Fedora eln compose report: 20250121.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250120.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250121.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 29 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

* Mikel Olasagasti: > Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant > shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to > vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure > from our current guidelines [2]. > [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/i

Build order

Dne 18. 01. 25 v 11:01 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): I have an idea I'd like to hear you out on how to reduce failures on mass rebuilds. I think some of the build failures are due to building things out of sequence. I mean, package A buildrequires package B, but since the mass rebuild is pe

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Mikel Olasagasti venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-20 08:02:18: > > Hi, > > > > Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant > > shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to > > vendoring/bun

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250120.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250119.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250120.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 96 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 900.56 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

Mikel Olasagasti venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-20 08:02:18: > Hi, > > Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant > shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to > vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure > from our current gu

Re: A fix for the FTBFS issue with the jed text editor

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 02:49:36AM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > > > Steps to join the packager group: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ > > I have gone through most of those steps now, though I think I still need > to send an introduct

Re: A fix for the FTBFS issue with the jed text editor

Dne 19. 01. 25 v 11:49 Loren M. Lang napsal(a): On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 07:16:57PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Benson Muite wrote on 2025/01/19 19:04: Hi Loren, On Sun, Jan 19, 2025, at 12:50 PM, Loren M. Lang wrote: I just noticed that jed was on the FTBFS list and was failing to build on F

Re: tree-sitter build broke Emacs

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, 12:27 Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Wednesday, 15 January 2025 22:31:22 CET Jerry James wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:34 AM Andreas Schneider > wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 15 January 2025 01:06:19 CET Jerry James wrote: > > > > Emacs is uninstallable in Rawhide due to

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

I'm generally in favor of this, especially since it would establish a status quo that could benefit other languages where the usual way of dealing with dependencies is incompatible with distributions. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: FTB due to 'too many arguments to function'

* Artur Frenszek-Iwicki: >> indi-3rdparty-drivers: >> error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’ >> Looks like the syntax 'typedef enum { FALSE, TRUE } bool;' is no more >> accepted, but searching in the net it was perfectly fine. > > Looking at the build logs, it seems that while a sta

End of Life of github2fedmsg

Hi everyone, as was already announced in Announcing Webhook To Fedora Messaging Fedora Infrastructure team is working on replacement of github2fedmsg service. As the

Re: GCC 15 for Fedora 42 in a side-tag

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 4:10 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 12:53:29PM -0700, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Ka

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 07:31, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Mikel Olasagasti: > > > Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant > > shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to > > vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure > >

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-01-21)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-01-21 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

These are all great points. I also second the Golang change. However, just to clarify, Go and Rust both generate ELF binaries as well, but Golang is not comparable to the some of the other examples mentioned. If you have a vulnerability in a package in Python, for example, you can deliver one s

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

Hau idatzi du Michael J Gruber (m...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak (2025 urt. 20(a), al. (11:29)): > > Following the Go-SIG proposal would be the can-opener to deviate from > our distribution model in general. I mean, if I can pull in a myriad of > Go or Rust modules for my package to build (wi

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hau idatzi du Michael J Gruber (m...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak > (2025 urt. 20(a), al. (11:29)): > > > On a related note, I recently highlighted how the introduction of > > > Golang 1.24 has caused significant breakage in over 200 packages [3], > > > an issue that

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 8:02 AM Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > > Hi, > > Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant > shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to > vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure > from our current gu

Re: sdl2-compat problem?

Am 19.01.25 um 18:24 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:07 AM Neal Gompa wrote: On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: Hello, I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get further but the build sti

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2025 urt. 20(a), al. (21:27)): > > I also don't understand the argument of "bundling would let us solve > 200 broken packages caused by Go compiler changes faster". If the > libraries fail to compile in standalone packages, then t

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, at 21:27, Fabio Valentini wrote: > That said, reading other posts in this thread, I just don't think this > is a good model for *all* "non-ELF" languages, and it shouldn't serve > as a precedent. > The Go ecosystem is a little bit special, in that there is no package > manager

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

Dne 20. 01. 25 v 11:29 dop. Michael J Gruber napsal(a): There is a second point to that, and that is Fedora as a development platform (not just as an "app" platform). If we expect developers to install dependencies of their project via the ecosystem tools (pip, ...) locally (envs, containers) and

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, at 6:24 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 20. 01. 25 v 11:29 dop. Michael J Gruber napsal(a): >> There is a second point to that, and that is Fedora as a development >> platform (not just as an "app" platform). If we expect developers to >> install dependencies of their projec

Re: Orphaned magic-wormhole + its python deps

Hi I'm working on the upstream Tahoe-LAFS project (upstream from wormhole) and two of us are interested in Fedora packaging, so please feel free to let me know if you're not getting what you need to move forward. Blaise On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 5:13 AM Benson Muite wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025,