anything should be pushed to dist-git unless it's intended to be built more
> or less immediately. Yes, even changes without an immediate functional
> imp
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 12:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Note that side tags aren't the only issue. Sometimes a maintainer
>> > commits a bump to git but doesn't build it in a side
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250126.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250127.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi,
this is just a quick message that I'll be retiring rdist package in
Rawhide. The Upstream of rdist is long gone and it has been recently hit
with the GCC15 and is currently in the state of FTBFS. The only package
that depends on it is rssh, I already spoke to Huzaifa and he agreed to
remo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250126.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250127.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 182
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.45 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 04:32:54PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > Updated diff:
>
> > Zbyszek
>
> I have a preference for seeing packages follow
> the current packaging guidelines (that I can find)
> that say:
>
>
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 12:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Note that side tags aren't the only issue. Sometimes a maintainer
> > commits a bump to git but doesn't build it in a side tag or rawhide,
> > for whatever reason. Sometimes a package is*built*,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Wouldn't the config-file-as-separate-source-file approach would be
> more or less backwards compatible,
> whereas creating the config snippet in-line is only compatible with F42+?
> Naively, I would think that the more-or-less-backw
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 7:26 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:40 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > It's possible that I'm in the minority here, but I honestly don't think
> > > anything should be pushed to dist-git unless it's intended to be b
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 6:26 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> If I correct a typo in a comment, I should bump the release and cause
> churn on build servers and mirrors, even though nothing at all changes
> in the binary package?
I do worry about server/storage usage, but in
my more innocent years I ha
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250125.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250126.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 131.63 KiB
Size of dropped packages
18 matches
Mail list logo
